Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

191,216 users have contributed to 42,789 threads and 257,329 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 8 new post(s) and 42 new user(s).

  • You are correct about their license and marketing.

    The reason why I think this is worth discussing though, is that there are many things VSL users may desire from VSL's future products. VSL's legato interim patches are limited by 1. Why not more? I have had instances where I hear a subtle machine gun effect because of quickly going back over the same notes, or a kind of fanfaring c g, c g. There are small things that matter. I don't know that Spitfire is any different. But I do know that I liked the trumpet release samples and other things I wish I either had with VSL, or at least had the option of choosing with VSL.

    -Sean


  • last edited
    last edited

    @noldar12 said:

    From information in other forums, if I understand things correctly (I could be wrong), first, there are a very limited number of licenses for Spitfire, and when they are gone, they are gone, and second, one of the requirements for purchasing the libraries is that you will not use them in commercial releases, but only for mock-ups. 

     

    Hmmm. I don't know, if I'm going to drop 19 grand on a sample library I think I have the right to use them however I darn well please.  I can't stand arrogance in any company let alone a sample library.  What reason do they have to limit the use of their product to mock ups.  I wonder how their customer support is.   

    That aside, as much as I adore VSL I think a composer should have other options on hand.  If you use VSL all the time in every project you ever work on your music will develope a homogenous sound to it.  It's like hiring the same trumpet player over and over on all of your projects.  You may really like that trumpet player but it's nice to have some variety every once in a while.  I've been crossing over into other genres of music and I'm finding that VSL can be a bit difficult to work with when you're trying to do a string arrangement for a Pop song or Hard Rock.  Of course, it could be that I need to remove myself from the Classical mentality when composing.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    That aside, as much as I adore VSL I think a composer should have other options on hand.

    I've seen a lot of down-talk from VSL users (not so much here, but elsewhere) on Spitfire's modules. Personally, I've liked very little out of East West and I see many users on here owning VSL and EW, praising both. But I think Spitfire is far better than EW, imo and that their libraries have advantages and disadvantages and in every way they are just as viable as VSL on several different things. I think Spitfire is producing very high quality instruments.

    I like how much Albion comes with out-of-box. For the price, I think they offer a great bundle. It's certainly restrictive in it's limitations, but for producing fast and usable results and for adding to what I already own with VSL... it is a very useful offering. I plan to get it fairly soon. I've been having a very hard time deciding on whether I want to purchase VE Pro, Albion, or Spitfire percussion right now.

    -Sean


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    That aside, as much as I adore VSL I think a composer should have other options on hand.  If you use VSL all the time in every project you ever work on your music will develope a homogenous sound to it.  It's like hiring the same trumpet player over and over on all of your projects.  You may really like that trumpet player but it's nice to have some variety every once in a while.  I've been crossing over into other genres of music and I'm finding that VSL can be a bit difficult to work with when you're trying to do a string arrangement for a Pop song or Hard Rock.  Of course, it could be that I need to remove myself from the Classical mentality when composing.

     

    There is some truth to his, in the same way that if you hire the LSO for all your performances, they will all sound like the LSO. However, I don't really see that as a deep-seated problem.

    DG


  •  I agree with your observation of Spitfire's demo. Spitfire's sound far superior in a sense the whole orchestra sounds blended very well, not only the woodwinds. The sound it's very close to the Hollywood Orchestra sound. Although some users might not like the wet sound (it seems it comes default that way) I don't mind. It's too pricey...


  • Did I have a post deleted on this thread or did it just not get posted for whatever reason?  Weird.


  • I own Spitfire Albion as well as their Harp and I do love the organic sound of their library.  That said, VSL always finds a place in my music.  I find it still to be the best as far as over all quality, flexbility and sound.  No other library as a whole matches the legatos from VSL.  I don't regret buying any of the various products I've purchased from them over the years.  Albion blends quite beautifully with VSL IMO.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Fiery Angel said:

    Albion blends quite beautifully with VSL IMO.

    Thank you!! I've been wanting feedback on that. Good to hear! VSL and Spitfire are the only two orchestral companies to ever impress me sound-wise so I eventually plan to own Spitfire's Albion and percussion libraries soon enough. But I have limited myself entirely to wait until VE5 cause I can't make up my mind on anything lately. [*-)]

    -Sean


  • last edited
    last edited

    @mike connelly said:

    Did I have a post deleted on this thread or did it just not get posted for whatever reason?  Weird.

    Something must have gone wrong while your message was sent to the server. If a message gets deleted on purpose, the forum's engine would inform you with a mail to your user account.

    Kind regards,


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • There is no question that VSL samples are top. But I do believe it has some issues in the final mix when VSL is used as a stand alone orchestra. My observation doesn't deal with the quality of the samples but the spacing of the orchestral sound. I may suggest VSL to use more omni microphones when recording intead of cardiod. There is this one little upgrade fix that VSL need to do and they are undisputable number one

      


  • Hi- I'm a newbie to this forum so please forgive any mistakes of protocol. I am finally updating my sample library (I still use miroslav, Garritan 1st edition and QL Brass 1st edition) and am wondering what people think I should get? I have Kontakt 4 which came with some VSL solo instruments which I like, though I think the instruments are fairly limited editions. The spitfire stuff sounds great as well, though I'm confused by their "water marking." Money, as always, is an issue, but if I'm investing in this, I rather spend my money on what will work. thx!

  • I love Spitfire.  Some seriously killer sounding stuff.  I love VSL as well, breathtaking the scope of all their products both software and samples. EastWest however, are the worse company on earth; I will never buy another EW product period.


  • dsilvercoin,

    First, sorry pal but this is a long reply from a long winded guy. Second, I've replied assuming you're going to use this for film or t.v. scoring scenarios, whether mockup or production use.

    Long term investment and believability (realism in sound) are always the most important traits to any library for me. VSL and Spitfire are the ONLY two libraries that have ever lived up to my standards for realism. With that in mind, one cannot ignore that Spitfire has a highly restrictive license and libraries. The expensive stuff requires that you regularly hire performers (which my being in the 'I'm pursuing a career' stage in my life, does not function within their policy). The affordible stuff has a good sound, but 1) It's nothing I can't obtain from VSL. It's just a good 'out of the box' sound, meaning less tweaking required. Also, 2) that 'less tweaking' point is paramount to me. The lower cost libraries offer no flexibility and very limited articulations. One can only make something sound believable with such limitations.

    Another point is software. Spitfire has no desire to persue software development. While I used to love Kontakt (and still find occasional uses for it), Vienna Instruments Pro 1.0 blew Kontakt out of the water. It truly was a night and day difference for my productivity and ease of use. Yes, there was a learning curve. To get my samples sounding how I want, I had to put forth a bit of hard work and effort. But now that I do, my only owning the Special Edition, SE Strings Plus, Fanfare Trumpets, and Epic Horns dwarf any other library's ability to sound real. VI Pro 2.0 is now out and it is even more phenominal. The enveloped time stretching has given me tremolo and trill possibilities previously unavailable. I now have performances that no other library can even acheive.

    By all means, Spitfire is good. If you want quick and easy and one style only, I'd say go for it. But if you want to actually write anything according to your composing choices, style, and so on- AND if you want to write for multiple styles of music... I'd say VSL is the far more logical choice. In the end all of those points boil down to investment to me. My priority is VSL. Why? Because I can do anything with it and sound better than any other library available. Because I am not limited by wet samples. Because their software allows for far more productive approaches than Kontakt could ever dream.

    In the end, it's better to own both, everything even. It's even better to record real performances. But for the time and money, it's VSL. For the flexibility and quality of sound, it's VSL. I may sound a bit too VSL fanboy-ish but it is only because of my good experience. I could care less about asthetics and simpleton way that some companies approach things. I care about function above all else. VSL functions best imo. So the cost is far more justified.

    Hopefully that helps,

    -Sean

    P.S. I had a friend explain how much he loved Hollywood Strings. I explained that 'There is no such thing as a Hollywood Cello'. What one needs in the industry is not the same sound that everyone else is producing. No one wants that. What they want is the ability to do that sound, other sounds, richer, darker, louder, and every other kind of sound one can imagine. When in film scores I hear dry, wet, and every other combination of everything out there... I can't help but remember that VSL is dry, and no one else really is. I can do both, they can't. That may seem like a simple answer, but in the end... what is more effective and what is going to give you the flexibility you need to produce anything asked of you?


  • That's a good post.  VSL has a depth of sound that has a truly lasting value since its based on great musical quality.   Even the old First Edition instruments are still used all the time.  But another part of this last post that is very true is the software aspect.  I also use Kontakt, EW, Play, used to do Gigastudio, etc.  But as soon as Vienna Ensemble/Instruments came out I completely adapted to it and now all the other systems are so clumsy in comparison I don't want to bother with them unless I have to - which is basically never.  There is an elegant quality to the VSL software that is perfect for selecting and using samples in any way you can dream of. 

    ... a Hollywood cello!  I love it.    Now what I really need is a Hollywood Tuba.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    Now what I really need is a Hollywood Tuba.

    And the Hollywood Piccolo! Over 20GB of pure piccolo delight! Each articulation played specifically with film in mind! lol, wow...


  • More cowbell, anybody ...?

    *duck and run*


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  •  dsilvercoin,

    Spitfire has some great stuffs, but the low budget line they offer to the general audience comes not even close to what VSL offers. Spitfire's top line is probably the best out there but 18k for a bundle of strings... too pricey... add the ridiculous restriction rules on top of that.

    People are fed up with EastWest company for many different reasons but I advise you to check out their latest products, Hollywood Strings and Hollywood Brass. They are of a different level, nothing like the old EastWest products.

    VSL still offers the widest range of instruments

    regards


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Dietz said:

    More cowbell, anybody ...?

    lol, what's sad is that if VSL produced an alpen horn, you bet I'd buy it!

    1) Because I've actually played one in Switzerland (not that this really justifies anything)

    2) Because I'm fairly sure the original William Tell Overature actually have an Alpen horn in it. If Rossini can do it, so can I!!

    Now I better scedaddle also before VSL deletes my account for getting even more dull on here [|-)] 


  • I own all the Spitfire "Commercial Line" (low priced) libraries. They're very nice, and I expect to get a lot of use out of them. They have a unique sound. That said, they do not approach my VSL libraries in terms of number of articulations, number of dynamic ranges, or fit and finish (not to say that looser performances don't sometimes have a certain charm, but you really want a perfect performance in your toolk kit first). VSL is far ahead in this department.

    I see things like Spitfire's Albion, Solo Strings, Harp and Percussion as things that one would add for more variety after you already had the VSL libraries (and in fact, they say that themselves). Otherwise, you're going to come up short when you need articulations that the Spitfire commercial line libraries just don't have.

    I'd be interested to see what those really expensive Spitfire libraries are like, but I can't justify the price tag. I'd be pretty sure, though, that more care and effort has gone into VSL (and EW) products, just because of the economy of scale.


  • Thank you all for your excellent replies. Yes, I will use this for film and TV scoring. Forgive the two, somewhat off topic follow up questions, but: 1) Is it safe to assume there a VSL bias in the VSL forum, or is it as good as everyone is saying. I stumbled upon another post in another post where a user recommended Strings - LASS, Cinematic String, EWQL Hollywood Strings Brass - Cinebrass/Cinebrass Pro, Hollywood Brass Woodwinds - VSL, Westgate , WIVI 2) How do people recommend buying into VSL. I own a lot of earlier enervation libraries and a knowledgable SL person thought that while the Vienna Special Edition (the recommended usual introduction to VSL) would be better than what I have, it wouldn't be THAT much better to justify the purchase. He felt I'd have better luck buying the DVDs or some DVD package. The thought of buying one DVD at a time over a few years and getting burned on the price disadvantage is not too appealing. I've seen the cube (standard) for $3199 and wonder if it makes sense toy buy that and then to buy the extended library licenses as I need them. Perhaps others have better ideas? Again thank you all and any further advice would be greatly appreciated.