@Donethur: Don't forget that you're the one that started with the insults when you found there were people here with a different opinion to yours, going on and on about immaturity and arrogance in others, etc. You say that you supposedly studied the masters and have "a very clear picture about what is art for [you]", but you seem unable to give us the first clue about what that picture is. The only thing you can do is throw a couple of tracks at us and, unlike the sophisticate you try to pass yourself as, but as a petulant and uneducated teenager instead, you insist that no matter what anyone says, your tracks are just great (why?) because they just are.... And anyone who says different is just mean, self-important, immature... When you use exclusively social-networks' phraseology to admire them, well that might cut mustard in SMSs to your friends or your blog, but it won't cut it here. And since you are so much more mature as a man and an artist than me at least, why don't you try to pull the glue from my eyes and ears by addressing some of my points from your superior (or just plain different) angle?
But what should I expect from someone whose Confucian wisdom about music is summed up in: "I think the music is something to love, not to hate"... I mean what can one say to that? I feel embarassed not only for myself, but for all those generations of musicians as well: From Willaert, Zarlino, Palestrina, Rameau and their polemics, to Berlioz's and Schumann's, Wagner and Tchaikovsky vs. Brahms, Glazunov vs. Strauss, Stravinsky vs. Schoenberg, the futurists vs. everyone else, Lambert's and Adorno's manifesti, Boulez vs. Puccini... All this bad blood and no one there to tell them "I think the music is something to love, not to hate", and humiliate them into silence... Make them shake hands...
But as civilization 3 - your equal in maturity, taste, and intellectual rigour - would say: All aforementioned were ignorant, untalented (yes, she has said that), and now dead white males, not a century too soon...
