Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

194,395 users have contributed to 42,918 threads and 257,959 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 6 new post(s) and 83 new user(s).

  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Vienna MIR & Vienna Suite
  4. Need help deciding which pc as slave for mir pro
  • I
    I
    Big THX to you both! And yes, the question was about a considerably prized slave. The only affordable xeon system would be a used dual xeon e5520 (not the newest system), which would cost as much as a new i7 4770k system. And I was wondering, if maybe the xeon architecture fits the way mir pro is working beter. Because its the chipset recommended from the vsl mir system specs page. On the other side, the "vsl approved" (audionetworx) systems also use the i7 4770k and the much, much more expensive new xeons. But as things look right now, it seems for me, that the i7 would be better choice. Because I think (after lookiong at some different benchmarks and dietz´s expirience) that the newer i7 outperformes the older e5520. Yes, it has 8 threads less, but it is much higher clocked. To make things short, after 3 days of intensive internet research, I am still totally confused. But again, THANK YOU GUYS!
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC
    last edited
    last edited

    @Itcantrainallthetime said:

    after 3 days of intensive internet research, I am still totally confused. But again!

    I am not surprized that you are totally confused.

    What is VERY important is disk I/O too, you NEED a SSD or a raid of SSD for large orchestra
  • I
    I
    Really? Also if i am streaming the vsl library samples on my master? (because that one has a ssd) Or are the impulseresponses that big so they won´t fit into 24 or 32gb of ram?
  • DietzD
    VSL Team
    DietzD

    SSDs are great, but MIR Pro itself hardly benefits from them.

    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • I
    I
    Oh, i also made a mistake. Audionetworx recommends the i7 3930k (which is your cpu, dietz) and that one has 4 threads more than the i7 4770k. ;(
  • I
    I
    Sorry to bother you again, but do you have an idea, from what mir pro would profit more. clock of cpu or number of cores? i mean, i am working with logic 9 and am therefore seeing lots of unused cores, whreeas on is always nearly burning. could you maybe tell me, if mir pro is using all cores (also virtual ones) equally? Thanks again!
  • DietzD
    VSL Team
    DietzD

    Logic is pretty much the only recent audio application which shows this - uhm - somewhat peculiar behaviour (AFAIK). ;-)

    IOW: Yes, MIR Pro will use as many threads as you assign in its Preferences.

    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • DietzD
    VSL Team
    DietzD

    ... and to answer your question: MIR will benefit from raw processing power (the highest possible speed an as many cores as possible) AND (!) from fast RAM. Lots of data to compute ...

    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • muziksculpM
    muziksculpM
    last edited
    last edited

    @Dietz said:

    MIR Pro works great with many "average" modern i7-based machines. During a recent test I had almost 50 Icons on MIR stage while mixing in 5.0 (i.e. surround without LFE) @ 44.1 kHz. ASIO- and MIR's own latency were set to 1024 samples. That left plenty of resources to run Nuendo on the same machine (i7 3930K @ 3.2 GHz with 32 GB RAM).

    I can run over 130 Icons on the samy system when I work in stereo.

    Kind regards,

    Hi Dietz,

    Are you actually playing in midi data while MIR Pro and your ASIO buffers are set to 1024 ?  or are you using ASIO & MIR Pro at 1024 after you have your project recorded at a lower buffer, and then using MIR Pro & ASIO (at 1024) to place the instruments into the MIR Pro stage ? 

    I'm asking this, because I find it uncomfortable/odd to perform, or record in real time while ASIO buffer is set at 1024. 

    Your feedback on this important detail would be very helpful.

    Thanks,

    Muziksculp 
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC

    HI Dietz

     Mir pro may not need SSD but VE PRO DOES need it ! As MIR need VE PRO !

    Otherwise you will have to wait 1/2 hour to load a 100 instrument template and you will need to have a lot of memory

    Havind ssd you will reduce the preload buffer size, needing less memory, avoiding to swap !
  • I
    I
    As for the ssds... yeah, but ... in the meantime i can take a cup of coffee in the morning. and i don´t want to load 2 stages at the same time, so i guess i can wait until all the responses are loaded. (if one room is less then 32gb of ram???) @dietz: haha ... you just bootet me me kind of back to basis line. But this still helps. As I see it now ... trying to add 1 and 1 ... this means 8 times 3.5ghz (i7 4770k) is nice but 16 times 2,26/2.53(tb) is nicer. Thanks a lot guys!!! ;)
  • I
    I
    I am interested too. Because I know that playing the midi- keyboard at a buffer size at 1024 doesn´t "REALLY" work. But I got used to play with a latency of 512 buffers. Again, BIG THANKS for sharing your expierience!!
  • DietzD
    VSL Team
    DietzD

    Don't forget that you can always bypass MIR Pro inside VE Pro on one selected channel for playing an instrument live, putting it back on stage afterwards (or just for listening back). That way, you can have MIR Pro using large latencies without experiencing lagging notes while playing on your keyboard. It's just one mouseclick ...

    Best, 

    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • I
    I
    I just wanted to keep you updated. After all your tips! ;) Finally I decided that the i7 4930k would be the best choice. The whole thing is a little bit more expensive, but I thought, what the heck! ;) So once again ... A Big thanks to you Guys!!