I added a small comment on the issue in the VI and memory configuration thread as well... [[;)]]
/Mattias
/Mattias
-
Daryl, do what you do best and get on with that link I forwarded instead... [[;)]]
/Mattias
-
-
Haha, I knew it! You have way too much spare time... [:D]
/Mattias
No, I just avoid work wherever possible and with the builders in, you can't expect an artiste of my calibre to work with noise going on [[:|]] Well actually, I haven't seen them for over a week, but they might come in today and I would have to start some work only to have to stop because I've got a headache.
In any case I've still got a few DVDs that I haven't watched yet, so it must be time to stop work for the day.
DG
-
Hey DG for us 'low-tech hacks' - could you tell me how to get my 4 slaves set up for this 3 gig switch. What is it exactly (soft or hardware). The .exe you mentioned.
My 4 machines all have 2 gig ram but range in age form 2 months to 2 years old (2.7 to 3.2 ghz).
Thanks for any help you can be on this.
Rob
It is all software based.
The switch is an alteration to the boot.ini file in order that Windows allows you to use up to 3GB for applications and 1GB for Windows as opposed to 2GB each. Even with only 2GB RAM there can be an advantage in using the switch (for me it was around 200MB of samples), but it can make the system unstable. I have sent all details to VSL and they are testing at the moment.
In the meantime, let me know what host you are intending to use on your VI machines.
DG
Hi DG,
I am using VStack on the VI PC's.
Rob
-
Hi DG,
I am using VStack on the VI PC's.
Rob
As you'll see from my tests I managed to get V-Stack to load well over 2.5GB samples, but it is not really designed to do this so you could have crashes. I would recommend the 3GB switch in any case, but if you really want to try to load 2.8GB in V-Stack PM me, and I'll "talk" you through it.
FWIW the next version of Forte will be designed this way, so you might want to try that out when it is released.
DG
-
Hi DG,
I am using VStack on the VI PC's.
Rob
As you'll see from my tests I managed to get V-Stack to load well over 2.5GB samples, but it is not really designed to do this so you could have crashes. I would recommend the 3GB switch in any case, but if you really want to try to load 2.8GB in V-Stack PM me, and I'll "talk" you through it.
FWIW the next version of Forte will be designed this way, so you might want to try that out when it is released.
DG
You're a great resource and help DG. Many thanks!!!!
Rob
-
There is a description here http://community.vsl.co.at/viewtopic.php?p=60489">http://community.vsl.co.at/viewtopic.php?p=60489
/Mattias
-
Very interesting thread!
unless I dreamt it I read somewhere (NS maybe) that someone was running 2 instances of VSTack simultaneously on the same pc - anyone tried this? I run giga and VSTack side by side so am utilising about 3gb ram at the moment.
Ian
-
I run giga and VSTack side by side so am utilising about 3gb ram at the moment.
Very interesting, Ian, that's what I trying to do here on an external slave PC with an RME card. Are you using ASIO for VSTack? Do you find you need to increase the buffer (latency) to use both at the same time?
best, Dom
-
Very interesting thread!
unless I dreamt it I read somewhere (NS maybe) that someone was running 2 instances of VSTack simultaneously on the same pc - anyone tried this? I run giga and VSTack side by side so am utilising about 3gb ram at the moment.
Ian
How so you use 3Gb without the switch? I could only get a tiny amount from GS with the switch installed. Without it I didn't think that one could use more than 2Gb anyway. Do spill the beans......
BTW I tried GS alongside VI and GS caused some sort of feedback and VI hardly loaded anything!
DG
-
@DG said:
Without it I didn't think that one could use more than 2Gb anyway. Do spill the beans......
Technically the limit is 2GB per process...so if you have more than one process (as in GS and some VST host) you should be able to use more than 2GB even without the 3GB switch.
And in fact I think that if you plan to use both GS and your VST host on a machine you should not set the 3GB switch as it totally wrecks GS's abilities to load many samples... Without the switch you should get a reasonable balance between the two.
/Mattias
-
@DG said:
Without it I didn't think that one could use more than 2Gb anyway. Do spill the beans......
Technically the limit is 2GB per process...so if you have more than one process (as in GS and some VST host) you should be able to use more than 2GB even without the 3GB switch.
/Mattias
Are you sure (I sound like "Millionaire" now) because I used to think this, and then I was told that the 2Gb limit was also the total amount of memory usable for applications? I'm sure that you know more than I do, but I haven't managed to get more than 1.8Gb with either one or multiple applications.
DG
-
I can confirm this. Atleast I can confirm that after GS3 gives up and wont load more stuff, I can open up a chainer and load up stuff there.
-
@Christian Marcussen said:
I can confirm this. Atleast I can confirm that after GS3 gives up and wont load more stuff, I can open up a chainer and load up stuff there.
Yes, I'm not disputing that you can load more stuff, it's how much more I'm interested in. I managed about 150Mb, but then I was only testing one of the 2Mb machines.
DG
-
Ah ok. Well I have not tested how much in MB's but I can load atleast 8 keyswitches patches from RA. That should definately be more than 150mb
On 2gb machines btw,