@McArnes said:
There seem to be a few tutorials on how to make a template in Cubase with VEP, but very little with Logic (?). That's probably not a good enough reason to get Cubase instead as I already have Logic Pro X. Having said that, I don't know much about Logic even if I've had it for some years. I have actually more experience with FL Studio than Logic, but Fl Studio on Mac is not ready yet. All I've done in Logic is recording some ideas, and the little I tried with the piano roll and automation was so different from FL Studio that I lost some motivation.I wonder if any of these DAWs are best when it comes to working with VEP?I will have the daw on the master Mac, and VEP is on the slave PC.Is it all about preferences, or is Cubase better as most ppl seem to use that with VEP? I've read that in Logic there's a limit on number of MIDI ports, so each instance in VEP can only have 16 channels. If I've understand it correctly.
I'm VSL Certified and have clients from all parts, especially Hollywood, and the four most popular DAWs for composer are Cubase, Logic, Digital Performer and Pro Tools (yes, Pro Tools).
They all have great things about them and I'm always looking over the fence to see what I'm missing. That being said, don't ignore Digital Performer. It has some features that you'll wonder how you ever lived without. I believe DP is the most effcieient with VE PRO on macOS, (I have no numbers to back that up), but DP is better optimized for macOS than Cubase, and DP allows for 48 MIDI ports which means you get 768 MIDI channels per VEP instance, (whereas Logic only allows 1 MIDI port per instance, which I see you already know). Jay may a workaround for that that he uses, (other than the Event Input).
No DAW is perfect, although there are many workarounds too improve each. Out of the box, I'm upset that Apple rarely updates their AU spec and limits Logic to 1 MIDI port, (clearly documented on Apple's Developer website. But Logic has the best Score Editor IMO, although DP's and Cubase's are pretty good. I also like the overall interface. I enjoy working in Logic.
Digital Performer is sometimes seen as an old school DAW, with separate MIDI and Instrument channels. However, is a blessing in disguise, IMO. DP is very deep. But, oh boy, I wish they'd fix that tiny 1988 font problem. I'm not even that old and I strain to read some of DP's text! Wish more developers would support MAS, like VSL (bless you VSL), and AudioEase do, when it's more than just a wrapper issue. DP is deep, deep, deep..
Cubase is a wonderful DAW, especially with it's well integrated VST3 implantation. Thank goodness for Cusbasis on iOS. I find DP and Cubase so close in a lot of ways, but am a 25 year DP user, (v1.7) and there's no prying me away now.
My point is, don't sleep on Digital Performer. It's powerful. It might be a bit intimidating to new users, but you can try the free 30 day downloadable demo and see for yourself.
Not starting a DAW war here. Trust me. I love the BIG THREE and use them all (especially when I want to shake things up). Just wanted to suggest you take a look at DP.
Best wishes,
Steve Steele
VSL Certified Vienna Ensemble Pro Template Builder