@Dietz said:
Why are you dissing other forum-members ...? ;-]
/Dietz
Who's dissing whom? Aren't we taking about recognisable compositional traits in film composers?
DG
195,457 users have contributed to 42,987 threads and 258,257 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 16 new post(s) and 40 new user(s).
@DG said:
Hans Zimmer; 3 chords, boring orchestration, 80s analogue synth sound, yaaaaaaaaaaaawn......
DG
@DG said:
Hans Zimmer; 3 chords, boring orchestration, 80s analogue synth sound, yaaaaaaaaaaaawn......
DG
@PaulR said:
The question is 'can you instantly recognize a film score writer when hearing a piece of music that you have not heard before?'
Doesn't necessarily matter if you like the composer's music or not.
@William said:
John Barry - the combination of great, extended melody-writing and a simple yet strong orchestration, with a lot of use of short motifs somewhat similar to Herrmann
Ennio Morricone (Has signature cues he writes in every film that match other films in structure)
Evan Evans (has distinctive use of polytonality and solid orchestration) [[;)]]
I agree that the Danube was appropriate not inappropriate, BUT just because Alex North wrote a nice score doesn't mean it was a good one. I fully support Kubrick's decision NOT to have original music. The film works best that way. It transcends the medium better than typical methods.@William said:
I think that the Blue Danube was oddly appropriate in "2001" but Alex North's rejected score was a thousand times better.