dietz, it's not worth the effort. some guys are lyvaughned and others are foycoffah [[;)]] (sorry for my bad english)

@evanevans said:

I couldn't agree with you more mvanbebber. It's been extremely frustrating to have to be witness to such odd behaviour. It's Bb Trumpets, Extended Violin Upper Range, Harmonics, Muted Brass, 2nd Violins. Holy cow are those so much more important than so many other samples that have been released. They aren't just wierd REQUESTS. These are STANDARDS! I will say that again:

STANDARDS

Pro Edition, and VSL in general is still lacking those professional elements IMNSHO.

Evan Evans

Ah, but you see this is your "most wanted" list, it may not be everyone else's. Please remember that customers who do not write for a living have just as much right to ask for new instruments as you do. I can state for the record that I have no particular interest in Bb trumpet samples or an extended violin range, although if both of these were available i would probably buy them anyway. Now harmonics... [:)]

DG

Hey Evan, hurry up, the muted brass can be downloaded for free only a few days more! In case you didn't notice yet.

I will repeat myself here (look for the dozen other topics in the board history on this): I think more realism is achieved using twice as much articulations, instead of having just another timbre at choice, where this or that is not possible because those things were only recorded with the one or the other instruments choice. You will bring up the unison lines again, and I think there are enough articulations availible to come around the shortcomings of it. Read: Legato articulation plus regular ones perfectly fit each other if legato is needed. If legato has to be avoided there are (apart from sustains perhaps) enough choices you usually feed your alternation mode with to be used at once. If you can't find a way around you can add chamber strings violins to the regular ensmbles. If that's too small add the violas instead (perhaps pitch those up a step or two to match timbre if you going to nitpick about that, I'd rather nitpick about lack of vibrato expression). Put solo strings on top... Get your newly achieved prepanned Gold Edition to play alongside. Go down under looking for your dusted GOS box. Use other choices (notice I'm still talking about unison lines)... Endless discussion... I agree it might be harder to choose alternatives if the aim is to emulate a perfect string quartet or quintett (?). But for sections... (Didn't they say somewhere that the current violin section will be the second one once the symphonic cube will arise, or was that only with the flute?)

All the best,
PolarBear

What's everyone all worked up about? It ain't my list at all. These are standards.

Evan Evans

@Another User said:

Thanks a lot.
/Dietz

Are you being sarcastic? If you are I don't appreciate it. Can't you VSL guys contain your emotions? It is a business you know. This is maybe the hundredth time you've responded so horribly to users feedback. A simple, "thank you, we have considered and made note of your requests and at this time some of it is being taken into consideration. Schedule and budget dictate much of our affairs, but we hope to add some of your requests to our library at some point in the future." Is that so hard? is everyone in Vienna so defensive? How about dignity? Diplomacy? Aren't those great aspirations? Or is Pride just too darned hard to resist?

Evan Evans

FWIW, didn't Herb post a while back that they tried sampling second violins and found the difference in sound to be too subtle to be worth the effort? Given VSL's approach - same detailed list of articulations for every instrument, same room, etc. - it makes intuitive sense to me that this would be the case.

Also, Craig S. showed me a really effective technique: layering the Chamber Strings with the VL-14s, but fading the small section up and down to introduce vibrato. That might be your answer.

Oh, Evan. Just shut the f*** up, please. Soon we have lost you again.
Why do you always want to hear the answers YOU want to hear? This is NOT openness for god's sake! Or whatever whom's.

And, Dietz, trust your customers intelligence. One or two bad mouths won´t make the whole community doubt your efforts.

@mathis said:

Oh, Evan. Just shut the f*** up, please. Soon we have lost you again.
Why do you always want to hear the answers YOU want to hear? This is NOT openness for god's sake! Or whatever whom's.

And, Dietz, trust your customers intelligence. One or two bad mouths won´t make the whole community doubt your efforts.

... I trust them _a lot_!

Everybody can express her/his doubts about our project, even here (especially here, actually), in our own forum. I just can't stand this ridiculous "one step forward, two steps back"-attitude that makes all our other custumers' postings appear in a dimwitted, foolish context.


/Dietz

Evan, take a deep breath and don´t let you wind up by this last comment even more.
Don´t you two guys recognize that you´re always pushing the exact same buttons again and again?

Dietz has over and over graciously defended his company. Mr.Evans is,plain and simple, a very poor communicator. His posts have consistantly inflamed and insulted. His entitlement is laughable and his skills do not back up his arrogance. He's no fun! Just go away Evan! You are not helpful and I think a majority here are tired of you working out your neuroses at our expense. Get a different therapist.

Thanks for everything VSL team.

Evan, you are annoying and this topic is closed.
And I've deleted the last three of your postings.