Welcome to the colourful world of prejudices.
Waiter, one more beer!
Waiter, one more beer!
183,214 users have contributed to 42,284 threads and 255,018 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 21 new post(s) and 56 new user(s).
I'm telling you William. You are in a box. I told you before, you couldn't understand, and I see now why. You are in a box.@William said:
Evans
I don't understand that originality means nothing in today's film scoring world?
Is that a joke?
To me this is the most basic fact of commercial film scoring. Sadly enough.
@William said:
dcoscina,
Sorry also to be a bit harsh there in defending old Erich Wolfgang. I actually agree with a lot of your points. We had quite a discussion of Korngold a while back.
@William said:
Your post is so arrogant and egocentric that it borders on the irrational. That is the only possible response to such nonsense.
My post is a beacon of open mindedness. Your post previous to that was selfish and irresponsible. You said that professors are unsuccessful composers. You defended Herrmann by berating others. Your generalizations are irresponsible and typically berating. I won't stand for it.@William said:
Mr. Evans
Your post is so arrogant and egocentric that it borders on the irrational. That is the only possible response to such nonsense.
Well, technically, claiming that your response is "the only possible response" is in itself arrogant and egocentric.Yeah, this is why I told him he couldn't understand. It requires one to step out of their box to understand. He's afraid of being open minded. And his response to my post "calling him out", was typical ego protection mechanism. The closer you get someone like that to breaking through their ego membrane, the more irrascible and inflammatory they become. They fight and claw at the walls. Eventually becoming animal. This is especially true if the breakthrough is based on a chemical dependancy. In some brains even "feeling protected" can be a strong chemical dependancy.
LOL! ok. [;)]@PaulR said:
Evan, stop being a big sulking baby. What's the matter with you? If you don't agree with something, just state it and give reasons. That's fair, isn't it? Come on, take it easy.
oh yeah, and I'm trying to figure out what the hell you mean, Evan, by "from an anthropomorphic perspective"... hurricane William? the wrath of William (aka Zeus)? The King of the pride had the fierceness of William. ...it's probably pretty interesting, whatever you're getting at...LOL. Funny you picked up on that line, because it was one of the more abstract things I said. I didn't really think anyone would notice that. I meant, that from a perspective of learning about a subject by observation ... William is fascinating. And I was drawing parallel to how zoologists study various species. It was somewhat sarcastic, but also a bit of a truth. I do find William's unique perspective's fascinating, and his unnatural behavior comfortably predictable.