Gee, I guess Digi gave you an extra free audio interface for that second computer to make it work then since Pro Tools is dongled by one of their many hardware interfaces.

Good deal.

Herb,

How is that going to work exactly? If we have one license per product, won't it be impossible to have a strings on separate computers?

Thanks,

Kevin

You get a license for each collection. So you could use the solo strings on computer 1, chamber strings on computer 2, orchestral strings I (violins/violas) on computer 3, and orchestral strings II (cello, basses) on computer 4.

best
Herb

Thanks Herb,

I understood that we could license each separate product on different dongles, but I thought you were implying from the last quote:

"The only restriction is, that you can't use a certain instrument, for example the solocello simultaneous on two different computers at the same time."

that we could authorize say, Orchestral strings on both computers, and then only use one instrument at a time.

In any case, for you, what is the ideal computer setup for the
Vienna instruments?

Best,

Kevin[/quote]

@herb said:

You get a license for each collection. So you could use the solo strings on computer 1, chamber strings on computer 2, orchestral strings I (violins/violas) on computer 3, and orchestral strings II (cello, basses) on computer 4.

best
Herb

Herb, without being argumentative, I'm honestly curious.

Wha† is the rationale behind not allowing users the full install on two computers?

Thanks
Tom

You can split differents instruments/collection on different dongles.
But if it is possible to copy the same instruments on different dongles, than the dongle would loose his sense.

best
Herb

@herb said:

You get a license for each collection. So you could use the solo strings on computer 1, chamber strings on computer 2, orchestral strings I (violins/violas) on computer 3, and orchestral strings II (cello, basses) on computer 4.

best
Herb

Thanks Herb,

I understood that we could license each separate product on different dongles, but I thought you were implying from the last quote:

"The only restriction is, that you can't use a certain instrument, for example the solocello simultaneous on two different computers at the same time."

that we could authorize say, Orchestral strings on both computers, and then only use one instrument at a time.

In any case, for you, what is the ideal computer setup for the
Vienna instruments?

Best,

Kevin

@tom@aerovons.com said:

Herb, without being argumentative, I'm honestly curious.

Wha† is the rationale behind not allowing users the full install on two computers?

I would also imagine that the policy is also intended to prevent a single VSL license from being shared and used by multiple people who should be buying their own copy of the library.

It's a bit of a drawback for me. I've got a Mac G5, using a PT rig with Logic as the front end, and then I have four additional PCs for running samplers and VIs. Some days, I'm doing simpler things, and I don't need to fire up the additional PCs. Currently, I have my first edition VSL library on my PCs, and my pro edition on my Mac. Ideally, I'd like to be able to install the complete library on my Mac, and then split up the various sections individually on my four PCs, and be able to have that all run simultaneously. Unfortunately, I'm not going to be able to do that. It's too bad there is no system to allow the utmost in installation flexibility for working on multiple computers locally. If there was, however, I'm sure there would be facilities with multiple producers who would attempt to share one library while simultaneously working on different projects. If everybody in the world was honest, we wouldn't have to hassle with any of this nonsense. Unfortunately, everyone in the world is not honest.

Lee Blaske

Lee, yes, you're right, I guess it comes down to that.

I don't have a huge system like yours...just one PC running all the VSL stuff and the Mac running some VI's and Pro Tools. I'd like to have the whole library on both computers just so I don't have to keep remembering where everything is, but I if I split it up I suppose I'll get used to it.

Anyway, can't wait for January[;)]

TH

@Lee Blaske said:

It's a bit of a drawback for me. I've got a Mac G5, using a PT rig with Logic as the front end, and then I have four additional PCs for running samplers and VIs. Some days, I'm doing simpler things, and I don't need to fire up the additional PCs. Currently, I have my first edition VSL library on my PCs, and my pro edition on my Mac. Ideally, I'd like to be able to install the complete library on my Mac, and then split up the various sections individually on my four PCs, and be able to have that all run simultaneously.
Lee Blaske

Lee, I'm probably being thick, but couldn't you install all the SC on your Mac anyway? Then when you don't need to fire up the PCs all you would have to do is put the relevant dongles in a USB hub and you could use all of it on your Mac. Obviously you still couldn't use two instruments at the same time on two different computers.

DG

@tom@aerovons.com said:

Herb, without being argumentative, I'm honestly curious.

Wha† is the rationale behind not allowing users the full install on two computers?

I would also imagine that the policy is also intended to prevent a single VSL license from being shared and used by multiple people who should be buying their own copy of the library.

It's a bit of a drawback for me. I've got a Mac G5, using a PT rig with Logic as the front end, and then I have four additional PCs for running samplers and VIs. Some days, I'm doing simpler things, and I don't need to fire up the additional PCs. Currently, I have my first edition VSL library on my PCs, and my pro edition on my Mac. Ideally, I'd like to be able to install the complete library on my Mac, and then split up the various sections individually on my four PCs, and be able to have that all run simultaneously. Unfortunately, I'm not going to be able to do that. It's too bad there is no system to allow the utmost in installation flexibility for working on multiple computers locally. If there was, however, I'm sure there would be facilities with multiple producers who would attempt to share one library while simultaneously working on different projects. If everybody in the world was honest, we wouldn't have to hassle with any of this nonsense. Unfortunately, everyone in the world is not honest.

Lee Blaske


It would be ideal if there could be some sort of deal for additional licenses once you have made the major investment.

Kevin

@KMC said:

It would be ideal if there could be some sort of deal for additional licenses once you have made the major investment.

Kevin

I agree that a site licence of some sort ought to be possible.

DG