Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

196,219 users have contributed to 43,015 threads and 258,397 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 9 new post(s) and 165 new user(s).

  • BTW, I'm wondering what's up with the Celesta part. In some places it seem almost to disappear and the pitches are strange, as if it's played an octave or a 5th higher, or something. It certainly doesn't sound like the Celesta part in the Prom performance - which is what I've been accustomed to forever.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Macker said:

    BTW, I'm wondering what's up with the Celesta part. In some places it seem almost to disappear and the pitches are strange, as if it's played an octave or a 5th higher, or something.

    Does this also happen in the Teldex version? I'll check it again against the score.

    What you suggest about the reverb is to make it more artificial than using a convolution reverb. I'm not convinced of this solution, but I’ll do an experiment in shortening the reverb time in MIR, and increasing the importance of the artificial reverb I use only for smoothening.

    While artificial reverbs tend to sound good, I find them generally less convincing than MIR. A compromise could be making the presence of the smoothening artificial reverb stronger, but then again it will sound as an artificial reverb and not a spatialization. It's in any case one of the possible techniques to be explored.

    Paolo


  • Celesta part issues are the same in both versions. Worst case is at 1:18 when the Celesta should easily be heard above the quiet Harp ostinato but seems totally absent. Another case is at 0:28 when Celesta should be there but there seems to be something very high-pitched instead, perhaps the Glock. Is the Celesta there at all, and is it perhaps just the Glock part I'm hearing where the Celesta is missing? I've just pulled out the B&H score to have a look through.


  • One thing about combining reverbs -  certain venues in MIR can be used with the MIRacle close orchestral enhance, as an overall addition to the sound, and it works beautifully.  Though to use it, the convolution reverb  Wet must be turned down overall.   The advantage of that system is it has a richness but also more clarity than just convolution with more Wet.  For a while I was routing the Vienna Konzerthaus  Close Orchestral Stage, somewhat more Dry than default middle setting, into a Lexicon hardware reverb which had a Large Hall at around 40% Wet. This sounded really great and was used on a couple entire music library albums of mine. However, I discovered that MIRacle does the exact same thing without the external hardware and so have been using that on several mixes and love it.        

    There was some talk about the celesta - it is a unique sound and I've had trouble with it. It doesn't cut through the orchestra like glockenspiel, but if you turn it up in volume the low/mid frequencies are exaggerated. This of course because of the close up recording as opposed to where it is placed in an orchestral setting.  I think I used an individual dry adjustment, and some EQ to tone down the low/mid.

    Anyway I think overall it's sounding great and can just use some little adjustments to increase the clarity here and there.  The amazing thing about MIR is default settings are close to perfect! So if one does not stray too far from those, and just tweak things a little, it works wonderfully.    


  • William and Macker, thank you for your support!

    Before thinking to the reverb, maybe I solved the issue of the Celesta. I had it sounding one octave too high. Maybe a case of double transposition? Dorico is for sure transposing. But the Vienna Player seems to be in the real pitch.

    The VSL manuals says that the instrument is mapped one octave lower than written so it's probably already transposed, despite the shown octave transposition is zero. 

    The same happens with the Glockenspiel.

    Macker: congratulation for catching it! Not easy, with these pure-harmonics sounds!

    At this point, I don't know if I should change the octave in the VSL sounds, or remove octave transposition in Dorico. I think I will do the former, to always deal with the real pitch. It's the same with the double basses.

    Paolo


  • last edited
    last edited

    I've updated the "old" version with the due changes to the mallets (and several other small things fixed). The link in the initial post is now updated.

    I've also tried a version with more MIRacle, and a reduced mix/tail of MIR. I've probably not done a great job, since I find it not very realistic, and without that "gloss", making the sound seem to be immersed in the space, that I find in the MIR/less MIRacle version.

    Holst - Mercury (VI) (with less MIR and more MIRacle)

    I must be the biggest fan of pure MIR!

    Paolo

    EDIT: Added a version for the Synchron libraries (with Synchronized Woodwinds and VI Harps).

    Holst - Mercury (Synchron)


  • last edited
    last edited

    I've added some more espressivo-style details to the score.

    Not being undecided enough with the reverb matter, I'm now undecided about limiting or not. The loudest part seems to ask for it.

    I've tried with two limiters: Steinberg's own Limiter included in Dorico, with the Protection preset. I think this introduced some harshness that was not what I like. The, I used a modeled Vari µ in Limiting mode, and with parallel compression on to let much of the dry signal pass untouched.

    I thing the Vari µ is doing a good job with the loudest passages. However, it also seems to do something to the softer dynamics, compressing the ppp-mp range as well. It shouldn't, but by emulating a tube circuitry, it is probably always compressing a little. As a consequence, I find the non-compressed version slightly more transparent.

    Which one do you prefer? The difference is subtle, but it is there.

    Holst - Mercury (with no limiting)

    Holst - Mercury (limiting)

    Paolo


  • I updated it again. I got a chance to fix some mistakes, and work a bit more on the dynamics. This is a piece that goes from tiny, cristalline 'pings', to the most massive burst of sound. Not easy to keep it under control.

    Paolo


  • Hi Paolo.

    Just listened to your work. What a start for me in the new year!

    All the best


    VI Special Edition 1-3, Reaper, MuseScore 3, Notion 3 (collecting dust), vst flotsam and jetsam
  • Fabio, thank you for listening!

    Happy New Year!

    Paolo


  • last edited
    last edited

    Hi,

    I've finally been able to make a version for the Synchron libraries (with Synchronized Woodwinds and VI Harps).

    Obviously, with second violins on the right! 😊

    Holst - Mercury (Synchron)

    Paolo


  • PaulP Paul moved this topic from Orchestration & Composition on
  • PaulP Paul moved this topic from Your Music on