First, thanks to those of you who have taken the time to respond to this petition thread. My hope is the more people who reply to this the more the VSL team will realize we need some basic loops for these wonderful instruments.
Second, let me thank Herb for his detailed response. I understand the dilemma of the time it would take to loop every instrument in the library, but I think I have aa possible interim solution. Included in the first edition strings are string ensembles. If you took a combination str ens of basses thru violins and gave us loops of just the sustain & tremelo strings at one dynamic level of mf we could at least use this patch for long sustained passages, which in film music is used on a daily basis!! I had this same problem with the SAM horns, and when I requested a looped version of their sustained horns, they made a couple of patches within weeks and posted them on their website for registered users to download. Perhaps you could do the same thing? I'd be very grateful as at this point all I can do is use other string libraries to hold sustains & trem's and that seems to defeat the purpose of your "one orchestra sound" concept. Thank you!

Good call Frank.

I don't think anyone is asking for every sample to be looped, but certainly having a small palette of workable looped "pad" strings in VSL would be great.

I imagine some keen users might even take the initiative, though I'd prefer to get it from VSL

Regards - Colin

The man hours thing from Herb is well noted,but what about the professional composer using this library,who finds time a precious enough commodity not to be taken up creating loops of his or her own?The library is big enough as it is and requires a considerable investment from its owner to set it up/customise it,etc.It's probably quicker to write out a score using a basic General MIDI set,but not as much fun (or inspirational),and the producer/directors nowadays,want to hear the finished thing...before it's finished!
Any help we can get in the way of time and labour saving would be most welcome.I for one will probably not be creating my own loops.

Two thumbs up for loops....at least some basic sets. The idea of purchasing a library of this scope is to NOT program .......but write.

Chris Luke

Hey everyone and thanks for this thread!
In full and humble appreciation of the VSL team (you guys are great!), I too would like to chime in and say that I am in need of extended length samples as well. Having these limited to a strategic, few looped sets is a wonderful idea. I hope we'll see some kind of solution to this issue in the near future. [:D]

Hey everyone and thanks for this thread!
In full and humble appreciation of the VSL team (you guys are great!), I too would like to chime in and say that I am in need of extended length samples as well. Having these limited to a strategic, few looped sets is a wonderful idea. I hope we'll see some kind of solution to this issue in the near future. [:D]

For the basic long sustains, sure, loops would be nice especially in the strings. Otherwise, I'd rather have the 10,000 man-hours spent creating new content. Especially since advanced time-stretching tools are just around the corner. Can you imagine how great it would be to have the power of Celemony's Melodyne in a software sampler? I think Roland's hardware sampler may even have this already.

I agree there are many technologies around the corner that could replace or help with sustaining strings & other instruments, but as for right now, I've already plunked down my $3,000 and I'd really appreciate being able to use these strings in a context where I don't have to worry about the notes dying out before I intend them to! If you look at my earlier post you'll see that I think I have a solution that would only take a few days for the VSL team to achieve, not 10,000 hours. Please feel free to take the minute to sign this petition for basic looped strings! I really think we need this! Thank you- Frank

Yep, I think a basic set of looped instruments and/or sections would be good. Where do I sign? [:)]

I'm not signing up on the "petition" because I know it means Herb and his team have to spend twice as much time on the PRO edition, which is a waste of time imo, but looped performance instruments would be handy. It's an endless task to loop a library as large as VSL.

There is a simple and better way of sustaining unlooped samples for eternity (if that's your wish) - Just hold the sustain pedal while you're playing the note and retrigger it without releasing the pedal, just a few seconds before the note ends. You will get a seamless loop without any trouble.

I agree that the performance samples need looping!

Thomas

Just bumping this thread in hopes of keeping the desire for a basic set of string loops on sustain and tremelo samples. C'mon, y'all, please sign up! If we get enough attention to this missing facet of an otherwise stellar library we may be able to actually use the string library in its entirety, and not have to mix the uniformed sound of these strings with Miroslav, Sonic Implants, or Garritan! Over 400 have viewed this thread so far; I can't believe that only a fraction of those reading this have no need for looped trems and sustains. Remember, all I'm asking for is a string ensemble of basses thru violins at mf having looped trems and sustain. Please help!!- Thanks, Frank

i won't actually own the vsl until this afternoon when it arrives in the mail (woohoo!) but i know that no matter how long the samples are, looped versions would always come in handy. & with the size of this library, it will be a cold day in hell before i go through all those samples & loop them myself.

i also understand the kind of manpower it would take to get this done - so i'll sign the petition, but while i'm waiting, i'll be blending notes with the sustain pedal, which is something natural for me anyway.

good luck (all of us) & kudos to herb/vsl team for the unprecedented work done so far.

I'm totally for having at least a minimum of loops for the most necessary elements. If the producers don't have time to do it, why not set up a user panel and split the work? Would this be possible? Can the loop info be shared seperately from the samples? Anyway, when I buy this library I'll be willing to do my part if it can be done...

Yeah, I agree if we don't get the makers of this library to do the right thing and provide a basic set of looped strings (at least!) then I guess I'll make my own set, at some point. It just irks me that we have to spend this much money for this library and not get something that seems like a basic requirement! Keep on posting for at least the basic looped strings and maybe we can change their minds in Vienna! Thanks.