Will ONE licence allow me to run Altiverb on the main Daw and 4 slaves?
Nope. 1 licence per PC.
-
Nope. 1 licence per PC.
-
Will ONE licence allow me to run Altiverb on the main Daw and 4 slaves?
Nope. 1 licence per PC.
No problem Christian. I'll just leave Wizoo's W2 on the slaves (writing stage) - when the cue is done send over the audio files to the main daw and run Altiverb through then.
Any possible replies on the other questions as far as Altiverb running well on PC? (heard some horror stories). Going to upgrade my CPU on my main Daw to a Duo duo chip (and recommendations there on best price vs. value - i.e. - 3.0 Ghz duo duo's two times the price of the 2.8 duo duo's - thus not worth the extra .2 CPU advantage...)
Hope I am clear on this.
Rob
-
-
@Christian Marcussen said:
Well, I have no significant troubles with AV on windows.
Great Christian. Have you compared it to W2? Just trying to consider if I want to go to Altiverb - only to scrap it once MIR shows up.
Rob
-
No I havent, but I'm loving AV. As it became clear to me that MIR was far, far down the road I decided to buy several AV licences. I doubt I'll get MIR now, unless I'm rolling in money and the demos blow my mind [:)]
-
Christian, Why buy several lic's of AV? Can you just mix on your main Daw?
Looking forward to your reply.
Rob
-
I've found altiverb has the best sound of any convolution reverb, I don't know why, and I also think the built in EQ has a surprisingly excellent sound, (only works on the wet signal though) but it's great for quickly carving out a sound or fine tuning the reverb. I only used it on the Mac but mostly it's very good, I'm still using V5 though as I had some trouble with third party IR's in version 6 which they tell me are a bug and giong to be fixed.
Miklos.
-
@mpower88 said:
I've found altiverb has the best sound of any convolution reverb, I don't know why, and I also think the built in EQ has a surprisingly excellent sound, (only works on the wet signal though) but it's great for quickly carving out a sound or fine tuning the reverb. I only used it on the Mac but mostly it's very good, I'm still using V5 though as I had some trouble with third party IR's in version 6 which they tell me are a bug and giong to be fixed.
Miklos.
Thanks Miklos.
-
Yes, you see that on the product page...
quote.
I'm saving my pennies for this one!
Me too![:D]
P.S. Sorry, I'm not sure how to use the quote.
[/quote] [:O]ops:
-
Christian, Why buy several lic's of AV? Can you just mix on your main Daw?
Looking forward to your reply.
Rob
Because the sound from each slave comes into my slave as one source. So if I want to place each instrument in a virtual room I have to do it locally. Does the anser make sense?
For instance my Strings slave...If it all comes into my DAW I cant set Violins to the left, celli to th eright etc. Thats why on my slave I use AV's room feature to place them in the room, much like you could to with GigaPulse.
-
Christian, Why buy several lic's of AV? Can you just mix on your main Daw?
Looking forward to your reply.
Rob
Because the sound from each slave comes into my slave as one source. So if I want to place each instrument in a virtual room I have to do it locally. Does the anser make sense?
For instance my Strings slave...If it all comes into my DAW I cant set Violins to the left, celli to th eright etc. Thats why on my slave I use AV's room feature to place them in the room, much like you could to with GigaPulse.
Totally understand. What I was thinking is that each string section could be sent over one at a time to a seperate audio track within the main Daw and then IR processed then - plus this gives you some individual section 'mixing flexbility' later on (ability to adjust relative levels between sections).
Takes more time but just an idea maybe (save some money plus have more flexibility and control later on).
Rob
-
-
@Christian Marcussen said:
Ah sure thats entirely possible - but I don't have the patience [:)]
I hear ya - I'd much rather do it your way. Did you get a break on the additional lic's for the slaves?
Rob