Ah, the brilliant Brit chimes with insightful wit.
Liberace would not concur though I couldn't agree more.
DC
Liberace would not concur though I couldn't agree more.
DC
196,700 users have contributed to 43,030 threads and 258,429 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 6 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 91 new user(s).
@dpcon said:
Ah, the brilliant Brit chimes with insightful wit.
Liberace would not concur though I couldn't agree more.
DC
@hermitage59 said:
Nice to see your mum's an enlightened, intelligent, forward thinking human being, being a mac user!
Regards to you, and best wishes for a speedy resolution in your internet journey!
Regards,
Alex.
Not accepted. Music is created in a certain context and also listened in a certain context. If those don't match there may be a learning process or not. So what is "music" is subjective matter (to the listener).@weslldeckers said:
I think music is:
any sound, sounds or combination of sounds that are made by someone and which give some form to, that part of ones creativity that needs an outlet through sound(s).
@lgrohn said:
OK. What I justs tried to tell is: The definition of music can't be that something is music if someone just tells it is music.
Not accepted. Music is created in a certain context and also listened in a certain context. If those don't match there may be a learning process or not. So what is "music" is subjective matter (to the listener).@weslldeckers said:
I think music is:
any sound, sounds or combination of sounds that are made by someone and which give some form to, that part of ones creativity that needs an outlet through sound(s).
@William said:
I tend to agree with the idea of weslldeckers. But maybe my own general definition would be:
Music is the organization of sound for artistic purposes.
Which is rather vague, but probably has to be. Anything more specific becomes an axe-grinding agenda on the part of the person doing the definition, for example the competing definitions of Atonalism, Serialism, Neo-classicism, Hip-Hop, Psychobilly, etc.