At least you've time to read them, and "contribute" too
[8-)]

How could I not agree with you Laurent! I'm no better..
I spend way to much time reading & adding to the general mumbo jumbo...

And enjoying it... (At least)
En guerre contre les 'peines à jouir'..

Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-

BTW : While I'm here. I really think VSL should give us a VIP price on the standard edition. Obviously I'm not the only one.
They probably won't and I've already said I find this pretty unclassy.
Some will use the word 'unfair'.
Everyone understands what they mean but someone will obviously feel an incredible urge to start nit-picking on the words.. and moralize about how better than others they really understand things about life and business...
Thanks for enlightening us all !!!


Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-Chatter-

50/50 ?!?

How many companies could thrive if they alienated half of their existing customers?

I am sort of shocked that the number is this high in the poll.
Most offended VSL owners seemed to have given up and are posting here less and less.

If giga 4.0 and kontakt add speed control etc .......

I spent my morning scoring a piece with my pro edition. I love VSL.
But my anger over the abandonment of their stated promises has not subsided.
The funds I had set aside for the cube are instead going to other libs.

Fool me once ....
Not twice.

WHEN they release Opus VI .... I might buy that. But I will not invest another $6000 with a company that does not honor its long standing promises.

Ed, I think the same .I don't post cause I think they don't care.I simply won't upgrade from my Pro Edition to VI that's all; if a lot of existing users refused to upgrade they would reconsider their offer because it's a business and they need money.So we'll see......

@watercolours said:

if a lot of existing users refused to upgrade they would reconsider their offer because it's a business and they need money.So we'll see......

Well - that's a hell of a way to run a f**king railroad isn't it?

[8o|]

Well - that's a hell of a way to run a f**king railroad isn't it?

No, I don't think so;the fact is that to my opinion and other users, the upgrade path is not the way it could be expected from what was said in the VIP program etc.......so now the only way to make some pressure would be not upgrade, I don't see any other choice.
To be clear I love the VSL ProEdition and the new VI looks more than good, and I don't doubt that the guys at VSL are really involved in what they are doing and love their job.Saying it's a business is not intended as an offense but......if money was not a concern, we wouldn't even talk about that.They need money to keep going and we, users , need to work hard to buy these expensive products, and so again, I really think users of ProEdition deserve a better upgrade price.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but isn't the VI a new product, where the samples have been given new 'backbones' or whatever to make them function in the new interface?

However confusing it all may be (to me too), I'm under the impression that the Cube isn't merely a new color of the wrapper around it with the exact same content plus a little extra; but that all the samples which were recorded, had to be 're-adjusted' for the new 'player'... so that it is a new product after all.

Wes, I agree with you in many respects.
But ultimately its the same samples wrapped in new software which I would have been more than happy to pay a reasonable crossgrade fee to get.

But $5640 (my vip price) is not reasonable imho.

I think an interesting poll/question would be :

How many of us would have spent the money they spent on VSL products in the past had they known in advance about the current turn of events regarding the VSL VIP policy?

You don't have to dig very deep to figure out the answer...

Before, VSL were getting our money the nice way:
Now they decided they wanna try to get our money the ugly way.. And it seems they're going to stick to the ugliness..

Okay..

Clearly this doesn't wanna make me buy the stuff.
I would even say it makes me want to NOT BUY the stuff.
And the funny thing is that generally I'm a pretty tolerant chap. Easy going.

The fact that this new policy is making ME want to NOT BUY, tells me alot of people probably feel the same..

It isn't even a question of 'having the money' to buy the stuff.
It's just I feel it's an ugly way to try and get my money, so for the moment I really don't want to give it away..

from my perspective, yes the VI is a new product that wraps existing content plus quite a bit more. the problem is there aren't other options and vsl is attempting to force those who anticipated good faith access to upgrades into a completely different product if they want them. it isn't even so much a monetary issue as presenting the studio owner with the proposition of doing it the new VSL way or taking a hike.

the problem is this new thing, however legitimately innovative and attractive to some, isn’t even feasible to consider for others who face the proposition of rebuilding their studios around untried technology that limits access to the samples and penalizes its users with invasive copy protection from a company that now has an easily-discerned history of saying one thing and doing another (albeit conscionably imo). It makes their promises highly conditional and inconvenient to keep for too many, all at once, without warning, and departing from many tenants they have built their business upon. Ironically, I still like vsl and hope they will try to accommodate the users they appear to be in the process of disenfranchising. I’m not even angry, but unimpassioned analysis makes it clear that if a future point arrives where history shows they were unwilling to fix the present problems for all the users they have made promises to, the result will be an unconscionable legacy of deceptive trade practice.

So now that I’ve stepped into somewhat legal analysis, let me say that before “retiring” to devote my energy to music, I was a general partner of a law firm. So I speak with a degree of experience in saying THE basic tenant of international contract law is something called the Doctrine of Reliance. Generally that means that contracts are formed by one party relying on the fulfillment of promises by the other. The interesting thing is that there doesn’t have to be any underlying intent for a breech or even fraud to occur. Translating that to VSL, it means they are legally obligated to fulfill their - specific - promises where it can be shown that others relied on them, i.e., gave them money. So for me the question of whether VSL is being fair or unfair remains to be seen. And while there is no law that says I have to use their new technology, there is certainly a vast body of law that says they have to keep their commitments however inconvenient or costly and regardless of intent.