Hi Dietz, my bad explanation. Yes we can load the IR's one at a time and that's at least possible.

But we can only SEE one IR at a time and I have thousands to choose from. We can only scroll through one at a time without seeing what is next. You would have to agree that this is a limited functionality for those of us with a small fortune invested in 3rd party IR's.

If you could see the TL Space displays folders of IR's you would see what I mean.

I use Altiverb and TL Space and TL is the best system for displaying and choosing IR's.

Your Convo Reverb has a functional interface but needs a better way of displaying what we have been accustomed to for years now.

IR's should appear in the hierarchy that they are stored in and in manufacturer headings. In other words they should be set out as your "Factory" menu is..................except your Factory menu is almost empty. We have thousands of IR's to fill it!!

By the way I think your eq interface is the best I've ever used.

Here is a picture of the TL Space Browser with a small selection of IR's

http://www.philbuckle.com/filechute/TL%20Space%20Browser.pdf

I get your point, thanks.

@philco said:

[...] except your Factory menu is almost empty. We have thousands of IR's to fill it!!

Hey, so do we! 😉

-> [URL]http://vsl.co.at/en/211/497/1686/313/1388.htm[/URL]

-> [URL]http://vsl.co.at/en/211/497/1686/311/181.htm[/URL]

-> [URL]http://vsl.co.at/en/211/497/1686/312/242.htm[/URL]

All of them will appear in the Preset Menu.

Kind regards,

Yes they look good but please excuse us pop/rock guys because our eyes will glaze over when we see yet another concert hall reverb that we will never use. Believe me I have all the Altiverb concert hall IR's from every exotic country on the planet............and I haven't used one of them except to make sure that it didn't work in my track.

Selfish I know but it's more important to be able to get to our Acoustics IR's of the EMT 252 and the Lexicons and all the other goodies.

Still I can understand that you would want to keep things proprietary with your plugs.........but look at it this way.........you won't be LOSING any sales by opening things up a bit[:D]

@philco said:

 Still I can understand that you would want to keep things proprietary with your plugs.........but look at it this way.........you won't be LOSING any sales by opening things up a bit

Sorry if I seem to be dense ... what exactly do you mean by "opening things up"?

Oh simply allowing a more user friendly navigation of 3rd party IR's. Nothing more than that.

I know that a lot of NON orchestral guys (from ProTools world) are looking at VEPro to run their VI's (because they don't work very well in PT) and they already have all their IR's from other plugs. Being able to navigate them properly (as in more elegantly than the current Vienna Suite Convo Rev system) would tempt them to invest in Vienna Suite.

No  disrespect  intended. Just wondered if you were aware of the migration of PT users to VEP and what their plug needs would be.

@philco said:

I know that a lot of NON orchestral guys (from ProTools world) are looking at VEPro to run their VI's (because they don't work very well in PT) and they already have all their IR's from other plugs. Being able to navigate them properly

All the enginners  i know  using ProTools, are more than happy with VI. I don't understand that point. No probs at all.

And how you select IR's - who cares. UI is my very last concern on this world rather than sound engineering.

@philco said:

Oh simply allowing a more user friendly navigation of 3rd party IR's. Nothing more than that.

Oh, ok - the navigation! I thought you meant the import of IRs.

You have my vote on this. 😊

@philco said:

I know that a lot of NON orchestral guys (from ProTools world) are looking at VEPro to run their VI's (because they don't work very well in PT) and they already have all their IR's from other plugs. Being able to navigate them properly

All the enginners  i know  using ProTools, are more than happy with VI. I don't understand that point. No probs at all.

And how you select IR's - who cares. UI is my very last concern on this world rather than sound engineering.

There are a lot of composers using PT 8 HD these days..........not only engineers. Avid have tried to capture some of the Logic market by improving the midi spec of PT 8 and as a result there are a lot of composers trying to use multiple VI's and other RTAS plugs along with the regular TDM plugs. There are many problems with this setup and they are well documented on the DUC (Digi User Conference)

I have been using ProTools since it's inception way back in the 90's. Never has there been more dissatisfaction than right now. Some would say that Avid are in serious trouble. I wouldn't know about that but I can tell you that trying to use multiple VI's in PT8 is some kind of living hell.

This is why the composers who still want to use PT for it's incredible audio handling (me included) are now starting to use VEPro on slave machines. It's working great and we can let ProTools just handle audio and it behaves just like it used to.

Because we've been using PT for so long we have quite a collection of IR's and I was merely pointing out that it would be nice to be able to navigate in a more elegant fashion using the Vienna Suite Convo verb. That's all.

PToolsHD still works well. I use it every day. Just not with too many VI's.

Go over to the DUC and check out the mayhem in regard to this. There are many unhappy users.

@philco said:

Oh simply allowing a more user friendly navigation of 3rd party IR's. Nothing more than that.

Oh, ok - the navigation! I thought you meant the import of IRs.

You have my vote on this. 😊

Cool!![Y]