It seems to me VSL had a difficult but obvious choice because they could have kept to the letter of their original agreement and not invested in and developed VI. Their obligation was limited to the original formats of Giga and EXS. So they could have made everyone happy by staying with those formats with their upgrade paths. VI is a choice in favor of their customers because they can now access twice the number of samples on their platforms and make use of all the articulations we either don't or can't use (due to time or memory limitations or even difficulty in using the performance tool with repititions and such.)

They have streamlined and optimized are original investment potential but this was a big time and money investment for them. It may appear unfair or a change in original promises but the promise of a great library that would grow and improve has been very well kept and exceeded.

These things cost money as we all know so we deal with this reality. But we can all enter a new reality in our music making that we wouldn't have if we merely upgraded and didn't pay for the same sample twice. I would rather play twice as many samples per midi channel than not pay for them. Except it's not twice as many it's exponentially beyond.

So I'll pay twice and hear ten times more: creativity wins the day. How often does that happen?

Herb & CM,


Thanx for clarifying the sample figures and removing the '800 000' from the Standard Cube page/column.

It seems to me that the Symphonic Cube Instruments page has been updated/corrected since I checked the number of total samples (Yesterday).

You did change that didn't you?

It's good that it's now not misleading anymore (I could swear there really was a 800 000 samples written down on the standard cube column) and it certainly helps us now to better understand CM's post about the Standard Cube not being considered as a 'Larger Library' by VSL - Which didn't make any sense to me when I checked the facts to see where you were going CM.

So I will very much agree to the fact that 'technically' speaking your initial VIP statement has been respected - if that's how it was initially formulated.
What a shame though that you won't take into account the new samples and give us a VIP upgrade path...

@herb said:

800000 samples is the amount of the full version.

Fact is that you would miss around 200000 of samples you already own with the Pro Edition.
That's why the Standard Edition makes really no sense for Pro Edition users, because they have to use their EXS/Giga Pro Edition versions simultaneous with the Vienna Instruments to get access to all their samples.

best
Herb

Okay I think this is the core issue. Plase let me tell you why I think you're wrong on this.
The standard edition may seem to you like it makes really no sense for pro edition users... But seriously, do you think they'll buy that?
I'll give you three simple reasons that anyone will argue makes the standard edition appealing.

- We're not missing on the 200 000 samples we already own because we already own theme and can use them with exs/giga etc. (the old way).

-We'd benefit from the VI features without having to pay for the extended versions (just like new users)

- I don't think anyone would accept that a solution doesn't make sense because another available one is better (in this case "The full Cube edition")

In a sense you're telling us " The standard Cube is to the full Cube what Opus was to the First-edition. " There was no path to Opus from the first edition (If I recall well) Am I understanding this correctly?

If so. Ultimately what is preventing you from making an adapted VIP path to the Standard Edition? A path that would take into account the VI engine, the redundant samples and the shiping DVD's?

Is it...

- The original phrasing of the VIP path doesn't permit you to do it?
- You've mentionned the distributor thing.. I don't see how this was really blocking you from doing so.. as long as they get their share of the deal.
- The fact you don't want to offer loyal users the possibility to decide not to go for the extended version? Which would actually make sense for some of us.

The latest is the one I find the most disturbing... Fistly because you're not really giving us the choice, and also because you're offering new users an alternative that you're not offering earlier users like me...

In the End Herb, if you really think the Standard Edition doesn't make sense for Pro- Edition users, why don't you give these users a VIP upgrade path that maybe they'll decide they want even though obviously you think they will not buy it?
How about checking if your theory matches reality?


It's good that you guys are saying you're in a confortable position to defend the pricing policy... I still believe it's a courageous mission.
There's an expression in my country called "walking on eggs"...

You know what... I really hope your product is a killer ap and that there will be less ambiguity on the quality of the product than on the true intent of the pricing policy (VIP upgrade on Extended only).

No, I don't think it's for the sake of the existing clients that you're offering the upgrade path that way round Herb.

I believe my impressions are shared by many.

Pointing to details in the original 'VIP policy 'statement may give you good conscience and help you justify what you need to justify but it won't change people's impressions and belief about how you decided to handle the earlier adopters in the process of your business making..

That's it from me.

Good luck anyway !!

charl, you are right - i've removed the 800.000 from the standard column because i had to realize this is again misleading. same with DVDs - the fact that all samples come already on the DVDs if you purchase standard does not mean they are licensed, although you will get a 30-day demo mode to check out if the extended librariy would fit your needs.

@Another User said:

The standard Cube is to the full Cube what Opus was to the First-edition

the statement should read: the standard cube is to the full cube what opus is to the pro edition (opus is the *essentials* of the pro)

therefore there was never an upgrade path from opus to the first or from first to opus, but there was a path from opus to the pro.
in this sense there is now a path from the pro to the SC full (also from opus of course)

the situation from pro to SC standard is now similar: all content of SC std is in SC full, but not all content from pro is in SC standard, therefore the latter is no upgrade path (as an other example: there is no upgrade path from logic 6 pro to logic 7 express)

i have to admit it might make sense for some users to use SC standard beneath the pro as it made for some first edition users to get opus (btw the most difficult case to calculate discounts), but unfortunatele this is nothing we could offer a discount for.

christian

Hi CM

For added clairity I suggest you write (Standard+Extended) below the text which says "Full Library". It could sound like its a third product if people haven't paid enough attention [:)]

@dpcon said:

It seems to me VSL had a difficult but obvious choice because they could have kept to the letter of their original agreement and not invested in and developed VI. Their obligation was limited to the original formats of Giga and EXS. So they could have made everyone happy by staying with those formats with their upgrade paths. VI is a choice in favor of their customers because they can now access twice the number of samples on there platforms and make use of all the articulations we either don't or can't use (due to time or memory limitations or even difficulty in using the performance tool with repititions and such.)

They have streamlined and optimized are original investment potential but this was a big time and money investment for them. It may [i]appear[/i] unfair or a change in original promises but the promise of a great library that would grow and improve has been very well kept and exceeded.

These things cost money as we all know so we deal with this reality. But we can all enter a new reality in our music making that we wouldn't have if we merely upgraded and didn't pay for the same sample twice. I would rather [i]play[/i] twice as many samples per midi channel than not pay for them. Except it's not twice as many it's exponentially beyond.

So I'll pay twice and hear ten times more: creativity wins the day. How often does that happen?

dave, while many of these statements ring true, they are far from universal. many people aren't happy precisely because the opposite of what you have said holds equally true for them. not an elegant solution.

Martin,

I understand and am not putting anyone down who's not happy as being squarely in the wrong or VSL squarely in the right. One could argue that the VSL original agreement has been finessed quite a bit. My point is just that there is cost saving potential (time and quality improvements) and even greater creative potential, so I'm not shocked that it's going to cost me. Someone's has to pay for this new creature and it's going to be us. Could VSL knock a little off more off our bottom line? Maybe that's the core issue I don't know.

I found your post to be reasoned and legitimate and would prefer the outcome you desire but I'm not surprised by business needs of VSL. It seems I'm always paying for things that don't mean a lot to me so at least in this case I will enjoy myself after initial wincing.

I just got off a really enjoyable call with a forum member here. In passing he referred to something I wrote in this thread as being a threat. I didn’t take his comment as being critical at all, but it got me thinking about the wonderful opportunities we have to share ideas across international boundaries. Now our native language is both English but still there was something that didn’t quite translate between what I intended to say and what I said. So I can’t imagine how it might have been interpreted across language barriers as we all work to understand each other. So for the record:

Although I have been critical of VSL and don’t agree with their approach to the SC, I told my friend that I thought the VIs would suit his needs better than the pro edition even where the reverse is true for me. My reference to 24-bit samples as being an unfulfilled contractual obligation was not meant to be a threat in any way. It is a harsh statement because unimpassioned analysis makes it that way: pro edition users have been promised 24-bit samples as a part of their purchase but have not received them. The fact is I don’t want them, and it would be incorrect to read my statement as having any interest in holding VSL responsible legally. Personally, I think VSL has a history of making promises it can’t keep only to find out later why (also a harsh statement). And while there might be a better way to go about this, at no point in time have I ever thought they were unethical. If anything, Herb has made sure that if they blow it, they make it right which to me is a sign of mature ethical thinking. I’m still disturbed that the SC leaves users who can’t or won’t upgrade hanging, but I’d like to think that VSL still recognizes their responsibility to these people and their potential for future VSL income. In the meantime, I’ll probably buy a couple of non-orchestral things like saxophones II and maybe a couple horizon things, and wait to see what they do next. This is a market that kills businesses that sit on their hands and my guess is we haven’t heard the last from VSL. For those who read my comments, please accept that they were meant to be constructive in adding clarity in crisis, and my ironic apology for not being clearer.

Hello all - I started this thread because I believed VSL would at least own up to the "tweaking" of their VIP program promise. In good faith, like many others I thought that my investment was well made. What I have is good - but I have decided upon reflection after further comments from the moderator and owner to not purchase any further products from VSL. No matter how they try and re-word the VIP program - it states that we will never have to pay twice for ANY sample. It's in black and white. I no longer care if it's 24bit - I no longer care about the money VSL spent developing the VI tool. If a company makes a statement - like within 30days you can have your money back - no questions asked - and then says, "well what we actually meant by that was..." then people will no longer buy from them. CM, Herb - you've lost a customer - and if you were politicians, you'd know what that really meant.

There are so many great sample librarys out there, it is simply unreal, but VSL still holds true, after doing alot of listening.

@simongentry said:

CM, Herb - you've lost a customer - and if you were politicians, you'd know what that really meant.

So they lose a customer - and what have you gained?
VI is clearly going to be a superior product to anything they (or anyone else, for all I know) have ever produced. You talk about politics, but you obvioiusly don't know the first thing about business. I can't help but think the loss in the long run is yours; if they are about to lose a few customers now, that is tragic, but with VI it stands to reason that they are more likely to attract many new customers (here's one, to start with) to more than make up for the loss of a few. I'm amazed and impressed by the response from the VSL team and the way they are accepting the feedback from their customers - even before the product is released! - how many companies have you dealt with that offer this kind of instant service and communication? I think you're making a big mistake to walk a way now.

This discussion is somewhat similar to the reaction to the new $8,500 Korg Oasys synth. Many loyal Korg customers were very angry about the pricing of the new synth, in that it was so expensive and loyal Korg customers had already invested so much in Korg products. However, the Oasys is far beyond any other synth available (I own one) and, although the market for it will be more limited than for other Korg synths, its pricing is worth it (IMO)

I think that same will likely prove to be true for the SC VI. There will be nothing available to compare to what it can do.

The VIP pricing program is based on the philosophy of not having to pay for the same samples twice. It seems to me that there is nothing in the new expanded SC that was in previous VSL offerings (24 bit vs 16 bit, VI with incredible intelligence built in, new articulations). Previous VSL customers can buy the expanded SC at a considerable savings compared to new customers. Yes, it is still expensive; yes many will not be able to afford it all at once (or at all), but I don't know what more VSL customers expect.

The new SC is not an incremental upgrade to existing technology. It appears to be a state-of-the-art application of sample-based technology with absolutely no compromise made in its design. The R&D investment for these products must have been tremendous. The work to develop this had to have been a labor of love for the VSL team, but that notwithstanding, they are still entitled to receive remuneration for that effort.

Even if you can't afford the SC (I am in that group, at least for now), how lucky the music world is to have a group of people with the passion and the ability to create a product like this.