Gugliel,

As much as I would like to see the Performance Tool become a plug-in tool instead of a stand-alone tool, please don't misunderstand my general admiration and satisfaction with this library. In my opinion, the VSL library stands well on its own without the Performance Tool. However, the automatic processing of MIDI messages simply gives an added edge of realism to the instruments that is otherwise just not found in the sampling world. I don't think your concerns are irrational, but the problems with the Performance Tool might not be quite as bad as you may believe.

The issues I had with the Performance Tool were strictly ease-of-use and flexibility (it forces me to use a whole port for Performance-routed instruments). Also, it took me a LONG time to find a way of integrating it into my single-computer system (it literally involves me re-routing MIDI to an external loopback, then back into my system on another port).

I was just asking the folks at VSL to look into alternative mechanisms of employing the same functionality, because I ultimately think it would be better for everyone if there were easier-to-use solutions. Other people have apparently had stability issues with the tool. However, it's been quite stable on my system once I got the MIDI routing figured out. The only other pet peeve of mine (which is sort of nitpicky) is that now that GS3 is rewireable, my entire system can be saved and loaded all via one master controller (my sequencer), except for the Performance Tool.

The bottom line is: Even knowing the Performance Tool quirks, I'd still highly recommend VSL as a great sample library that can stand on its own merits. The fact of the matter is that sampling technology is still in its infancy, relativelys speaking. Streaming hard-disk recording via Gigastudio was something of a revolution in opening up near unlimited sized samples, but we'll have to be patient as more advanced performance techniques are developed along with these new technologies.

james, why don't you download and install the VSL MidiRouter (virtual midi cable) - at least then you would only need to block one channel instead of a whole port and free up a physical midiport as well
christian

James Boer, thanks for your comments and clarification. Well put. Over the past few days I've been working (still with Horizon Solo Strings) with the legato mode instruments in gigastudio 3, driven by midi. Weird as the approach seemed to me at the beginning, and wasteful of precious loaded-up memory as it is, I'm getting some really good legato lines with direct programming in midi. It takes one extra note (a key switch) per musical note, plus selective transposition up 4 octaves when the direction of the interval is down, but it does work. Again, it suits me better to do this while I'm 'scultping' the line then to rely on an external program to do it for me -- but I've been known to walk when I could drive and drive when I could fly, too!

My two cents on the Performance Tool is that it is a very mild inconvenience (if that) and yields the greatest innovation in sampling history which is true legato (not found in any library.) The fact that a new release of a third party program (GS3) is not up to speed is a non issue. The tool has never crashed my (XP) system and is extremely simple in it's use and comprehension thereof.

Dave Connor

cm, thanks for the tip. I wasn't aware there WAS a VSL virtual MIDI cable. At the moment, though, my system is working fine. And, with GS3 on its way (should be here any day now), dedicating a port for the Performance Tool won't be as bad.

I tried earlier using a freeware set of virtual MIDI ports (I forget the name), but I never could get the wiring working correctly. The whole reason I went to an external wiring scheme was to get it working at all.

And Dave, I wholeheartedly agree that the Performance Tool is a wonderful bit of functionality. And, once it's working*, it really is only a minor bit of inconvenience.

* Note the key phrase here. [[;)]]

One thing I'm curious about. Dave, you said that GS3 was "not up to speed." Does this mean that the legato MIDI-processing rules in GS3 are incompatible with VSL? If so, that's seems somewhat lame, especially as they've been touting VSL as one of Gigastudio's premiere libraries! [*-)]

may i step in - lets say VSL is incompatible with iMidi legato. now the limitation of 32 dimensions is history so a lot of new possibilities are coming up. seems to make no sense for me to support an old workaround.
another issue: how to replace .pal and .vlp files to load different configurations for the same instruments?
christian

James,

I gathered from the previous posts that using the midi processing in GS3 was not a seemless transition from using the performance tool. I don't have GS3 yet so I really don't know (cm seems to clarify above.)

I can understand you not being thrilled with the PT if you've had tons of problems with it. I haven't had any consistant problems but I'm not running a sequencing program on the same machine (I run DP on a Mac.) It has always struck me as a very solid program, but we all pull our hair out over different things. Didn't mean to nullify any legitimate issues you may have.

Preparing to pull hair and a few teeth upon purcase of GS3 [:O]

Dave Connor

Lol, I should really quit while I'm ahead.

I really think people are still misinturpreting my intentions and attitude regarding the Performance Tool. It took me quite a while to get the PT working on my system, but it's fine now. And, I really like it. It's a great piece of software. [:)]

But to me, the real genious is how the keyswitching setup combined with the MIDI processing rules, not the little utility itself. It just seemed to me like there should be a way to make some sort of plugin that alters the MIDI stream in the same way. This would give all of the benefits and make it so much easier for any new user. However, cm kindly replied and mentioned there were some timing issues that were discovered.

Not to sound too altruistic, but in essense, I'm mostly just trying to help VSL become a better and more user-friendly product (I guess that's the computer programmer in me coming out). Heck, I got the Tool working on my system now, so I can live happily with the PT as it is. But anyone who buys this product with the intention of using a sequencer and sampler on a single PC is going to face the same sort of tricky setup problems that I faced.

Anyhow, thanks for the replies guys. I didn't mean to drag this out so long. I'll be getting GS3 fairly soon myself, so I guess I'll soon find out first-hand how the MIDI-processing stuff works.

Oh, and apologies for the somewhat Gigastudio-themed topic here on the main thread. Probably should have been in the Gigastudio section. [[;)]]

@Another User said:

There will be arttfiles for multi dynamic performance legati.
No plans to abandon the performance tool.

How are these progressing?

I'min the process of making my GS3 template.... so I would really like these files! [:)]

James, being part of "anyone" I'd just like to add I had only minor understanding issues with the installation (mixed up in&out hehe) of the PT with everything on 1 PC. So I can't confirm that everyone will experience problems with it, in fact I have not experienced any issues so far.

Btw. virtual cables are the way to go, there is the sticky topic at Giga section mentioning it since more than a year now, I wonder how you could that have missed...

PolarBear

@PolarBear said:

James, being part of "anyone" I'd just like to add I had only minor understanding issues with the installation (mixed up in&out hehe) of the PT with everything on 1 PC. So I can't confirm that everyone will experience problems with it, in fact I have not experienced any issues so far.

Btw. virtual cables are the way to go, there is the sticky topic at Giga section mentioning it since more than a year now, I wonder how you could that have missed...

PolarBear

I'm glad you had a better experience than I did, though. Just based on the size of that post though, and the number of related posts this forum receives, my entire (original) point was there seem to be a lot of people that have initial trouble like I did, and I was suggesting an alternative course of development to help alleviate that - that's all.

Oh, and by "experiencing problem", you realize I'm only refering to problems understanding how to properly set the tool up, correct? I'm not talking about operational problems. Once you figure it out, everything works great.

Also, keep in mind that writing music isn't exactly my day job. So, I didn't exactly spend all my waking hours for the past year trying to figure this out. [[;)]]

Yes I meant of course installation (with it)... so the only thing I got wrong was pretty basic for anyone dealing with MIDI. Technically, it worked flawless afterwards, too. But then again I read the forums more often so I might have run into more issues not knowing how to deal them if I wouldn't.