oh, a new library ? Imagine that...
-
I for one would be extremely grateful for a SE Plus Plus or other package of "modern" articulations. Since on many occasions it is not the complete accuracy of pitch that counts it won't be a monumental undertaking (although I take it the company has only held orchestral recordings once in 2004 no matter how many products it keeps offering - I could be wrong); I also am aware of the multitudinous technical issues involved (ex. which multiphonics will be available depends on instruments and players etc.) and that some effects are more "effective" in solo or chamber than orchestral settings; whatever the case and issues involved, I would certainly be prepared to buy stereometrically should something like this materialize with the usual meticulousness and comprehensiveness we have come to expect from VSL.
-
"Are there any plans for sampling more "contemporary" techniques?" I would also like to know. Now seems like a good time to plan on a "Vienna Instruments Contemporary Edition". Xsample has proven that there is a high demand for extended techniques. I hope VSL look to composers such as Toshio Hosokawa(Japan's most important living composer)& others for what can be done musically with these techniques. Dom
-
Albert S
This new xsample libary looks like a tweaking/reprogramming of many of their old samples - which included many of these particular instruments such as bass flute, basset horn and oboe d'amore - with some new ones. I have the entire old one and these new instruments suspiciously feature the same articulations and is about the same size.
Though they have a few new instruments, such as toy piano. hey! VSL needs to do a 12-velocity full-modeled toy piano. Enough of this Appassionata Strings stuff. I need a proper toy piano to go with the tam-tam ensemble on my new concerto in 12 movements.
-
No need for irony William, we are all different composers with different needs.
I work with Finale every day. My main concern is to have decent playback of my scores when I'm working on a new piece. Having a large palette of available techniques is a big plus for me.
I do hope that Vienna would consider sampling some more "obscure" playing techniques. Why not as separate download instruments?
-
I got the Ircam library. As I wrote in Northernsounds it's a nice palette, and even the mainstream composer can succesfully blend it with any existing library and/or virtual instrument, VSL included, whenever he or she needs some dirty, grotesque, sarcastic, unusual or rough "contemporary" mood: with the Ircam lib you get tons of really uncommon and flawlessly recorded sounds, their demos give an exact idea of how it sounds right out-of-the-box and the library has nothing to do with VSL or EW. At the present time, it's not a VSL competitor: it's a (serious) contemporary solo instruments library, not an orchestral-FX one. Their UVI player works, but, to be honest, it's not exactly a state-of-the-art piece of software. I guess (and hope) it will be improved... :-)
-
Actually, I think the IRCAM library is really exciting! Not to be used on its own, I don't think, but to fill out the missing articulations in the VSL stuff it's brilliant. I've been popping in requests for these techniques to VSL for years... I wonder if we will see them at some stage?
J.
-
At first I was disappointed, but I've been searching the internet and found a preset list for the IRCAM Solo Instruments. They've sampled a lot of extended techniques, many more than XSample Chamber Ensemble and they sound better too. They even have transition samples, like playing a sustained note that moves from sul pont. to ord. etc. I agree that when it comes to ordinary performance techniques VSL is far superior, but for extended techniques I've never seen a library like this and it's not that expensive, almost half the price of XSample. My only concern with using it is getting it to blend seamlessly with the VSL samples.
http://www.ultimatesoundbank.com/uviscp1.html?doc=overview
Brian
-
Yes, I totally agree on all points. But they sound to me as though they've been recorded in a very dry environment, so combining them may not be too bad, particularly since the IRCAM stuff would probably be used only for the extended techniques (and the transitions!), and thus would be expected to sound different, to an extent. I'm about 95% sold on this set, as I think it would be a great addition to my composing set-up. I used to make more use of extended techniques in my concert music, before I started using VSL regularly -- this is basically a coincidence, btw; I wrote primarily on paper before I started using VSL -- and I've often felt concerned about these colours sort of disappearing from my vocabulary. So just having access to these techniques in my composition rig would be a real benefit, I think. The only thing that's sort of holding me back is that I already feel burdened down by the job of selecting articulations... I know VSL has made a best-possible solution for this with the VIs, but it's still a chore, and adding more fuel to the articulation-selection fire may just push me over the edge!
J.
-
Can anyone say, when working with Sibelius, if the UVI workstation will work alongside VI?
In Finale 2009 (Mac version) it does: one has to assign, say, Vienna Ensemble to channels 1-16 and UVI to channels 17-32 from the "Audio Units Instruments" menu. I suppose it should work the same way in Sibelius...
-
Can anyone say, when working with Sibelius, if the UVI workstation will work alongside VI?
In Finale 2009 (Mac version) it does: one has to assign, say, Vienna Ensemble to channels 1-16 and UVI to channels 17-32 from the "Audio Units Instruments" menu. I suppose it should work the same way in Sibelius... Thanks so much for the quick response. I printed out the Urcam reference manual today, and it's pretty much what I been asking from VSL, right down to the notation supplement - I wish they had included the fingerings for the multiphonics they sampled. Anyway, this is great news!
-
I have a large library of multiphonics of the bassoon, oboe, cor anglais, oboe d'amore and soprano saxophone. None of spectral components of any of those multiphonics fall together with the equal temperament, not even the fundamental tones. I have a spectral plot, a fingering chart, and the microtonal notation with quarter-tone accidentals for each sample. Without adjusting the pitch of the other instruments in some ways, but not necessarelly an exact tuning of the harmonic components of the standard tuning (non-multiphonic) instrument to a multiphonic, it sounds like in a cat valley.
When you compose with multiphonic, you have no control over that each player creates a slightly other spectrum, in other words, when you carefully adjust, and notate the harmonic context of the standard tuning instrument to the multiphonic, e.g. the string chorus, it will sound different from each oboist when played live. I guess that is the one reason why pieces with multiphonics are often solo pieces, or instrumented in ways where this detriment does not matter. Of course you can always ignore that, and accept how it sounds, or simply use the multiphonic samples to which you adjusted the harmonic context.
-
huh? I'm really not sure what you're trying to say... But I hope you're not trying to suggest that sampling extended techniques isn't useful. I mean, because they're so hit-and-miss with different performers and different instruments, I'd be reluctant to use sampled multiphonics at all while composing a new piece - unless I'd actually heard my intended performers playing the precise ones I had in my sample library, of course. But there are so many other great, expressive, and useful techniques out there that VSL hasn't yet sampled...
Anyway, I certainly do wish VSL would release a "21st Century Vienna" collection. That would put an end to any anxiety I have about choosing between xSample and IRCAM (not a choice I really want to make - though lack of brass is a serious vote against xsample). A VSL collection of similar techniques would be bliss... C'mon guys, anything in the works? ;-)
(A totally useless question, I know, since VSL never talks about sample libraries before they're released... But it would be great to know whether I should hold onto my dough for a few more days, weeks, months...)
J.
-
jbm
if you like, pm me your email adress, and i upload you some samples of the extended techniques including the notation - it's always good, and sometimes dispiriting, to experience how it is composing with samples of extended techniques
-
Well, thanks for the offer, but unless they're pre-programmed in exs format, or something simple, I really can't spend the time integrating them into my system right now. I've used extended techniques of various kinds in the past in my concert music, and never felt dispirited... But I guess you just mean dispirited by working with the samples, not the final performed result? Anyway, the use of extended techniques for widening my timbral palette has sort of slipped away since I started using VSL to actually compose. It's not that big a deal, because I've replaced those colours with other colours derived more directly from the orchestration (or I just write in the technique and enjoy it at the premiere!), but it would be nice to have the options in my working set-up.
The site is giving me some crazy error page when I try to pm you, but I'll try again later. If you do have them programmed into some common format then I would love to give them a try.
thanks,
J.
-
My impression is that the VSL user base could be divided into two categories:
1. Composers who write for "media", ie film, commercials, computer games etc. The quality of the sound library is of course crucial for this category, since these sounds will be part of the final composition. It seems that most of these composers work and compose primarily with a DAW. I guess that a realistic orchestral sound will always be more important to this category than multiphonics, scratch tone, toy pianos etc.
2. Composers who write "concert music", ie for musicians, singers, choirs, orchestras etc. Composing this type of music is usually done with notation software (or by hand!) and software libraries are mainly for playback.
My guess is that among professional VSL users 90-95% belongs to the first category.
I seriously doubt that VSL will spend time and money to develop a library that will interest only 5-10% of their customers. I hope I'm wrong.