194,421 users have contributed to 42,920 threads and 257,965 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 85 new user(s).
All MIRx settings are available as presets within MIR Pro, and much of MIRx' automatisms are implemented since the last upate, too. The migration from 'x to 'Pro should be straight-forward.
-> http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/p/36432/224093.aspx#224093
HTH,
@Dietz said:
All MIRx settings are available as presets within MIR Pro, and much of MIRx' automatisms are implemented since the last upate, too. The migration from 'x to 'Pro should be straight-forward.
-> http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/p/36432/224093.aspx#224093
HTH,
That seems to be exactly what I was hoping for. Thank you.
@Dietz said:
All MIRx settings are available as presets within MIR Pro, and much of MIRx' automatisms are implemented since the last upate, too. The migration from 'x to 'Pro should be straight-forward.
-> http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/p/36432/224093.aspx#224093
HTH,
Does MIRx Mode in the plug-in version of MIR Pro yield exactly identical results as MIRx, or is it an approximation?
Also, which of MIRx' automatisms are not implemented in MIRx Mode (when using the plug-in version of MIR Pro)?
Also, which of MIRx' automatisms are not implemented in MIRx Mode (when using the plug-in version of MIR Pro)?
All Instrument Profiles and its related features have to be assigned manually, as the plug-in has no way of knowing its input data (... MIR Pro can "talk" to the VI(Pro) in its channel when used in VE Pro).
HTH,
@BachRules said:
Also, which of MIRx' automatisms are not implemented in MIRx Mode (when using the plug-in version of MIR Pro)?
All Instrument Profiles and its related features have to be assigned manually, as the plug-in has no way of knowing its input data (... MIR Pro can "talk" to the VI(Pro) in its channel when used in VE Pro).....
In practice, this means that when using plug-in MIR Pro, I'd just need to manually select the correct instrument-name from a list?
MIRx is a great help to me; good to know I could get the same results out of MIR Pro. Thanks.
@BachRules said:
Does MIRx Mode in the plug-in version of MIR Pro yield exactly identical results as MIRx, or is it an approximation?
In principle the results will be identical. MIR Pro plug-in version has a known bug in its RoomEQ assignement which will give you slightly different wet signals. - This bug doesn't appear in the VE-based version, and it will be fixed in the next update of MIR Pro anyway.
Is there a workaround for the bug, like if I manually select RoomEQ? In the Instrument sections? Or in the Room section? I have not mastered RoomEQ yet, it's not clear to me how the settings should look.
