Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

182,995 users have contributed to 42,272 threads and 254,969 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 45 new user(s).

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Arnold Veeman said:

    some of them even get cracked VI software by WWW peer to peer

    well, it is commonly known that certain people confuse free (available) like for open source with free (without charge) like with free beer or free lunch ... but just to have that said: there is no cracked VI (like Vienna Instruments) out there, though there is cracked VI (like Virtual Instruments software from whomever) available through specific channels ...

    everybody has to decide themselves what to install at all risk of finally finding uninvited guests on the system ...

    christian


    and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.
  • last edited
    last edited

    @Arnold Veeman said:

    Thank you for your great effort to put this together! It's a joy to hear, in particular the parts where most live performances lack on clarity and disbalance (also due to some spaces where the performance/recording is)

    But! Talking about Straviski... A year ago I stumbled upon a piece of software that could do this for a fraction of the VI price. One small part of Strawinski's Rite of Spring was used to showcase some of the posibilities. Here is a link: http://www.synful.com/Sounds/Synful_Plays_Rite_of_Spring.mp3. Beware, it sounds very cool...

    I downloaded the demo and although there was a little tweaking needed to enhance the sound a little (they are currently recording better sounds, but I haven't tried the new demo yet) the results were alarming 😉 "Pricewise" I mean! Approx. 1 tenth of the cost of VI with such results...

    Don't get me wrong, I a big fan of your software! It is still the best available. I spread the word on a daily basis 😉 And I'm even planning to buy VI this year (I still have the old version...), but I just wanted to point you to the price versus quality thing, I mentioned before. A pain, really... All the students I teach try, AND some of them even get cracked VI software by WWW peer to peer! For free, but at high risks of course! They all want to have it, that for sure and they know (and not only my students, but really a lot of others too, as you might figure) it is very useful, especially for learning orchestration and such. I mean isn't there a way to get student prices or get this (once again) great software cheaper on the market? It's you or them, I know, but both of you guys miss opportunities here!

    In short: Great demo! But I mean different manufacturers are turning over...

    First off - As I mentioned on another forum - Jay this is nothing short of brilliant.  WELL DONE.

    In regards to Synful -  the 'sound' (final product) is not even close to the sound quality of Jay's mock up (in terms of performance and final end produced music) - IMHO.  Don't get me wrong - I continue to watch their efforts VERY closely.

    Now, having said that - my hope is that VSl continues to explore software/sample improvements to allow us 'working stiffs' to emulate even something approaching Jay's wonderful mock-up with much less time required.

    Most of the indie films I am involved in allow for 5-7 weeks (for 60-80 mins of music) - writing, orchestration, mixing, etc....  On most projects - I have to hit 2-3 mins/day.   I find myself continually making 'compromises' only becuase there is a limited amount of time.

    With VE3 - I get a ton more donein the same amount of time - from just a few years ago - but of course I look forward to what the future holds for new VSL developments.

    Rob


  • Fantastic stuff Jay!

    I can't believe it's not butter (the Brits might be the only ones that "get" this reference - needless to say it sounds remarkably like the real thing)...

    M


  •  I can't believe it's not butter?  What are you talking about?  That is the most common margarine in America.   I regularly say at the dinner table "Pass the I Can't Believe."

    However you are  right, it is hard to believe this is actually margarine.


  •  Truly remarkable, Jay. Though..... it's not nice to fool Mother Nature [:D]

    Mahlon


  • Congratulations Jay!  A truely remarkable achievement, and I can't think of a better sample library than VSL to give you the right tools to do it! [H]  You're the man Jay!


  •  Extraordinary and wonderful. Congratulations both Jay and the VSL team.

    Jay can you clarify how you got all th notes in was it a mix of playing and notation.?

     Have you thought whether using a notation programme like Sibelius would improve your workflow? I wonder whether such complex scores could be scanned into Sibelius a lot quicker and easier.

    If you ever re-mix this can you bring the tubas up significantly just to please me.


  • I noticed that Jay has not responded to anyones questions yet...he must be drunk, hibernating or on a well deserved vacation...maybe all 3! LOL!

    Anyway, this is truly a landmark achievement and the apex in the history of MIDI orchestration (IMHO). The Le Sacre MIDI file has been available on the net for some time but shaping and contouring it into a "performance" is really the hard part.

    I think this piece could only have been done with VSL products (and of course Jays master craftsmanship didn't hurt either :-) , the others just don't have enough articulations to achieve this level of realism for the orchestrational devices Igor used in it's composition. It requires all the "optional" articulations like the fA and Harsh, Rep, and Rep-Legato, ponticello, harmonics...The key to achieving such quality is to start with the best articulations for each note/phrase, shaping Vel and dynamics will definitely help but they can't be substituted for the wrong/inadequate/unavailable articulations.

    One more device that, I think, allowed for such an accurate reproduction of such a difficult piece was the VI itself. It's architecture and design were probably extremely helpful in realizing this complex work of art. Can you imagine how many tracks Jay would have needed doing it the "old" way? (with each articulation on its own track). Probably 10 times the amount he used!

    Thanks to VSL for creating such a work of art in its own right! And Jay, with your skill and talent, you've shown us all (yet again) the potential we each have every time we sit down and use the VI. I am inspired and have new found energy to persevere and overcome the daily grind of life in-order to achieve something even half as good as this mock-up!

    Regards,

    DM33


  •  Yes, the number of tracks required from older systems is horrible, compared to VE.  For example, Gigastudio required you to do each separate articulation on a separate track if it was complex music.   So that was a nightmare I personally dealt with.   With Vienna Ensemble, a huge step forward in being able to realize complex music was accomplished.  Though also it is the number, and the skill in selecting, the samples required for really musical needs that VSL did, which makes this possible in the hands of a sufficiently good musician (which Jay obviously is).  

    And BTW I don't think Jay is drunk now. I think he is ritually slaughtering virgins on the street outside his house, while doing oddly irregular dance steps. 


  • last edited
    last edited

    Thank you everyone for the very warm response.   And a special thanks to Herb, Michael, Dietz and team VSL for creating such an amazing musical "instrument!"

    @Another User said:

    And BTW I don't think Jay is drunk now. I think he is ritually slaughtering virgins on the street outside his house, while doing oddly irregular dance steps.

    Bill, I'm afraid my neighborhood is fresh out of virgins at the moment but oldly irregular dance steps pretty accurately describes my dancing abilities.

    Cheers,

    Jay


  • Jay, I'm speechless.   You'll go down in history as one of finest virtuousos of the digital orchestra.  Thanks for the gift and the inspiration!

    - Paul


  • I think if Stravinski could of been around to hear this, he would of been very impressed and proud.


  •  There are scanning programs but as with OCR of any kind they cause so many editing problems it seems easier to just put the notes in with a sequencer or notation program manually.  Though maybe that has changed.

    That is interesting to hear about how wide a spread of distance in the reverb was used in this. 

    Was that the 8-velocity tam-tam?  That seems to respond best to muted choke effects by using CC11.  I wish a few more tamtam articulations would be recorded for those particular gongs, similar to the suspended cymbal in rolls - short and long crescendos, and choked.  There is a lot of short ff tam-tam strokes in that score, isn't there?  Those are very hard to play live.

    I wondered about the same sort of thing Guy  mentioned -  what would Stravinsky think?   If he wasn't biased against modern elements such as the technological approach,  he probably would like this as it is very faithful to the score.  I have around 20 recordings on CD and LP, including two different ones conducted by Stravinsky, and this recording though digitally created is not a mere stunt, but quite musically valid right alongside those.  It is interesting  to hear how various elements of the score - which is blisteringly difficult for a live orchestra to play -  are actually clearer in this MIDI performance.  And of course, the famously difficult changing irregular meters, so easy to screw up sitting in an orchestra (or waving one's hands in front of an orchestra) are absolutely perfect in MIDI.  That also makes me think Stravinsky would like it - the accuracy of rhythm possible this way.


  •  Jay, here,s Photoscore http://www.neuratron.com/photoscore.htm 

    I think with printed scores it is meant to do a good job but the more complex the score the more tidying up there will be. Worth a look. And I would bet my bottom dollar that someone somewhere on the web has already created a score of the rite and any other major work either in sibelius or finale.


  • Thanks for the info Dave.   I'm downloading the demo right now.   If this works it will be a real time saver!

    Best,

    Jay


  •  Looks like it works quite well.   I owe you a beer Dave (and some louder tubas!).

    --Jay


  •  That's good news Jay.


  •  I think I'm going to try this on my own music - an old score printed in Music Printer Plus.


  • What about the Alpensinfonie, Jay?

    [;)]

    Congrats, sincerely.


  • Yes, I was wondering - what could someone do that could outdo this?  And of course the Alpensinfonie came to mind. However, since programming it would result complete homicidal madness, I don't advise anyone to take that step.   Purely on altruistic grounds.

    Jay, don't even think about it.  You need rest now.  No more MIDI for you.  At least for a good long period of recuperation.  Or the men in white coats will soon be calling.  Trust me on this.