I am wondering if Dietz or anyone else here agrees with this approach to creating a symphony-in-a-concert-hall type sound (as opposed to something smaller or more intimate).
I've come to the conclusion it is essential - not optional (and please argue if you disagree) to use mono samples of solo instruments that are situated within the orchestra. Not like a concerto, with a soloist who is up front, but with a solo that is heard from within the orhcestra. This is mainly because of the stereo image of a solo being gigantic when compared to the stereo image of a section. Obviously you have to use stereo for a violin section, but if the "concertmaster" decides to play a solo from among them, this has got to be mono solo violin from within that larger space, or you are distorting the acoustical perspective in a most unnatural way.
The most extremely audible instance of this I've heard is when I was using all stereo samples, that were perfectly panned and balanced, and had a large orchestral climax with an ff suspended cymbal crash. That cymbal sounded as if it were forty feet wide.
Isn't this principle necessary for all examples of the same thing?
I've come to the conclusion it is essential - not optional (and please argue if you disagree) to use mono samples of solo instruments that are situated within the orchestra. Not like a concerto, with a soloist who is up front, but with a solo that is heard from within the orhcestra. This is mainly because of the stereo image of a solo being gigantic when compared to the stereo image of a section. Obviously you have to use stereo for a violin section, but if the "concertmaster" decides to play a solo from among them, this has got to be mono solo violin from within that larger space, or you are distorting the acoustical perspective in a most unnatural way.
The most extremely audible instance of this I've heard is when I was using all stereo samples, that were perfectly panned and balanced, and had a large orchestral climax with an ff suspended cymbal crash. That cymbal sounded as if it were forty feet wide.
Isn't this principle necessary for all examples of the same thing?