Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

183,038 users have contributed to 42,273 threads and 254,974 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 7 new post(s) and 49 new user(s).

  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Vienna MIR & Vienna Suite
  4. Bricast Reverb with VSL
  • H
    H

    You're right. Realistically speaking, they wouldn't, unless the character of the free verb was to their liking. But it's true that most free verb plugins are not great. I wasn't really suggesting that you could shove VSL through any old free reverb. I'm saying that there are very good plugin reverbs that cost a fraction of units like Bricast, and they will probably rival it in terms of fidelity. Try the demos of IK Multimedia's Classic Studio Reverb, Or the Arts Acoustic reverb.

    There are some very inexpensive convolution engines out there too. SIR is even free!

    Like I said, I did an A/B test between Bricast and Roomverb in Cubase. They came out pretty close. You'd be surprised. I would post an mp3 of the results here, but I'm not sure the guy who created the original Bricast music file would approve.

    Look, the fact is that if someone gave me Bricast as an early Christmas present, I'd grab it with a big silly grin all over my face. I'm sure it's a great unit. But there are viable software alternatives which produce amazing results at low cost. [:)]

    PS. There's a reverb plugin called Variverb Pro that is available as a free demo. The demo limitiations are actually pretty generous - it doesn't save or recall new presets. Apart from that you can use it as much as you like. It's still quite buggy, but it sounds great and it's up there with the best of them. Certainly, it's the best "free" reverb out there now.
  • J
    J
    I run VSL through Space designer and have just gotten a Lexicon PCM91 but yet to hook it up. I haven't heard the Bricasti in person, but some of the examples totally blow me away. I respectfully disagree that with Cubase reverb, or other good standards, that one can get that close. That 10% that you're talking about is probably what for me makes the real difference. For myself I'm not talking about just hearing some violins with a little pleasent reverb. For most other music applications (Vocals, drums, etc) reverbs have their role but its more about creating a "framework". But with VSL we need to be tricked into thinking that this is in Syphony Hall, and that's not that easy to do. I'd bet that there are many "power users" running their VSL mixes through a Bricasti, but they don't read this forum unfortunately. I'm suprised that the developers at VSL haven't commented. I'd hardly believe that they'd spend millions developing this virtual world, but not 3000€ to show it in its prettiest dress?
  • H
    H

    I'd like to post the mp3 A/B test for you to judge for yourself. But, as I said, it would not be fair (or perhaps even legal) without approval from the original file's owner.

    Ultimately, you or I or anyone can't really judge for sure without hands-on experience of Bricast. Demo tracks are one thing, but how it works in the real world, and how it integrates into the workflow is the true test.
  • J
    J
    Yes, probably not a good idea to post a sound retreived from others. Maybe soon someone with the unit will come upon the thread and post us some comparative examples of VSL through the various highend reverbs. All best........
  • C
    C

    Is anyone from the Boston area up for creating some demo files? I would be glad to come by with an M7 and spend some time making this happen.

    -Casey

    cdowdell@bricasti.com
  • J
    J
    Hello Casey, Thanks for the interest and availability. I've followed your very informative posts on the GS forum. I hope someone will show up who has some great arrangements using VSL that they can put through your unit. I'm very interested to hear what it sounds like. (p.s. my next reverb unit will probably be an M7!). All best, Jay-Alan Miller Paris, France
  • L
    L

     Hi,

    i am really curious to listen to vsl samples through what seems to be a great new reverb.

    regards

    Laurent

  • R
    R
    The Bricasti is stunning. I found this last year: a cue realized in VSL by Andreas Koslik, run through three different presets on an M7:

    [url=http://www.da-x.de/media/content/kosi_bricasti/Bounces_SN/Orch_pure.mp3] original[/url]

    [url=http://www.da-x.de/media/content/kosi_bricasti/Bounces_SN/Orch_Boston_Hall.mp3]Boston Hall[/url]

    [url=http://www.da-x.de/media/content/kosi_bricasti/Bounces_SN/Orch_Concert_Hall.mp3]Concert Hall[/url]

    [url=http://www.da-x.de/media/content/kosi_bricasti/Bounces_SN/Orch_Scoring_Stage.mp3]Scoring Stage[/url]
  • J
    J
    It sounds fantastic!!! To my ears the Boston Hall preset sounds the most 3 dimentional....... really nice. I don't think I've heard VSL sound so "real" before, but lots of A/B ing would be necessary. I'm starting to think that haveing 2 verbs going at once would be even better; varying with the early reflections and predelays of the 2 to extend the front-backness. Just to be picky, in this example when the bases come in they're not really behing to other strings for me (where thye "should" be). Maybe a little less dry signal for that instrument would do the trick. But I'm thinking that the 2 verb trick might be the best In the VSL videos about the SE Christian (I think it was him) talked about using a second verb for the perc. to put them in their place. What do you guys think?
  • Beat KaufmannB
    Beat KaufmannB

    Hello

    Sorry but I believe that the upper example is a bad one for testing a reverb.

    With long sustained string sounds of a big size ensemble you can't really make out the roomquality of a reverb.

    Even if I listen to the dry original I recognize some room components.

     

    What we need is a complex mix: Staccatos* with the string orchestra and the wood winds, brass with blaring horns or fanafare trumpets, a big organ at the back of the concert hall, percussion instruments somewhere in the room and a piccolo as a soloist just in front of us for example.

    Then let's see whether the bricasti solves this situation brilliantly or not.

    Then let's see how the bricasti manages the different depths, the transparency.

    Then let's see whether it can produce an "airy" and warm room. 

    Then let's compare it with other reverbs. 

    By the way: If you want to produce a finalmix "at one sitting" with several stage depths you need to have

    more than one bricasti... or am I wrong?   

    Beat 

    _________________________________________ 

    *you can "listen to the room" between the staccatos. 

    - Tips & Tricks while using Samples of VSL.. see at: https://www.beat-kaufmann.com/vitutorials/ - Tutorial "Mixing an Orchestra": https://www.beat-kaufmann.com/mixing-an-orchestra/
  • J
    J
    Yes thats right. Bricast is a 2 channel unit. So one stereo reverb. As a side note he new Lexicon PCM96 can do 2 stero reverbs at once, but is reputated a bit less strong on "acoustic space" verbs. On the Gearslutz forum the mixer of the recent Dark Knight soundtrack used 6 Bricasti's for the mix. For VSL we could probably get by with just 2 !!
  • R
    R
    last edited
    last edited

    @jammusique_7634 said:

    On the Gearslutz forum the mixer of the recent Dark Knight soundtrack used 6 Bricasti's for the mix...

    Must not be any staccatos in that score.
  • A
    A
    last edited
    last edited

    I too I'm shopping for reverbs but since good hardwear units like Briscali are out of my reach i had to look at plungins instead. It took me a while but i think i finally found something promising. It's a hybrid between IR and algo and the result sounds very natural to my ears.

    You can do a sort of a/b comparison between Briscali and REFLECT using the same file if you go at the link Beat provided earlier. Download the ''string Boston hall b'' Here:

    http://www.gearslutz.com/board/high-end/127887-bricasti-m7-woohoooo.html

    And then go on the following link and download the ''Boston hall'' file and tell me what you think?

    http://www.virsyn.de/en/E_Products/E_REFLECT/e_reflect.html

    Personally, i think it sounds very good for a EU 167 plugin. But I'll admit i have no engineering talent or experience so i really don't know what I'm doing. Which is why i would like your opinion on this.


    I really liked the reverb from ArtsAcoustic as well but for different reasons.

    I bit more obvious as a reverb but very useful I'm sure. VERY well dome little pluging if you ask me.

    edited: I made a mistake. The price is in EU.

  • A
    A
    last edited
    last edited

    Note that it's not the same mp3 quality.

  • S
    S

    Reflect sounds nice. I've also been thinking about a PCM96 or Bricasti, but you could buy a new Mac Pro for that kind of money. Still, one day I might go for it.

  • A
    A

    Thanks Synthetic.

     I've read that v.1.4 has some new algorithm to help with stage positioning so that's a plus. 1.4 is also VST3 compatible so it can do surround. I don't need this but i thought I'd mention it.

     But what bugs me about this reverb is that it comes with a dongle and you need to pay a second time(20% off) if you want to install it on a second computer. It's not gonna prevent me from buying it but i don't like it.

     Anyone else did the a/b comparison with Briscati? 
  • A
    A
    last edited
    last edited

    Looks like somebody already made IRs of the Bricast. And it sounds pretty good to me.

    edited: I've deleted the link i posted before. I'm not sure about this product at al after all.


  • W
    W

    I'm not too impressed by these IRs made by "Studiodevices."  They really don't compare to the real Bricasti, which sounds incredible.  Furthermore, it's a little sketchy and in very poor taste to copy the real Bricasti so unabashedly.  Not only do they completely rip off the case design, but they also call it "Bree Casedy?"...come on.  

  • A
    A
    I'm not going to argue about the ethics aspect of it that's for sure. And i don't completely feel comfortable with it either. But i cant afford big hardware reverb like that but mostly, i want something good ''in the box'' as they say. Why cant they(and the Lexicon guys etc..) develop good algo reverb plugins? It seems they completely forgot about us, so why should i care about them?

     

    BTW, you're probably one of those who uses Altiverb right? They sampled a whole Lexicon unit so how is that different?
     

    I don't know about the bricasti but I've demoed Reflections LE and these impulses are far superior than any  algo reverb plugins  I've tried. In fact they sound like crap compare to it and they do fell like big expensive units so I'm very happy i found those.  I though the Bree Casedi mp3 sounded pretty. Specially the saxophone, the synth and the guitar.
  • W
    W
    last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    BTW, you're probably one of those who uses Altiverb right? They sampled a whole Lexicon unit so how is that different?

    Yes, Altiverb is one of the options I turn to for reverb.  I don't have a problem with the sampling of Lexicon or other hardware units (Bricasti included) as long as it's legal.  I honestly don't know whether it is or isn't legal, but I assume that a company as reputable as Audioease would have explored this and found it to be legal to make the IRs they have included.  My problem with "Bree Casedy" is not necessarily that they've sampled the unit (again, as long as it's legal).  My problem is that that they're advertising and pushing their product by relying on brand confusion and I find that to be in poor taste.  The picture they have on their site is a clear rip-off of the face design of the Bricasti and their name "Bree Casedy" is a clear rip-off as well.  I happen to know that the developers of the Bricasti were not aware of "Bree Casedy" until after its release when someone brought it to their attention on another forum.