Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

193,985 users have contributed to 42,905 threads and 257,892 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 17 new post(s) and 88 new user(s).

  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Vienna Instruments Pro
  4. VEPro WISH LIST
  • I
    I

    How about the ability to Couple or Decouple all instances of VEP at once?
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC

    - Can you give the possibility not to see the left part of the VE Pro, it should save some process time as you will not have to display each tracks twice (once horizontally one vertically )

    - Can we have a voice message or a sound when the Ensemble has finish to be loaded

    - Use Names of the output and inputs defined in MAC OS X by the audio driver

    Thanks in advance

    Cyril
  • I
    I

    An option to load up a Metaframe with the VEP instances hidden (as opposed to having each instance open up and needing to minimize/close them one at a time).
  • K
    K
    last edited
    last edited

    @igor said:

    An option to load up a Metaframe with the VEP instances hidden (as opposed to having each instance open up and needing to minimize/close them one at a time).

    You'll be glad to hear that this is a feature in the upcoming update.
  • P
    P

    "...(as opposed to having each instance open up and needing to minimize/close them one at a time)."

    CAUTION: do this carefully. 

    On a Mac, if you OPTION click the red button at the top left of any VE Pro Instance window, they will all close in sequence. Nothing unloads. It just closes the windows.

    BUT the final window will be the server. Do NOT close that, as the whole program will unload. You get a confirmation dialogue, and "No" (don't close) is the default option. 

    Yeah, even since that MIDI bridge for Giga years ago, VSL products have asked if we want to save when nothing was done. I know you're erring on the side of caution, but I could do without this. 
  • K
    K
    It doesn't have anything to do with caution actually. It is a matter of detecting changes in the project, which causes a noticeable overhead.
  • P
    P
    last edited
    last edited

    @philco said:

    • Ability to name outputs. (instead of Net 1+2 etc)

    Mhhh don´t know where the problem is there i can name the outputs like i want. It´s really easy.The outbuts are the buses and that can be easly edited😊
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC
    last edited
    last edited

    @philco said:

    • Ability to name outputs. (instead of Net 1+2 etc)

    Mhhh don´t know where the problem is there i can name the outputs like i want. It´s really easy.The outbuts are the buses and that can be easly edited😊

    It will be better that VSL uses the names of the input and the output defined in the Audio driver like does most audio software under MAC OS X

    Input "Guitare"  input "Violin I" will have the same names in all audio softwares

    Why make it complicated when it can be simple 😉

    Best

    Cyril
  • P
    P

    Yes we know how to rename the Bus of course. We want to be able to rename Net 1+2 etc to something meaningful. If you know how to do that then please tell.

    Another feature that would help would be if VEP put an asterisk or some changed font for the outputs that have been used already in the current Metaframe.

    I'm constantly scanning my outputs to see what has and hasn't been used. In Protools the outputs become italic if they have been used.

    This would be handy.......no?
  • Cyril BlancC
    Cyril BlancC
    last edited
    last edited

    @philco said:

    I'm constantly scanning my outputs to see what has and hasn't been used. In Protools the outputs become italic if they have been used.

    This would be handy.......no?

    same with Logic but in bold