@fahl5 said:

 

Hi Guy, Bacos yes I have listened to a lot recordings, but I do know the piece since decades pretty well since I have also played the piece myself while i was studying so I know quite well what I want to hear and I was not that enthusiastic with many of the existting conventional recordings I could listen. And to be honest the amount of "humanisation" was in most of the conventional recordings something what often enough was really annoying or more or less "the poblem". I do not talk about cconciously flexible shaped tempodetails which I programmed in this recoding as usual very detaild. But "humanisation" in term what conventional Interprets lack in respect to precision. No Bartok is neither a romantic characterpiece nor a Wagner opera oreover it is pretty near what we call in germany the "neue Sachlichkeit" from the late 30th. So if you hear something "sterile" great! Take a look an some pictures of "Christian Schad" you will see how "sterile" the "neue Sachlichkeit" in the 30th could have been. It is as every body know a very metric percussive piece not only for the Percussion but likewise for the Piano ( I always thought Corea and Hanckock wold have been presumably quite good interprets pehaps even better than Barenboim or other more strict classical pianists).

I'm not talking about humanizing like mushy Chopin rubato, you're really going extreme there, give me some credit 😊  A passage could be very rhythmic while not sounding mecanical, not that this is the case, but leans towards that and this makes it less musical in my opinion. I have a feeling this is because of too much editing, wanting to make each note perfect, this happens often in programming. I'm sure it has nothing to do with your playing skills. I'm just saying what I hear and I trust my ears, but if you're happy, just ignore my post. 

If you know the "Ballet Mechanique" written by Gearge Antheil a few Years befor Bartoks Sonata which has a very similar Instrumentation (Ballet pour Instruments Mécaniques et Percussion), you can perhaps imagine why "sounding mecanical" could be just what this music is about, and why Antheil already prefered to use playerpianos over "humanizing" conventional interprets. And yes even if you ever tried to play Bartoks Sonata for two pianos and Percussion yourself on the piano you will know that the slow movement has inevtiable an athmosphere of aseptique vacuum kind of the denial of any conventional kind of musical expression,It is a bit like a soundtrack to nihilism.

If you ever had the chance to listen one of the exsiting Recordings of Antheils Ballet Mecanique, you might perhaps understand, how the inability of most conventional players to provide the necessary precision might end up in a real interpretationproblem. Yes I am indeed quite happy that a sequencer could be precise whithout demonstrating again and again how difficult this is for human players. For romantic virtuos music I know that the inabilty to play exactly what is written is often an important part of its passionat musical intention (not only in Liszts but in many Virtuos music and I enjoy it very much to imitate those effects with a detailed programming of the timecurve) but here the opposite seems to me necessary (nevertheless the timecurve still follows the articulation of musical thoughts as it is musical necessary) But imho. The brilliance of the 20th century is to overcome the "romantic passion" of not being able to play precise.

Steff, I'll be direct here, and I don't mean to be rude, however, you can't keep on shoving aruments down people's throat to make them appreciate something or see things the way you do. This is "ART", pre-requisites to enjoy a work should not be necessary, and that's the message (some might say snobbish) you're constantly giving, it can help to better appreciate what the author is trying to convey and having knowledge of the endless litterature and history behind it + structure, form bla, bla, bla,, but not the pure pleasure of enjoying what you hear, and you definitely are conflicting both. Did you think Beethoven wrote music for just the elite? Absolutely not, everyone enjoys Beethoven, simply because it's enjoyable, no questions asked, no knowledge required and that's what music should be about.

Oh I do not have any reason for any concerns that others would not like what I do. And this s also true for my recent recording of Bartoks Sonata for two Pianos as I can see in predominant amount of the spontaneous reaction frrom users.

So I personnally actually have no need at all to argue anything if there are enough who simply enjoy what they hear. If you obviously do have some problems It is up to you. But if you ask me why I do something in a certain way and not another than I can frankly let you know the reason I do have.

BTW Do you seriously ask if I think that "Beethoven wrote music for just the elite? "

For sure, of course he does and by far more than perhaps anyone nowaday!

Just take a short look whom he dedicated all his works if you do have any doubts in the fact, that the Audience in Beethovens time was far from being "everyone". And even if they are today worldwide many more, be sure it is still far from being "everyone" in any sens of the word.

But did you seriously believe to have today a good explainable reasons in music for why and what I do something would be "snobbish" only "for the elite". Than I confess I am obviously a bit more optimistic about the intelleectual potential of those who are interested in classical music. 

However even if I do have thousands of concrete  proofs that many people simply enjoy what I do without any question or discussion at all. Serious classical music is nothing what in any way is in conflict with an open mind, reason and understanding and yes there are always many interesting things to learn and to know which are very helpful to consider in musical decisions at least of music in classical tradition. If you ever have had a decent musical education I am sure you would know what I am talking about.

I will not dispute if you might find your way to your own understanding of music without profound knowledge about and therefor hesitate to understand the inspiring potential of background knowledge. But this is actually nothing anyone has to be afraid for. If you like to discuss just do it but do not fear that you will get your answer.

If this not your way since you perhaps fear other opinions, no problem, no one forces you to participate in any discussion.

I’ve already made my point.

You just seem to be pretty cocksure of yourself and your advices given the fact, that I can not see any indication of any familiarity of you with the interpretation with classical modern Music like Bartok. Berg, Schönberg, Webern, Ligeti, Honegger, Prokoviev, Messiaen, Skriabin,  Nancarrow or likewise ambituos living Composers (of which you can find more than enough of well received examples on my site  - in numbers 680 mp3's just with music from the 20th century).

Regarding the fact, that I can not see any recording of any of those or likewise composers produced by yourself,  Isn't it simply the more propable, that this kind of music is just beyond the scope of your personal musical universe?

Never mind I will let you your personal limitations of understanding, but just take in account that it is simply more convincing to get advices from someone who have a practical and theoretical insight of what he talks.

For me at least is grumbling against precision, "elite", and deeper musical knowledge in general simply not enough to make interesting inspiring or at least in anyway convincing "friendly advices". Sorry for that, but I am just honest in that point. I think we both will learn to live with that difference.

This recording is instantly obvious as computer driven MIDI.  It is  obvious that it was generated digitally, not humanly. It is dead, and cannot be listened to beyond a few minutes.  It is a bad representation of great music and you should take it down. 

The fact you cling to this makes obvious - you have no idea of what you are doing, and yet try to put everyone here down as your inferior.  I am sick of your attitude. I have put up with your insults and arrogance for too long.  You are not superior to anyone here - even the most rank amateur.  You cannot even begin to match Guy's performances, let alone compositions.  You are not even a composer and strut around, acting superior to actual composers who create music.  Composers like ones you steal from on your website.  They didn't give you permission to do their work - they are dead!  What makes you think you can profit from their work?  That  also makes me disgusted.  You ought to shut the fuck up and listen to Guy and other people here - but you are so arrogant, you will never do anything except make your silly little point, and think you are right and anyone who argues is a fool.  You are actually near psychosis in your certainty of being correct.   

In answer to your stupid tagline - yes, "to be serious,"  there is a far greater resource - it is the VSL website.  It is also Guy Bacos' website.  And yet, in your little arrogant brain, quantity = quality.  In reality, quantity means nothing, and quality means everything.  Do you understand that? I doubt it.   You are incapable of it.  

btw - don't answer me  - I don't care what you think about anything. 

@fahl5 said:

You just seem to be pretty cocksure of yourself and your advices given the fact, that I can not see any indication of any familiarity of you with the interpretation with classical modern Music like Bartok. Berg, Schönberg, Webern, Ligeti, Honegger, Prokoviev, Messiaen, Skriabin,  Nancarrow or likewise ambituos living Composers (of which you can find more than enough of well received examples on my site  - in numbers 680 mp3's just with music from the 20th century).

Regarding the fact, that I can not see any recording of any of those or likewise composers produced by yourself,  Isn't it simply the more propable, that this kind of music is just beyond the scope of your personal musical universe?

Never mind I will let you your personal limitations of understanding, but just take in account that it is simply more convincing to get advices from someone who have a practical and theoretical insight of what he talks.

For me at least is grumbling against precision, "elite", and deeper musical knowledge in general simply not enough to make interesting inspiring or at least in anyway convincing "friendly advices". Sorry for that, but I am just honest in that point. I think we both will learn to live with that difference.

I would be embarrased of that post.

William I know how easy you get personal. And yes this is enough to be reported.

Be sure that by far the most of all living composers whose Works are presented on my site gave me their personal allowance, asked me to do their music worked with me together and show in opposite to you all very friendly reaction on what they have heard..

You do with this kinds of posting neither you nor Guy Bacos any favour.

@fahl5 said:

You just seem to be pretty cocksure of yourself and your advices given the fact, that I can not see any indication of any familiarity of you with the interpretation with classical modern Music like Bartok. Berg, Schönberg, Webern, Ligeti, Honegger, Prokoviev, Messiaen, Skriabin,  Nancarrow or likewise ambituos living Composers (of which you can find more than enough of well received examples on my site  - in numbers 680 mp3's just with music from the 20th century).

Regarding the fact, that I can not see any recording of any of those or likewise composers produced by yourself,  Isn't it simply the more propable, that this kind of music is just beyond the scope of your personal musical universe?

Never mind I will let you your personal limitations of understanding, but just take in account that it is simply more convincing to get advices from someone who have a practical and theoretical insight of what he talks.

For me at least is grumbling against precision, "elite", and deeper musical knowledge in general simply not enough to make interesting inspiring or at least in anyway convincing "friendly advices". Sorry for that, but I am just honest in that point. I think we both will learn to live with that difference.

I would be embarrased of that post.

Am I wrong in any single fact I mentioned?

I’ve already made my point.

Steffen, your personal insults to Guy Bacos should not be tolerated on this forum simply due to your own shortcomings and lack of willingness to accept honest, truthful feedback.   

I have had numerous discussions with Guy Bacos while he is preparing for his demos and I can assure you that he does extensive in-depth research and is most familiar with the body of works from a plethora of modern composers as this has often been the basis of our conversations and analysis.  Whether Bartok, Adams, Guibaidulina, Esa Pekka Salon, Ligeti, Prokofiev, Scriabin, or many others, I know Guy has listened and studied the scores of these modern composers as we have discuss their compositional techniques and orchestrations in detail.  It has simply been a subject of interest to us both to study and learn from existing works even if these discussions sometimes become rather exhaustive.

So Steffen, you are most wrong in your comment that Guy is unfamiliar with such modern pieces.  Making assumptions and accusations such as this debases you more than anyone when you are so wrong.

@synergy543 said:

Steffen, your personal insults to Guy Bacos should not be tolerated on this forum simply due to your own shortcomings and lack of willingness to accept honest, truthful feedback.   

I have had numerous discussions with Guy Bacos while he is preparing for his demos and I can assure you that he does extensive in-depth research and is most familiar with the body of works from a plethora of modern composers as this has often been the basis of our conversations and analysis.  Whether Bartok, Adams, Guibaidulina, Esa Pekka Salon, Ligeti, Prokofiev, Scriabin, or many others, I know Guy has listened and studied the scores of these modern composers as we have discuss their compositional techniques and orchestrations in detail.  It has simply been a subject of interest to us both to study and learn from existing works even if these discussions sometimes become rather exhaustive.

So Steffen, you are most wrong in your comment that Guy is unfamiliar with such modern pieces.  Making assumptions and accusations such as this debases you more than anyone when you are so wrong.

Sorry there is no "insult" at all.

Stay with the facts: Just take a look on the approximately 340 recordings with VSL-Samples I can find.

Simply none of them show any attempt of an interpretation of any music by the named composers. To state, that this gives no indication at all, that Guy might has any practical expierience in programming music by any of the named composers is no "insult" but simply a matter of fact.

We Guy and me are both working a pretty similar time with the same library and after having produced myself nearly 3000 predominantly very friendly received sample based recordings with among them nearly 700 of composers like the named serious 20th century classical modernism I can see absolutly no reasoon why I should not be honest when it comes to say what convinces me and what does not.

Is it so difficult  to accept, that Guys interest in using Samples has obviously a likewise very different character as our both musical education has. I confess I never have "worked as the house pianists in different places, among them was the prestigious "Club Saint Denis" of Montreal." And honestly I even never had any interesst or ambition to do so, but followed completly different challenges.

But if Guy love this kind of music as it seems to be, - why not? This no problem at all for me. But is it so difficult to accept that this is not necessary the appropriate precondition to play in any way the predominant judge for what I do. No one should or would expect that from a inhouse Pianist who can play the Chopin-Studies. But If one nevetheless tries to one should be at least ready that there are more possible answers than Guy is obviously ready to accept. And yes a decent musical knowledge and ability to give reasons based on historic arguments is also what he should be ready to come allong with and not ignore it simply with terms like "resistance" or even more abusive wording against me. 

An "advice" which is not allowed to discuss without being insulted for something like being not  obediente enough is neither friendly nor in anyway an advice but imho simply naive. Sorry. but discussion like that will scarcly convince me in any way at all.

By the way I do not have the impression that Guy has on his side ever been in anyway ready to serious reflect the friendly hints I gave him , but prefered exactly that behavior a few people here believe one might insult me for.

It is not about what any one has just "talked" once about anything, but an in depth knowledge and practical expiereince. Many important aspects of seious classical modernism of the 20th century look very different if ever you have spent the work to be able to play the music and do have an notable expierience in realising that music not only once ot twice. Just show me your interpretation of Bsrtoks Sonata for two Piaanos and Percussion and we can fairly judge who is able to convince for musical reasons. Up to now I cant hear anything like this. 

So come back to reality. I will not dispute or reduce in any way Guy Penchant to very popular titles of the standard repertoire and self composed genre pieces inspired or not by bajuvarian Brassbands or Christmas Carols. This is what he likes so why should he not do so. 

But sorry if anyone seriously believe that would or even could in any way be any kind of Benchmark for what I do.... frankly but this is really completly inapropriate in any way.

I’ve already made my point.

I’ve already made my point.

@Another User said:

So I would advise you to write a disclaimer:

I will only welcome comments by people who are as knowledgeable as Steff in contemporary music.

Of course this is again wrong and insultive.

I will of course not place any disclaimer just to remind you that any 2 cent you say might get its answer, without you instantly must complain "resitence"

You might perhaps follow my example when I tried to give you a friendly hint on a piece you meant to be inspired by Bajuvarian Music.

My attitude was: it finally depends on what you as the programmer/composer intend to do and I can only let you know my personal spontaneous reaction, being open for all what you think about.

Just try to take your Ideas and impression  ("2cents") as your personal idea: A friend would not complain resistence as soon he gets an answer on his thougts, but would ask first, what someone intends to do, before trying to give advice to help to achieve this intention.  (Just my 2 cents about wordings like "friendly advice")

I’ve already made my point.

Ok that seem to be a bit strong "resistence" for the simple friendly advice just to take your 2 cent not for the last possible word.

What ever makes it so difficult to you just to follow my example and start in your thoughts about other with the posibility that others do also have their point of view which would - at least when ever a real friend would try to give an advice - be the best starting point of any consideration.

Just try keep yourself open for an answer even if you at least here seem to have obviously some severe problems with that.

I’ve already made my point.

I've already made my point.