When I bought "Solo Strings 1" a few years ago, I composed a little piano quintet to use and explore the library. A few weeks ago I tried it again (for the second violin I use now violin 2). In the past years I tried also libraries of other companies, especially other violins and another cello. But with the instruments of VSL I got the best results until now. I hope you enjoy.
-
Piano quintet
-
Just puting something online made myself a very critical listener 🤔. Reason to work further on my piece of music. Here is the result...
This is a very nice composition. Attractive melody, nice form, good use of the quintet. Thanks for posting this.
-
A very clean neoclassical composition. Often I wonder why I must be a quintet, since what I hear seemed to me more or less a Duo or Trio. I think some aspects of development and dramaturgic architecture might also be helpful to improve this composition.
Here you can find two pianoquintets of the Brahms-student Robert Kahn realised with VSL, which might be perhaps interesting for you if you like to do chambermusic and especially Pianoquintets with VSL:
Robert Kahn two Pianoquintets realised with VSL
I hope you like them.
merry Christmas
Steffen
-
When I bought "Solo Strings 1" a few years ago, I composed a little piano quintet to use and explore the library. A few weeks ago I tried it again (for the second violin I use now violin 2). In the past years I tried also libraries of other companies, especially other violins and another cello. But with the instruments of VSL I got the best results until now. I hope you enjoy.
Very enjoyable! MMKA, I have become a fan of your music. I love your melodies, some Schumannesque qualities. Nice flow, really charming piece.
I like it when the piano comes in, it breaks from the dotted quarter note pattern, I think in the middle you could of broken longer from the main theme pattern by developping on some smaller fragment so when the main theme reappears, you welcome more this pattern, but that could be more personal.
Keep posting, great stuff.
-
-
wonderful quality of Schumann.???????
Just to remind what you are talking about:
This is Schumanns Pianioquintett:
(here my poor little rendering of its Scherzo with Eastwest-Samples from 2008)
Of course Schuman is for all of us a very inspiring ideal when it comes to good chambermusic but to reach "Schumannesque Qualities" - to be realistic - there is Imho in many aspects (harmonic and melodic invention, counterpoint, disposition of the ensemble, architecture, virtuosity and passion) still very very much to do.
I was a bit more reminded in what I would expect of Franz Xaver Mozart (whose Pianoquartet is not bad), or Johann Nepomuk Hummel (whose texture seem to be in many aspects much nearer to MMKA even if there is still enough for instance of brilliance, musical contrast and development what might be still inspiring for MMKA Pianoquintett). But I am sure MMKA's very clean style might be a goiod starting point to develop a chambermusical thinking like those two mentioned late classical composers.
-
I didn't say it's exactly like Schumann or as genius as Schumann, I said the melodies has some Shumannesque qualities, as well as the other lovely piano piece I listened on the Composer Challenge thread, remeniscent of Childhood Scenes simplicity melodies, of course it's a crossover with other styles, but I stand by what I said. Perhaps you read too fast my comment and skipped over the word "melody"?
BTW MMKA, I didn't mention it on the other thread, but was thinking this, when I use to give piano lessons, I would of asked you permission for your piano piece, I'm sure my students would of loved it.
-
Hi,
I really enjoyed your piano quintet, as to melody shaping, instrumentation and midi performance. You did a terrific job. Whether it is 'Schumannesque' or 'whoeveresque' doesn't matter at all. It has been said a million times: all music resembles in some way to other already composed music. As long as it is only in style, there is nothing wrong with being compared to a giant like Schumann. I would be a little prudent to say such things, it is in fact MMKA-ish and as long as the author feels comfortable in this styles, his music will be OK. Why do we always want to compare? Just let the music speak and enjoy!!! And this piece is very enjoyable.
Jos
-
Just to be 100% clear, and this is always what happens when people do not read your post carefully or misquote you.
I specifically said about the melodies, not the contrapuntal work, or structure, or harmony or orchestration etc. As a composer I hear some traits of Schumann regarding melodies. People are constantly giving me composers referrences to my works, so what? I don't think my works are the same level as Rachmaninov or Tchaikovsky just because there are some things in common, and noone else will think this.
-
Hi Guy,
Sorry if I misunderstood your words, but still I think we share the same opinion. There are always comparisons, but I just wanted to say that is hardly ever intentional and even less deliberate. Willing or not, we are all influenced by what we hear and one way or the other we adopt phrases, turns, tunes, themes... But that doesn't actually matters. It's the own creativity that counts and the final result of course. But I guess that discussion has been completed here in the forum, so please let's not end up in another polemic, that would be the least thing I want.
Best wishes!
Jos
-
Hey fahl5 -
I don't need you to tell me or remind me anything about Robert Schumann. Your posts always assume total superiority on your part which is an egregious error.
Hi William ....playing the angry old man again?
If this is the way you can't resist to present yourself here again and again ... your problem😛
-
Remember those two old guys on the balcony from the Muppet Show? 😃
