@deswind said:
Just to be clear, I do not intend to use the VI with the Roland strings but INSTEAD of the roland strings. Would the Chamber strings work out well for this purpose? This is hard to explain in a post. But it should sound like a string section but not huge.
I understand.
VSL Strings in general do not sound "huge" per se. Even Orch I & II have a certain amount of intimacy, and this can see benefits with the use of some solo instruments in combo. I use different combos of all the strings to get a variety of textures and effects.
However, have you checked out the demos of Orch I/II and Chamber to compare the sound of each? Chamber *is* very nice, but only you can determine what constitutes "too small* or *too large* for your projects. Chamber's intimacy can get lost in a mix depending on what else is going on. It's a little hard to just pad with Chamber where its strongest aspects tend to be focused more on the linear detailing-- shaping melodic lines and counterlines.
At the same time, I've been able to get a certain amount of warmth out of Orch I/II without it getting to thick or heavy a string sound-- which would probably be more a case for Appassionata Strings anyway.
If prices were even on both, I'd recommend Orch I/II for general use. Chamber Strings (with some solo) would be nice for something like an "Elanor Rigby" arrangement... if that's the sound you want. It will also work well for a Bach, Mozart or Haydn type of string section, but it could sound thin on works of Beethoven or later...
What kind of music are you doing?
What other instruments are you mixing with these strings?