Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

183,088 users have contributed to 42,273 threads and 254,977 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 0 new thread(s), 3 new post(s) and 49 new user(s).

  • Thanks, Dietz, that's clear and helpful.


    Hobbyist ... Sy Woods, Brass, Perc I, Str Pro, Elite Str, Duality Str & Sordino, Prime ... Sy-ized Woods, Perc, Solo Str, Ch Str, App Str, Harps, Choir, Dim Brass, Dim Strings ... VE Pro, MIR Pro 3D, Vienna Suite Pro ... Cubase 12, Studio One 6, Dorico 5
  • I am seriously thinking of purchasing MIR but when I discovered to my dismay first on my own and then from reading this thread that I can't have separate instances of VE pro all appear on one stage in MIR I am a little disconcerted.  I had initially set up my template following Beat Koffman's suggestions about creating a VE pro for Strings, Winds, Brass, etc. and I am really comfortable working this way, even adding instruments when needed. I was hoping to be able to use the full "built in" version of MIR Pro in Vienna Ensemble for my orchestra template, not be relegated to using the conventional VST/AU plug-in. Is there anyway I can merge all my instances of Vienna Ensemble so I can take advantage of the full, automatic capabilities of MIR and still see all my instruments on one stage?

    Thanks,

    Becky


  • In short: No, not yet. Quite possible that a future update of VE Pro / MIR Pro will offer functionality like that, though.


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • What is the most straightforward way to route a full orchestra through MIR since all the instruments can't be included in just one instance of Vienna Ensemble? Thanks!


  • Well - you _could_ have just one instance of VE Pro in most cases ;-) (unless you use slave computers), but I understand why some people prefer to have seperate VI frames for various reasons.

    Like I wrote above: If you have several instances of VE Pro on the same machine and want to see all instruments in one single MIR interface, you can use MIR Pro's plug-in version instead of the one integrated into VE Pro. Alternatively, you can use a dedicated instance of MIR Pro inside each instance of VE Pro.

    In case your workflow asks for slave machines, you will either have to take resort to audio inputs into your main VE Pro (the one that hosts MIR Pro), or you get additional licenses of MIR Pro (or MIR Pro 24) for the slaves.

    Kind regards,


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • Thanks Dietz.  I only have Vienna Ensemble, didn't realize you can do what I want with Ensemble Pro. No wonder I've been confused.


  • Oh - sorry. It wasn't my intention to make things more confusing than they are (... so many possibilities ... 8-) ...).


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • I had the exact question actually - and I spotted this thread which is now about 18 months old -

    So I just wondered - has this been updated? Is it possible to share a single MIR session across a range of instance tabs in VEPro6 yet?


  • Hi Richard, 

    Unfortunately not possible yet, there were too many other tasks on the plate (right now, Synchron Player is in the focus). 

    Sorry to have no better news. 

    Best,
    Paul


    Paul Kopf Product Manager VSL
  • Hi Paul .. I have the same question. How about now? Almost a year and a half since the last post ... Any progress in sharing a single MIR session across a range of instance tabs in VEPro6 yet ... or possibly in the new VEP7 when it is released? Thanks, Rich Mercado


  • It would be really useful to have multiple instances meet on the same MIR stage. Is this still not possible with VEP7?

    Is everyone using the plugin version to get round this? Duplicating an integrated MIR venue for each instance seems a bit cumbersome.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Lucy said:

    [...] Is everyone using the plugin version to get round this? [...]

    That's indeed the only way to achieve this ATM, sorry to say so.


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library