@Another User said:

3) VSL is now a software company. All samples tied to their software. How will they be with updates when OS's move on? once they have our $10K how nice are they going to be about updates. Or do they pull out some Waves WUP BS. So far their have been no statements in this regard.
4) How good are they out working out software bugs ??? There are so many host apps, so many computer variables. NI seems to have been suffering with their MAC apps so why not VSL too? I can easily imagine mac users getting much less performance than PC users? and how quickly will VSL move to Macintel?

Herb said in another thread that any update to universal binaries for intel based macs will be free.

The VSL price doesn't hurt me, just like a lot of users it's the upgrade path that is not....well you've read this already.But I don't really like this idea of VSL being a luxury, it's a kind of elitist thing: if the prices where lower probably they would sell a lot more and maybe earn more money.The point behind this is some people like the idea of being a kind of small group of "professionals"able to buy something.I don't care if a lot of people have access to this library cause for some of them who didn't have the chance to learn how to write/compose/orchestrate etc...it could be a way of learning a lot about an orchestra along with some books of course.And for the others who would think they are going to instantly produce orchestral stuff with the VSL, as you know if you don't know what you're doing, if you have no experience about writing, orchestration etc.... it will sound terrible even if the indidual sounds are great; just playing them like keyboard parts will end with very poor result.

Miguélez, I think you are partly right and partly wrong at the same time...You probably know that wages differ in countries. In the north of Europe, minimum wages are probably 3 or 4 times higher than in Spain, where I come from... same as in your country if compared, let's say, with the States, where you can pull out a 2 minutes cue and receive a 4 or 5 digit paycheck.

In countries like mine where industry is not as developped as in other countries, prices for pro people don't always match other pro's salaries. And for some pro people doing a living with it paying a house, a family and sample libraries is not always that possible to have the latest.

Maybe you are in a position where you can get all those samples very easily and you don't have to "complain" as you mentioned about prices; I'm happy for you.

But IMO even if you want to buy a Mercedes you will try to acheive the best deal, even if you are rich, unless you are probably a fool.

Just my 2 c.

Iván

"I actually like the fact that this library is a luxory. And a luxory, by definition, is not meant for every single body."
Fernando

Wow! [H]

Ivan:

@Another User said:

But IMO even if you want to buy a Mercedes you will try to acheive the best deal, even if you are rich, unless you are probably a fool.

Most of the time yes, of course. But there are some other times when it just feels like a pleasure to buy certain things.... Especially when you know that not only are you getting some of the best sounds/tools available, but also supporting the advance of technology. Also, you can confidentally charge your clients more [:)]
Serioulsly. There are libraries out there to meet everyone´s budget. Why on earth complaining when VSL doesn´t fit someone´s budget?
What I mean by all this is basically: You get great new technology that will allow you to work faster and more efficiently. You also get incredible sounds, you will be able to load more instruments and worry more about composing music than programming. I think VSL is, as this post´s title reads, much more than fair, even cheap...

Sorry, that´s just the way I see it. You get what you pay for. That´s why there are regular things, good things, and great things. There MUST be a difference.

Cheers,
Fernando

I personnally prefer a non elitist world, people tend to live better... just like with education, being part of an elite does not make someone a better person than the others.

Ivan:

@Another User said:

Miguélez, I think you are partly right and partly wrong at the same time...You probably know that wages differ in countries. In the north of Europe, minimum wages are probably 3 or 4 times higher than in Spain, where I come from... same as in your country if compared, let's say, with the States, where you can pull out a 2 minutes cue and receive a 4 or 5 digit paycheck.

Actually, you are right. Point well taken. So I can only speak about how it is in my country. So let me put it this way:
If there are any of my country fellow musicians in here (which I doubt they´d be too many), AND you are one of the forum members that complain about the pricing: DO NOT DISPAIR!!! You´re just one Jingle away from being able to purchase the SC Standard library, and if your client is nice and represents a decent account, you will be able to even buy the whole full library, even if you didn´t own the Pro Edition already. [[:D]]

Well, actually more like 2 Jingles away, since you will be looking at AT LEAST 35% import tax, on top of what you pay for the library, plus whatever the dealer´s cut might be. [:(]

So yes, it is a pricey library. But if you really NEED it, it most likely means you should/could afford it. Look at it as a good investment (as opposed to a new car). In most cases it´s tax deductible (sorry, fellow Mexicans, this does not apply to you unless you are registered as Importer, or pay still more for the dealer´s cut. And good luck finding one ... ) and it will be an awesome tool that will help your music sound SO MUCH better (providing you are a good composer, as I know you are) and work more efficiently.

You can also do a lot of this with other libraries, so I think people should get what they can at that moment.

The ones that feel they are paying for the same sample twice, they could see it differently: They are NOT paying twice. The rest of the money is just going into the new sounds AND the VI, AND the 24 bits. PLUS, you will be able to load almost twice as many instruments on your same machines! Think how many less computers that means, and how many less samplers and side licenses (unless you already bought them [:)] ) and less maintainance that means...

.... and people call that much worse things than a bad deal?!?!?!?!?!?!? [[:|]]

What angers me the most is the way some people have reacted to this. They have even called this "a Fraud". They have been very insulting and pressing too hard.

Anway, we might never agree on this, so just do what you think it´s best for you.

Ya no hagas corages. [[:D]]
Te mando un saludo,


Fernando

I've got only two cliche's that come to mind when it comes to the "best" equipment, and the quest for the best....And this applies to everything in life in general.

1. It's not the Wand, it's the magician (80% magician, 20% wand)
2. It's not the golf clubs, it's the golfer. (I'll bet Phil Mickleson and Tiger Woods can beat any one of us on this forum with 50 year old garage sale clubs, even if we had state of the art equipment.)

uhhhhh, what was my point again? [:)]

uhhh, I guess your point is that owning this library won´t make anyone a better composer.
It certainly won´t do a thing about the composition and/or orchestration.
All it will do is just make it SOUND more real and beautiful.
If it´s a nice composition, and it is well orchestrated, it will sound amazing. But, if it´s a poor composition, it will sound like a shitty piece with nice sounds, I guess...

About the Tiger Woods thing: Yes he would. And also Wagner beats us with just some score paper and a pencil !! [[;)]]

Cheers

Yes! Thats it Miguel....Thanks for reiterating that for me [[;)]]

@dunk187 said:

2. It's not the golf clubs, it's the golfer.

Yes, but even though I have never played a round of golf in my life, if I were to play Tiger Woods and I had golf clubs, but he had a badminton racket, I bet I'd win. [;)]

Lee Blaske

@Lee Blaske said:

Yes, but even though I have never played a round of golf in my life, if I were to play Tiger Woods and I had golf clubs, but he had a badminton racket, I bet I'd win. [;)]

Lee Blaske

I'll take that bet. It may take him more strokes to get to the green, but he'd wipe up on the putting green.

Ha ha ha.....Exactly... [:P]