Paul says it's not a good idea to pause and restart, as the bump in speed is minimal and temporary.
Paul also said we can expect better performance tomorrow...
Read Here: http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/p/33174/209125.aspx#209125
196,401 users have contributed to 43,017 threads and 258,409 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 131 new user(s).
Paul says it's not a good idea to pause and restart, as the bump in speed is minimal and temporary.
Paul also said we can expect better performance tomorrow...
Read Here: http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/p/33174/209125.aspx#209125
First of all, congratulations on completing such a huge sample-library (and a nod to Dietz, he knows...). I must however note some disappointments. First of all, why labour so much and for so long for such a small violin ensemble?...
8 violins only!! Balanced with 6 celli and 4 basses?!? I don't know how I would use this. The rest of the strings, fine; but the violins?! I mean why should we need to blend with Orchestrals or Apassionatas? Would it really have been that many more samples and editing had VSL recorded 2-3 more desks? I would be happy to have had at least some generic divisi of a modern philharmonic violin section, and I wouldn't expect to have the complete sul G or E from every violin involved.
I agree with Daryl in that I also would appreciate the option of up/down bowing, but it's mainly the size of the ensemble that bothers me.
Finally, what's wrong with boxed products? Have we become so eco-nuts that we have lost all sense of practicality? I know that it wouldn't be that much more expensive to offer a box-option, and I believe many of us here would rather pay a few extra €/$ than download for hours on end, to say nothing of ensuing problems intrinsic to that method... And not everybody wants to buy the hard disk, although I applaud that idea. Please-please-please-please-please bring back the beautiful DVDs and boxes.
Here's an idea to make the section sound less thin (in theory): use the pitch/transpose trick (as described by Beat on his site) to create another 8 extra violin section. Double those with the existing 8 and you'll have 16 unique players (without phasing problems).
Or: double the 8 strings with the chamber strings. Will give you 6+8= 14 strings 😄 which you still could divide (albeit unevenly) in 2 or 3 divisi.
I wouldn´t do that. Here´s a link that points in the right direction, from our perspective.
Best,
Paul
Paul, I am still confused about your comments. I have been using VI Pro 2.0.10214 just fine in MIR SE. Are you saying that Dimension Strings will NOT work in that particular build of VI Pro?
By the way, I do realize that I could get the free upgrade to MIR 24 from MIR SE, and purchase the latest version of VE. At this time though, if at all possible, I would still rather keep things simple and not be switching back and forth between MIR 24 and MIR SE (when I need the larger number of instances in SE). When I finally do upgrade, I would rather go directly to the full MIR Pro, which I cannot do at this time (hence also my curiousity about how long the "early bird" special for DS will last).
Thanks for the clarification.
Also +1 for the return of boxed products. I much prefer boxed products for the full collections (granted, DS is not yet a completed, full collection).
+1
As I sit here 25 hours in, at 28% downloaded.... Those already gorgeous Vienna Boxed Sets, are looking even more attractive.
The option to download with a boxed set on the way, would be nice in the future.
DG,
At what point were you booted out???
I'm 31 hours in @ 34.3% downloaded. (Fingers crossed)...
To your customer service point, I couldn't imagine being some new guy on ILIO or SweetWater making this my first VSL experience.
@Errikos said:
8 violins only!! Balanced with 6 celli and 4 basses?!? I don't know how I would use this.
Why not blend it with the existing chamber violin ensemble? Sample Libraries in many ways can't possibly function the same way as a real orchestra would. In order to get the right sound, I may combine instruments- where in an actual recording this may not be necessary for the sake of realism. 8 Violins vs 4 basses may seem imbalanced, but these are tools for you to work with and you have complete control over how you mix them. If recording 10 basses acheived the right effect, then no matter how 'improper' it seems, the end result is what matters when it comes to samples. That's an extreme example, but all I'm trying to get at is that despite the numbers, the user remains in control and as long as it sounds real and in good quality, nothing else matters. And do I trust VSL to those considerations? Yup! [:)]
@Errikos said:
8 violins only!! Balanced with 6 celli and 4 basses?!? I don't know how I would use this.
Why not blend it with the existing chamber violin ensemble?
My point was, why do I have to do that? I asked why would it not be possible to record a few more desks, at least with some generic articulations for divisi violins, that would have been enough. Regarding your suggestion, I find that the chamber violins for some reason have a unique chamber sound, and I haven't been ale to successfully blend them in a symphonic setting. To the answer that "with enough EQing, filtering, exciting, whatever, you can make them blend, etc.", I say, why go through all that? Just record a few more desks with legato, detache and marcato, and that's it... Short articulations and the other detailed work that has gone into this would be welcome, but not really as necessary as the standad modern orchestra section...
gotcha! I agree. I would prefer a Violin II dimension section as well. Honestly, I'd prefer a larger ensemble to begin with. But I'm still very pleased that this has been released and I'm buying it in a few weeks nonetheless. :) But I do agree. I don't think it's 'bad product' or anything, but ideally I would prefer not having to take such additional routes to acheive the right result. It should be right to begin with. This allows for the fullest flexibility of the samples.
-Sean
[quote=Errikos]My point was, why do Igotcha! I agree. I would prefer a Violin II dimension section as well. Honestly, I'd prefer a larger ensemble to begin with. But I'm still very pleased that this has been released and I'm buying it in a few weeks nonetheless. 😊 But I do agree. I don't think it's 'bad product' or anything, but ideally I would prefer not having to take such additional routes to acheive the right result. It should be right to begin with. This allows for the fullest flexibility of the samples.
-Sean
"...in the present case, it is just as necessary to renounce a nonexistent freedom and recognize a dependence we do not feel."
Hmm. Well, I finished that book. That Tolstoy could go on. But, now it's time to see how much I've downloaded.
48.4% !? Holy stinking [ trombone blat ] ! It's been about 42 hours.
I need to find another book. Let's see: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...."
Great improvement.
We "Early Adapters" got an email from Mr. Tucmandl. I followed the new directions, and all worked smoothly. Now 7 servers appear, and the average download rate went from about 150 kB/s to 650. A three day ETA shrunk to about six more hours. And that's in the evening of a Friday night in the States when, I'm told, Internet traffic is high (if such things matters).
I've learned over the years to keep momentary frustrations with VSL off of the forum, because they always come through.