A quick introduction of the topic, and a few questions for Dietz and the VSL experts:
Synchron-ized libraries offer by default several new features vs. the VI original version:
- a Synchron Player articulation management and sample storage/playback that can offer some workflow and performance advantage or alternatives.
- a sophisticated internal mixer, with MIX presets, powered by Synchron Stage IR and FX chain, masterfully crafted and ready-to-use, providing a sound ready to mix with Synchron collection libraries, and other Synchron-ized libraries "out-of-the-box".
But of course, the "Synchron StageA" preset and default IR are not limiting the use and application of the Synchron-ized libraries. The pristine dry sound of the library is still available, eQ, IR, balance, power-pan and FX chain are fully customizable, and they can be activated or excluded on demand according the user's need and intention.
This important feature enable the use of any external positioning, virtual stage, and ambience effect chain, and of course, the use of MIR Pro with different venues, or in case of the Synchron StageA venue, of different positions and mic settings on the stage, compared to the default Synchron-ized presets.
The Synchron Player engine has been already programmed to interact with VE Pro and MIR Pro in a pretty intelligent way: e.g. it automatically deactivate some eQ and IRs if a preset is loaded into MIR Pro, and MIR "guess" function is recognizing the Synchron-ized library and loading the corresponding instrument profile, including characters and Room Eq.
I've the following open questions and comments to be verified by the VSL team:
- is the "intended and proper" use of Synchron-ized libraries into MIR Pro described in any manual or tutorial? (perhaps it is, but I didn't find it yet)
- for the Synchron-ized Dimension Strings sections "all players" a default preset is missing the position of single players into the section (because it is supposed to be defined by the IR, but the IR is now disabled to let you work with MIR instead...).
I suppose it can be restored manually, perhaps following the example of the "noCon" presets: the pan balance of each player is different and is defining the relative position, then the power-pan is defining the stereo field. What's the recommended power-pan for best compatibility with the MIR Pro "8 players" etc.? Is the single player eQ helping in this case, or is it interfering with the MIR instrument profile?
(it obviously interfere with a solo instrument profile, but I'm not sure about the whole section profile).
Yes, I did experiment and had my ears judge, but a technically correct briefing should help a lot to start and guide the research: thank you in advance for any hint and suggestions on the topic!