Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

183,593 users have contributed to 42,309 threads and 255,112 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 14 new post(s) and 47 new user(s).

  • Yup! I got my 16GB last week and it's been sweeeeeeeeeeet!

    J.

  • Yo JBM, what kind of performance are you getting out of the new machine, if you wouldn't mind?

    I'm about to take the leap - as soon as I make sure that nothing indispensable will break - and I'm curious what happens when you put in 16GB.

    This time I'm going to sell the old machine while it's still worth something, rather than waiting a year and having it drop down to the what's-the-point-of-selling-it range. :) Too much extra stuff in this machine to do that: PCI SATA/eSATA card, internal hard drive bracket, replacement video card for DVI-D...

  • Hey Nick,

    I haven't really loaded the machine down, yet, in terms of running projects with loads of RAM. But I have noticed, in Activity Monitor, that Logic Pro 8 appears to really put the multi-threading to work - all 8 cores run pretty much evenly, most of the time, and only cranking out around 30%, even at the busiest parts of my current score. So, I'm pretty optimistic about performance capacity, looking into the future! ;-)

    But I'm afraid I don't have too much to report, at this point. I've got a bunch of overlapping, smaller projects, and there's just no room for any new stuff - soon, I hope. If I do something that really loads this thing down, in the next few days, I'll post a quick report.

    cheers,
    J.

  • Thanks, I appreciate it.

  • Crucial is now posting a 2 GB set (1GB x 2) at 320 USD for the new Mac Pro.

  • $160/GB is expensive on my scale, and there are only eight slots. I wouldn't fill them with 1GB chips.

  • Excuse my ignorance, but what makes Mac Pro RAM so special that only certain vendors carry overpriced modules? Certication stuff?

    PolarBear 


  • No, it's having that speed in FB-DIMMs - most places only to up to the 667 MHz stuff, no 800... OWC is cheap, and it's working just fine in my system. macsales.com.

    cheers,

    J.

  • I wonder whether 667 memory works in those machines, even if its performance isn't quite as good. So far I haven't become convinced that memory speed amounts to a hill of beans in the real world, although I'm open to being convinced otherwise.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Nick Batzdorf said:

    I wonder whether 667 memory works in those machines, even if its performance isn't quite as good. So far I haven't become convinced that memory speed amounts to a hill of beans in the real world, although I'm open to being convinced otherwise.


    hehe... It's very likely that the performance is not much different, but almost certainly the new machines will not take slower RAM. They'll take faster RAM, and just run as fast as they can, but not the other way. Too bad.

    J.