Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

183,417 users have contributed to 42,298 threads and 255,072 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 5 new thread(s), 15 new post(s) and 55 new user(s).

  • You can't make a claim such that Kontakt simply doesn't work. Lots of people use it. [*-)]

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Argitoth said:

    You can't make a claim such that Kontakt simply doesn't work. Lots of people use it. [*-)]


    Errrr, you need to learn to read. I haven't said that it doesn't work, I have outlined a specific circumstance where it doesn't work for me...

    DG

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Plowman said:


    Congratulations on being both seventeen and having the ability to form complete and cohesive sentences with a minimum of typos and spelling errors. You are ahead of your generation in this respect. Now go celebrate with some bred and turky.

    That's awesome [:D]

    Hello Argitoth,
    Welcome to the very mature VSL forum!

  • last edited
    last edited

    @DG said:


    On NS Fizbin thought that it could be something to do with Memory Lock, but as I can't find anything in the manual about this elusive setting...
    DG


    Apparently it is not in N2, so just to confirm I can't use K2 as a VST in Nuendo3 (yet). What a waste of money [:(]

    DG

  • It's not a friendly thing to call someone illiterate...

    Hello J Marcos, tell me about yourself: Libraries, software, hardware, age, career.

  • Can't stay long as i'm on a flying visit to Tallin, and sitting in an internet cafe at the moment.
    Daryl, i'm certainly no genius at tech stuff, (although i do know my way around Parchment and quill), but seeing as you have the program, i'm wondering if it's worth trying to 'wrap' K2 in a VST wrapper. I know this might sound daft (probably is), but if the wrapper program reconfigures inputs and memory usage, plus program parameters, as it's designed to do, would this actually 'force' K2 to conform to a particular method of resource use? And if it doesn't work, maybe the wrapper program's diagnostic reporting would give you a clue as to the real problem?

    Regards to you and the rest of the neighbourhood from sunny Tallinn in Estonia!

    Alex.

  • I have a question for the community.

    {RANT}

    Most of you at this VSL community seem to be completely geared toward
    having two machines, lots of ram, Gigastudio or Logic... PC or Mac. It's as if
    some of you know nothing beyond the orchestra-sampled world. What
    about Cubase, Fruityloops, Native Instruments? Reaktor, Absynth?
    Stormdrum, Quantum Leap Ra, Bela D? It's as if some of you have no plan.
    All you want is ONE library, ONE sequencer, ONE computer (or two); spending
    all this money just to be able to use "COMPLETE ORCHESTRAL PACKAGE".
    How will you get anywhere with *just* an orchestra? There's more than just
    VSL.

    Maybe some of you don't realize what it takes to get a career in music. You
    will not make it past a bedroom hobbyist if all you are going to focus on is
    BORING and UNORIGINAL orchestral music, or any other single genre. Film
    requires more than the best orchestrations and the Game industry requires
    a knowledge of every single genre in existence. Rock, Celtic, new
    age, electronica, ambience, breakbeat, chemical, jazz, Latin, west indian,
    east indian, renaissance, and any combinations. Not only that, every career
    with music will require a good knowledge of sound design and that's a
    whole other world in itself.

    {/RANT}

    [H] - So my question, what are your plans? What are your libraries? What
    are your softwares and hardwares? What is your knowledge?

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Argitoth said:

    I have a question for the community.

    {RANT}

    Most of you at this VSL community seem to be completely geared toward
    having two machines, lots of ram, Gigastudio or Logic... PC or Mac. It's as if
    some of you know nothing beyond the orchestra-sampled world. What
    about Cubase, Fruityloops, Native Instruments? Reaktor, Absynth?
    Stormdrum, Quantum Leap Ra, Bela D? It's as if some of you have no plan.
    All you want is ONE library, ONE sequencer, ONE computer (or two); spending
    all this money just to be able to use "COMPLETE ORCHESTRAL PACKAGE".
    How will you get anywhere with *just* an orchestra? There's more than just
    VSL.

    Maybe some of you don't realize what it takes to get a career in music. You
    will not make it past a bedroom hobbyist if all you are going to focus on is
    BORING and UNORIGINAL orchestral music, or any other single genre. Film
    requires more than the best orchestrations and the Game industry requires
    a knowledge of every single genre in existence. Rock, Celtic, new
    age, electronica, ambience, breakbeat, chemical, jazz, Latin, west indian,
    east indian, renaissance, and any combinations. Not only that, every career
    with music will require a good knowledge of sound design and that's a
    whole other world in itself.

    {/RANT}

    [H] - So my question, what are your plans? What are your libraries? What
    are your softwares and hardwares? What is your knowledge?


    Firstly, you have no idea who is in this community. Secondly by your comments you have just proved that you know nothing about orchestral music. How do you know what other skills we all have? Answer, you don't. Thirdly, it is not possible to know everything about every genre, that is why most film and game music is absolute c**p. You could spend a lifetime broadening your horizons (and you should) but you will still find that there are people who know more about every single genre than you do.
    Many of us already have a career in music; wait until you do before you lecture us [8-)]

    DG

  • Argitoth,
    I have absolutely no doubt others will contribute to a discussion, possibly paraphrasing points you have made, but your rant is provocative enough to prompt even I to respond with some degree of mild irritation, so here goes.
    'Most of you at this VSL community seemed to be geared.......'
    I don't know if you read the name on the billboard, but this is a VSL forum, and although the owners of the site are democratic and very reasonable about off topic material, including discussion of other sample bases, we do discuss VSL to a large extent, because that's what this forum is for. If you wish a more general discussion doing the tired old comparison thread, which many of us have participated in before losing interest hearing the same stuff over and over again, I suggest Northern Sounds. You'll be reasonable happy there i suspect, given your 'enthusiasm' for telling all of us how we should run our musical lives.
    As for Cubase, Fruityloops, etc, there are many on this site alone that have used one, two, or all of these products since they started, and i find it a little arrogant on your part that you assume we're all 16 years old, been nowhere, and done nothing. I can remember a time BEFORE these programs were began, and I'm only 45. There are others here even older than that, who have studied with great and well known musicians and composers, and written for Film, TV, etc in all styles.
    'How will you get anywhere with 'just' an orchestra?'
    (See DG,s comment about how little you know)
    Many here (including myself) have samples gained over many years from personal recording, etc, which we use today, little gems that convey sound in a unique and special way outside of normal orchestral arrangements IF THEY'RE REQUIRED. It's because many of us know what we're doing, knowledge gained from experience and PROFESSIONAL use.
    'Maybe some of you don't know what it takes to......'
    I find this extraordinarily arrogant. Most of us ARE writing for a living, be it film, tv, symphonic, ads, libraries etc. By making this statement you have shown you have little or no idea of what it means to be diplomatic. Given your age, and i can't doubt your enthusiasm, it would be wise to back off, and listen. There are others here just starting out, and they've shown the wisdom of asking nicely, LISTENING, and learning much. We're a very supportive bunch, and there are composers here who have written and been successful for longer than you've been alive, so just take a breath before you batter us with your 'superior' I know everything viewpoint. You'll learn in later years, that if you are belligerent with others vastly more qualified and experienced than you, then you'll get nowhere.
    'BORING and UNORIGINAL orchestral music.'
    In this statement alone you have contradicted yourself, and i regret to say, made a fool of yourself. Celtic, Rock, etc. are all Genres many of us ALREADY have experience with. Why is Orchestral music any less relevent than any of these? Is it because you simply 'don't like it', or are foolish enough to dismiss it as 'outdated music.' If you're writing for games, you are going to go hungry, because the bulk of games released today are replete with orchestral music. So get your facts straight before you assume we're all inexperienced children aimlessly 'playing' with music in the bedroom. I've played in many orchestras, rock bands, big bands, jazz bands, etc over the last 30 years. Yes that's right, played. Because many here are professional musicians with performing experience, including playing with great names. (Some of the composers here are great names in their own right, writing for blockbusters.)

    'Not only that, every career with music will require good sound design...'

    TBC.........

  • 'Not only that, every career with music will require good sound design...'

    There are people here who INVENTED and contributed to the development of a lot of the 'sound design' you claim to have knowledge of. Not only that, but because sample bases are far more prominent now, and used more widely than ever before, AND require constant reappraisal of methods of use, people like Beat Kaufmann (The Guru), Jay Bacall, Dave Connor, William Kerston, the VSL team, Paul Robbins, DG, Cwilsher, Martin Bayliss, Alan Belkin, Mike vanbebber, Dave TubaKing, rawmusic, and many others, are pioneering new ways of working with such large sample bases, and developing better end product as a result. In addition, there are many here who actively test different program and hardware combinations, and then have the throroughly human decency to publish those results, helping NEW and experienced composers and users to make more informed and better decisions. And on top of that you get useful information about orchestration and composition as well.
    I suggest you take a deep breath, and acknowledge there are great musicians here who can teach you much. If you continue to preach to them as if they are stupid, don't be surprised if you are ignored, or get caustic responses.
    I'm not being high brow about this, but you might engage your brain, and use a little humility and respect before you consign us all to the bin of musical stupidity. (And if you think I'VE been hard on you, you've got an important lesson in life about to come down on you like a ton of bricks as others, renowned for their passionate and descriptive use of language may be more forthright.)

    Alex.

  • I know that I know hardly anything... and I love it! Because I know there's much to discover.

    I like to learn. And here's a place where people share thoughts, idea's, tips and tricks. And I'm grateful for that.

  • ...and to answer your question:
    I'm 25 years old/young.
    I have Opus 1 and 2, Overdrive Guitar and FX Percussion from VSL.
    I have Attack synth, DX REX, Worra's Prophet and MiniMOOG from Bigga Giggas; 8 bit sounds and various loops and breaks CD's.
    And currently recording percussion myself like soda cans, stones, gaffer tape, computer keyboards...

    Please behave, and be welcome.

    EDIT: also gpt Epic Horns now!! Can't wait to use them (but have for a couple of months...)

  • argitoth, there IS more than VSL, much, much more, but this is the VSL forum... And it would be easy for you to assume that every member here is a devout orchestral fanatic, but the reality (as hermitage59's post has pointed out) is that there are a mixture of types here from all backgrounds, all styles, and all skill levels. Hang around for a while and you will soon pick out who does what and who knows what about, well, what.

    I'm 35, have a bunch of keyboards/synths and synth plugins, Opus 1 with Pro Edition on the way, also plan to buy EWQLSO at some point, and run Logic on a Powerbook. The bulk of my career stuff (mostly performance-related) is on my website, if you get bored enough to check it out.

    It's all very well for you to point out that you're having a rant, but it's better to not have to go down that road at all unless you absolutely have to.

  • last edited
    last edited
    I have one response for this. I created this thread to learn about the community, I wasn't getting enough out of anyone. As you can see the rant was effective. Maybe you should consider if I hadn't made the rant, I'd still be pondering; this is what you might call a "learning experience", sometimes I get that in high school.

    @hermitage59 said:

    There are people here who INVENTED and contributed to the development of a lot of the 'sound design' you claim to have knowledge of.

    Whether or not you think I claimed to have knowledge of sound design, I know I don't have much at all. I don't have much in any area that I've spoken about. I am not disagreeing with anyone except with DG because I love game music.

  • So, Argitoth... do you have anything we could listen to?

  • last edited
    last edited
    Here you go: A Most Jazzy Day (Organ Rock)
    Made with Reason 3.0

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Argitoth said:

    Here you go: A Most Jazzy Day (Organ Rock)
    Made with Reason 3.0


    Heheh - that's pretty good. I jammed along with it actually with more of a Hammond gritty overdriven sound and it was fun. [:)]

    Long time since I played anything in A minor.

    Did you play it or program it?

  • Play it? Program it? To me those are pretty much the same. Actually I always do half and half. I play it and tweak it to perfection; it's really half and half for me.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Argitoth said:

    Play it? Program it? To me those are pretty much the same. Actually I always do half and half. I play it and tweak it to perfection; it's really half and half for me.


    So you program it then. lol

    No - just kidding. Interesting that you might think the actual playing then becomes perfection - after being tweaked. [[;)]]

  • for that comment you die. [H]