Pro Ed String package (from the Cube) don't have any perf-leg's or portamento's. You need the Performance Set for this. Chamber Strings have it all.
Hope this helps,
PolarBear
Hope this helps,
PolarBear
196,695 users have contributed to 43,030 threads and 258,428 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 6 new thread(s), 9 new post(s) and 88 new user(s).
@janila said:
I've always thought that the Opus 1 legato strings don't work as nicely as the brass and especially the renowned woodwinds. There is always a gap between the notes no matter how I tweak the parameters in the Performance Tool. The woodwinds are really superb and I just ordered the French Oboe to add three more legato woodwinds to my Opus 1 set. The strings just don't compare in the legato department even if the sound itself is nice.
Thanks. I'm using Kontakt. If it is a simple programming flaw then why isn't there an update for it? [8-)]@DG said:
You need to set the release time higher in the Giga Editor, assuming that you're on GS. If not, then I haven't a clue how to do it [:O]ops:
DG
If I figure it out I'll let you know; that is as soon as I manage to stop it crashing Nuendo. So much for being more stable than GS [:(]I use Kontakt and Kontakt 2 under Cubase SX3 and it hasn't always been easy. Most of the time I end up feeling that it is the Cubase causing the problems. Steinberg is ultra-slow in reacting to bugs. Native Instruments isn't perfect either but personally I end up fearing for Cubase or Windows to crash instead of the sampler. I guess I'm waiting for the Mactels and the first efficient Cubase version for Macintosh to arrive. [[;)]]
@DG said:
Herb very kindly posted the steps to make the release time controllable by using the Modwheel. This way I could simulate either legato slurs or bow changes by the length of the release.
@Rodney_G said:
Now this really has me worried. I don't want to "simulate" legato slurs, I expect true recorded legato transitions between notes (not portamento glides), but regular slurred legato (with recorded transitions) as in the other instruments. Is that possible with the strings performance legato or not?
Clearing up this matter would be much appreciated.
Thank's in advance
Cheers
Rodney
@janila said:
I've always thought that the Opus 1 legato strings don't work as nicely as the brass and especially the renowned woodwinds. There is always a gap between the notes no matter how I tweak the parameters in the Performance Tool. The woodwinds are really superb and I just ordered the French Oboe to add three more legato woodwinds to my Opus 1 set. The strings just don't compare in the legato department even if the sound itself is nice.
@janila said:
I've always thought that the Opus 1 legato strings don't work as nicely as the brass and especially the renowned woodwinds. There is always a gap between the notes no matter how I tweak the parameters in the Performance Tool. The woodwinds are really superb and I just ordered the French Oboe to add three more legato woodwinds to my Opus 1 set. The strings just don't compare in the legato department even if the sound itself is nice.
@mosso said:
Earlier on in this thread Herb said to check out the +RC mapping variations, but these don't seem to be in Opus 1 (there are +RS , but not +RC)...
Am I missing something?
Martin
@janila said:
Let me rephrase this by pointing out that all the responses to the original post suggested some kind of action to make the legato better instead of saying "the VSL legato sounds like that, deal with it." To me it seems that the legato strings sound like the example in the beginning of this thread, somewhat disconnected. Most of the time I end up layering samples from VSL and others to get a nice flowing string sound. I might be biased because I play violin myself but that doesn't change the fact that there isn't such a gap in string legato. There isn't a gap in a solo string performance and section sound should be even more continuous as the players don't change the notes exactly simultaneously.