Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

194,118 users have contributed to 42,911 threads and 257,916 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 13 new post(s) and 81 new user(s).

  1. Home
  2. Sample Libraries
  3. Synchron Series
  4. Synchron Pianos on ARM Macs?

  • Synchron Pianos on ARM Macs?

    M
    M

    Hi vienna (and everybody else)!

    I need a new laptop for on-stage purpose.

    I just bought two of the new synchron pianos (Bösendorfer Imperial and upright) and my old mac is definitively too slow. It does still work reasonable well with a few old libraries, although I have the impression that it becomes more and more unstable.

    So I do need a replacement. If apple hadn't announced its new ARM platform, I would buy a MacBook Pro 13 with a lot of RAM and SSD storage. Now.

    However, when spending that much money, I want to use it for at least the next 6-7 years or so. I fear that, in a few years, new software will only be available for the new macs, not for the old intel platform.

    Of course, I will not buy a new "apple silicon" mac before it is official that the software I need (and I specifically want to use the synchron pianos) is compatible with it. So I have to wait. But if it were already clear that it will take longer before compatibility is official (lets say more than 6 months), I would consider buying an intel machine now.

    Any hints?

    I am sure, someone has tested vsl software on the mac mini test machine...
  • M
    M

    Considering that it will most likely be quite some time before Apple introduces silicon powerful enough to replace the Mac Pro line, you'll most likely see developers keeping support for Intel CPU's up until at least 5 years after the last Intel Mac Pro is shipped.

    My guess is that Apple will keep selling Intel Mac Pro's for another 3 years, so something like 8 years of Intel support would be expected from devs. Not sure how long Apple want to keep supporting Intel in macOS however, but I doubt they'll kill support for the last Mac Pro's that quickly.

    Also remember, that developers will still have to develop x86_64 code in order to support Windows. Given this, supporting Intel alongside ARM isn't too much of an issue.
  • M
    M

    Thank you very much for your response!

    After reading your response, I often felt tempted to buy a x86 MacBook. However, one thing made me wait: I want to be able to have my system running nonstop, because I want my children being able to spontaneously go to the keyboard and play without asking someone to start the computer. And my hope is that the new machines produce less heat and works well without a fan, so I would feel better when I leave the computer on for a long period of time.

    Tomorrow we'll see.

    If the new system isn't 100% compatible with old software (e.g. are there issues with eLicenser? Can I run a native version of MainStage and use it with x86-VSTs?), I'll get an x86 MacBook. Perhaps their prices drop soon.

    Otherwise, I am eager to get an Apple Silicon MacBook...
  • R
    R
    Martin, Thanks for the insights. As a VSL Software Developer, could you tell us if you will be/you are currently working on VSL software and libraries etc for the new silicon Macs? If I decide to purchase an Intel MacBook Pro 16 for instance, and that has silicon CPU, will that mean current software will still work with that ARM based Mac? Or will we have to wait until you / various other developers are ready for making their software compatible with silicon Macs? If we have to wait then it might be better to get an Intel Mac at the moment. Forgive my lack of knowledge about the engineering side of things :)
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC
    last edited
    last edited

    I have watch the Apple conference and they say you can run any Intel code ! faster ??? good question !

    Let see what the audio Software suppliers are saying

    I am a member of the Core audio conference develloper at Apple, let see what they talk about ðŸ˜Š

    VSL is sometime a bit chilly to new technology, specially when they cannot charge for Developpement ; the last examples are NKS and Dorico Expression Maps, they are only available on Synchron base libraries and that after many year that the technology is available .

    User that have paid many thousandS of euro on VI library and MIR can just sit down and cry ðŸ˜¢

     

    Imagine a 4 x Mac mini (one for string, one for brass, one for wind and one for percussions and keyboards) running a full orchestra at 4 x 699 $/799 € (4x8 = 32 cores......) using  Thunderbolt to the master !!!! WOW

    You do not need a 24 000 € Macpro
  • G
    G
    last edited
    last edited

    Hello,

    I think there are in fact a few questions here:

    - QT: it's the software cross platform framework on which Synchron Player is based on (like other softwares like Dorico, Cubase, Sibelius, ...): currently at version 5, a beta version 6 juste came to life (20th October) and could possibly support macOS Big Sur: QT will support it, but no release date for now.

    - CoreAudio: as Cyril Blanc said, the macOS audio API evolutions on Big Sur and/or ARM-based Macs could take time for developers to implement and be compatible with it

    - Sound card: according to possible CoreAudio modifications, drivers should be updated and perhaps some sound cards won't be compatible

    - eLicenser: this can also take time to make it usable on ARM based Macs

    Regards,

    Gil.
  • M
    M

    and there'll be another issue:

    M1 based MACs are limited to 16GB RAM while my favourite libraries (Bösendorfer Imperial & upright) recommend 32GB.

    So: either x86 now or Apple Silicon and waiting indefinitely
  • G
    G

    I'm adding there that before all the software becoming native to ARM architecture, Rosetta 2 could be a temporary solution (if all the things are running correctly on it).
  • B
    B

    I'd also be very interested in a native Synchron player. Both my (fast) PC and 5,1 Mac do not have enough power to play the Steinway with acceptable latency.
  • C
    C

    The early reviews of Logic and Final Cut running on Apple silicon are really impressive. I'm hoping that VSL starts with porting VE Pro to Apple silicon, when that happens I'll run Logic on a new Mac and host VI's on my Windows workstations.
  • B
    B

    Can somone try their Synchron Pianos on an M1 Mac using Rosetta 2, and get back to us with a performance/latency report?

    If it's usable/better than existing intel Macs I may just sell my 5,1 and get a new Mac Mini.

    Thanks!
  • T
    T

    RE:  porting VE Pro to Apple silicon

     

    I’ve been playing with this idea for a few days on a new MINI. VEP 7 is working under Rosetta and doing a good job bridging to Vi’s and other plugins that don’t like the new silicon. I have also tried the ARM version of Reaper with similar results. Pro Tools 20.11 is also running (under Rosetta), and again VEP 7 works as a bridge to Intel servers.

     

    This is all promising, but the results will be much better when the plugins are ported to Universal Binary. Combining native-ARM DAWs and Rosetta plugins is working, but has a significant hit compared to running 100% native.

     

    Moving all Vienna Symphonic Library software to Universal Binary is undoubtedly a large project, but porting VP 7 plugins would be an excellent place to start. This would help large numbers of musicians transition to the new Macs. I know many music producers who initially became interested in VEP to help bridge their transition to 64 bit when many of their plugins were still 32 bit. The same type of interest could be generated today by helping to bridge to the new silicon.
  • R
    R
    Mat, did you try the Synchron Pianos on M1? I bought an intel MacBook Pro 16, 64GB Ram, i9 and 2TB storage, only to find that no DAW on Mac will recognised my MAYA44 eX PCIe interface, housed in a Startech TB3 chassis. It wouldn’t let me adjust my buffer to get under 10ms which I wanted as a a pianist. It forces Core Audio driver over any other. I also had sluggish/unusable Cubase 10 Pro perform until I upgraded to 11. M1 under Rosetta didn’t load ANY Native Instruments hosts/instruments as of a couple of weeks back. Been with Apple 3 years but returned it and now happier with a Dell XPS with 4TB NVMe running Synchron pianos (with my external thunderbolt card) at between 2-5ms and on an i7-8750H. I’m interested to know the performance of M1 chips with VSL. Especially VEPro.
  • F
    F

     

    I actually did try synchron Pianos on my Macmini M1 16Gb, and I didn't notice any difference with my MacBook Pro 2019 i9 32Gb.

    Only problem is my Audio interface has not yet a reliable/supported ASIO audio driver for silicon macOs, then I can't say if latency and buffer parameters are correct. But loading was fast and playback fine with 64k (overload with long sustain pedal reaching more than 300 voices) and perfect with 128k buffer, and my Kawai VP-1 was very responsive and natural to play.

    All the rest of VSL software is running surprisingly good as I'm reporting in another post.
  • M
    M

    fatis,

    this is good news! This also means that licenser works without problems, right?

    I am using lots of vst within MainStage (intel Mac). I am wondering if, on an M1 mac, it is possible to run rosetta-based VSTs within a native app like MainStage. Have you tried this?

    BTW, perfect choice: VP-1 with synchron pianos! To my eyes there is currently no better solution!
  • F
    F
    last edited
    last edited

    @mat123 said:

    fatis,

    this is good news! This also means that licenser works without problems, right?

    I am using lots of vst within MainStage (intel Mac). I am wondering if, on an M1 mac, it is possible to run rosetta-based VSTs within a native app like MainStage. Have you tried this?

    BTW, perfect choice: VP-1 with synchron pianos! To my eyes there is currently no better solution!

    Yes no problems on my system with the elicenser: all working fine, including steinberg licenses I have on the same key.

    Yes native Apple audio software is running a bridge (kind of sub-rosetta) for VSTs and AUs. When it creates compatibility issues, you may still run the whole app in rosetta mode, and it will increase even more the number of viable plugins (e.g. my VOCALOID-5 works only if the host is running in Rosetta, it's common for the plug-ins with large and non standard GUI etc.)

    Yes VP-1 and Synchron pianos is a top combination, I really love it:  I had and used several digital pianos but this is the closer-to-real feeling I ever had.
  • W
    W

    I have tried the Synchron Piano on the M1 MacBook Pro - it will play but the sound seems off somehow and there is a latency that I did not get on my Intel Mac. So I am anxiously waiting for VSL to issue a native apple silicon player.
  • M
    M

    Yesterday, I tried Synchron Pianos on M1 MacBook Pro.

    elicenser worked without problems.

    Installing and starting Synchron Pianos was no problem either.

    But first, with macOS 12.2.0, I couldn't select USB-MIDI in Synchron Piano Preferences while USB-MIDI worked well with other software such as garage band.

    After updating macOS to 12.2.1 this bug immediately disappeared. Unfortunately, the update broke my external aufio interface (Behringer XR-18).

    Using the internal audio instead, I felt there is a small latency that wasn't there with Intel, just as WilliamMcVey has reported.

    Let's see what further updates will bring...
  • F
    F

    Intersting to notice that both of you have Powerbooks.

    I didn't experience your issues (but some small incompatibility with the missing Driver of Steinberg UR22C), but I'm using a Macmini.

    I'm using it for some weeks now, and stressed a bit the system, and all sounds good up to now.
  • M
    M

    Let me make clear that the performance of synchron piano on the M1 macbook is good! The latency is there, but it is small, I'm just very exacting.

    What bothers me more is that my audio interface does no longer work after the macOS update.