From the post I sorta hijacked about 'Appassionata Strings'...
In that topic you said you did most of your presets in VI 'lite'. So when I asked what you found indispensable about VI Pro, vs. VI 'lite', you threw me a curve and wrote that you found MIR to be -the- indispensable tool.
OK, isn't MIR a separate product from VI Pro? Are you saying MIR is more important to you than VI Pro? If so, why? Is it the 'spatial control'? (ie. the ability to move instruments in frontf/behind/left/right)?
Also, my understanding is that MIR is (over-simplification) a reverb/mixer... Can you describe your system a bit? I have shied away from MIR because, I combine a lot of audio with MIDI and I'm already mixing in Cubase. I already find the 'flow' complex enough as it is.. adding another 'mixer' seems more of a pain. IOW: I already have a zillion 'windows' going at any given time which drive me nuts.
Do you use VEP along with a DAW? Or is MIR your 'final stop'? Just trying to get an idea of how all the parts fit together.
I apologise for all the noob questions. If $$$ wasn't a factor, I'd get all this stuff and just play around, but it's a -huge- deal so I gotta be real picky about purchases. And if I had a lot more free time than I do, I'd watch all the videos, and exhaustively work with the demos. But I just don't. I got limited time with the DAW every day and -really- working through these products can burn a whole day when I coulda been composing. So I throw out these questions and hope for kindness from strangers. I do appreciate your detailed and helpful replies!
TIA,
----JC