I believe I should be able to load more into a 64bit Windows 7 system with 24 GB Ram.
What Windows Resource Monitor reports however (and I'm looking at processes from ALL users) is that I'm at 98% of all physical RAM when my sample load is just 10GB.
Okay I haven't added up all the other processes - but it's pretty clear that they aren't going to add up to 12GB - not anywhere near.
Before loading samples, the system is using about 2 GB of RAM.
Now I've observed this on 2 different systems, using different software and instances. The really odd thing, is that if I close and then reload again, the system reports the same 10GB, but now only 49% of physical memory being used.
e.g. VEP on a Slave - running single instance of this - with multiple Play 3 instances. Another, just using Cubase 6 and loading separate VST instances of Play 3.
Looks to me that either Windows has a problem reporting RAM use - or some doubling behind the scenes is going on here - or there is some confusion with something somewhere.
Before you blast me from this forum - might I suggest that this issue began to occur only after installing VEP on both machines? I can't be sure. But what is clear is that this is only an issue for Windows in the running of Play 3, or VEP, or Cubase.
But how can Windows 7 possible report usage of RAM to be 98% when if you add up what Windows also reports as the individual RAM use of each process, it comes to half the value?
So it is either a fully Microsoft problem (seems unlikely that us musicians are the only people who like to use a lot of RAM) - or it is something in the music software that is messing with the OS somehow.
P6X58D-E - 3Ghz Quad Core - 24 gB RAM - Windows Professional 64-bit - VEP Pro - Play 3.0.21
P8P67 Pro - 3.4 Ghz Quad Core - 16 gB Ram - Windows Professional 64-bit - Cubase 6.02 - Play 3.0.21