Hi Badibeat,

Thanks for your thoughtful suggestions! From a technical point-of-view I absolutely understand what you're asking for. :-) Actually I would _love_ to expand MIR into the realm of 3D-audio, especially considering the fact that "Ambisonics" etc. wasn't on many people's radar when VSL started to develop the undelying techniques more than 15 years ago. *sigh*

But please keep in mind that the majority of MIR-users aren't tech-savvy at all, and reading the mails that reach VSL support I assume that most of them would vote for "more presets" rather than "more possibilites" ...

That said, I think it's safe to say that MIR will see some big enhancements in the not-too-distant future, given the fact that its engine uses Ambisonics throughout the whole signal path anyway.

Still I don't expect "Kunstkopf" or other quite specialised formats to be high on the list of the development team, to be honest. What _will_ make sense is the option to give the user access the undecoded output stream, allowing for any kind of further processing in the Ambisonics domain. Just don't hold your breath, please, as it will take some time until these new features will see the day of light ... 

Thanks again for your input, and kind regards,

Hi Dietz

Thank you very much for your resoponse. I recognized MIR's potetial immediately and hope there's more than new venues to come, as you suggested.

Accessing the ambisonic domain would actually be the most universal solution. I am also waiting for a Nuendo update that is finally able to handle Higer Order Ambisonic tracks. 

I have the impression that the gaming industry still has the lead in this field, and from my experiences a lot of VSL products are used to produce game soundtracks.

I think the majority of people just never experienced true binaural recordings. In comparison rigging up stuff like xx+y speakers is just a compromise. Many people nowadays listen a lot through earphones, to stuff which was sadly produced for speakers.

By the way, it's perfectly viable to use headphones together with a subwoofer to experience the full physical impact of sound ;)

@badibeat said:

[...] I have the impression that the gaming industry still has the lead in this field, and from my experiences a lot of VSL products are used to produce game soundtracks. [...]

... I will quote you as often as possible!

Here's another user that would be very interested in that feature. I suppose that it would not be very difficult to implement a binaural conversion inside MIR, after the ambisonics processing that is already implemented as the hearth of the software, you will need just a decoder into the binaural format, where now is only possible to get stereo/dolby, right?
I can imagine it would require some resources, but I think that could put MIR on a whole new prospective.
Personally I could not think to a better software to finally blend together two aspects of my work, that at the moment I have to keep separated in 2 different workflows: composinga with virtual instruments and working with "spatial music".

Thanks for adding your voice, Fabio.

@FabioA said:

[...] now is only possible to get stereo/dolby, right? [...] 

... errr ... Dolby?

@FabioA said:

[...] now is only possible to get stereo/dolby, right? [...] 

... errr ... Dolby?

wooops! Surround! 😖

@LAJ said:

[....] (Dietz' MIR-Nightmare since he always said that "moving" MIR Icons on stage are no topic)[...]

Well - to keep things in perspective: Of course it would be great to have the option for seamlessly moving Icons on a MIR Pro Venue, without interrupting the audio signal derived from them. What I tried to point out in previous answers to this question is that - looking on the underlying engine components - this is quite hard to achieve.

Given the fact that MIR has been developed with virtual orchestration in mind, it's quite obvious that we decided not to overcomplicate things any further, because there's little use for this feature in the targeted scenario.

... but never say never! 😊

Kind regards,

@FabioA said:

[...] now is only possible to get stereo/dolby, right? [...] 

... errr ... Dolby?

wooops! Surround! 😖

Ah! That makes sense. 😊