Thanks for the acknowledgement,Mathis.I personally don't feel it's too derivative of Strawinskie,given its context ,and the fact that at least half of it owes more to Holst detracts from that even further,I feel.Actually,there are composers of (currently [[;)]] )far higher profile than myself who have been blatent in their plagiarism of I.S,so I guess I'm in good company.I cited Henze's Undine earlier in this thread which,to my ears, is tantamount to theft (Symphony In Three Movements).Also,John Adams springs readily to mind in his lifting of the Symphony In Three Movements (there's that work again):just listen to the Chairman Mao Dances (to name but one instance of unsubtle "borrowing") to appreciate this.I'm more of a Steve Reich man myself;much more.This is a symphonic vernacular,being exploited in the production music field,which has become a filmic device or slang that the "public" recognise,but have no requirement to analyse.In,say,Henze's case:he really should know better.
It's,though:I haven't a single original thought in my head [:'(]
Anyway,I'll take it as a kind of compliment,thanks.BTW:your trilogy of very interesting pieces:can you explain the meaning of the slightly baffling and protracted section in the waltz,viz:the sirens? I'm intrigued.
weslldeckers:heard the music.Here's the context thing again...I didn't like the S/H synth sound,but in context I expect its function to be revealed and appropriate.The music,other than that,was fine indeed,though I didn't think the production was too good.Sorry to be negative on that score,since I always wrestle against that aspect of getting my pieces finished.