evan, please explain the reflexive *it's* - hopefully i don't have to understand it as i understood (.... you know, my clumsy english ...)
christian
christian
and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.
190,655 users have contributed to 42,759 threads and 257,211 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 11 new post(s) and 43 new user(s).
@cm said:
evan, please explain the reflexive *it's* - hopefully i don't have to understand it as i understood (.... you know, my clumsy english ...)
christian
@cm said:
evan, please explain the reflexive *it's* - hopefully i don't have to understand it as i understood (.... you know, my clumsy english ...)
christian
Great point! Just because you are downloading an app on a P2P based system doesn't mean you are illegally using the software. That is somethign I said before.
Evan Evans
I understand your point, but do NOT agree.Try not to be so quick to jump to conclusions. Einstein worked his whole life trying to prove certian theories. He never concluded anything. Some of his theories were later able to be tested and concluded using the scientific method. But he never PRESUMED to have CONCLUSIVE results unless he did!
Colin
. . . The price was fair and it was a major update. Miroslav Vitous, on the other hand -(which I would probably like to buy too) is an example of a great library which needs a price drop and a reworking IMHO. Dan Dean is very cool, takes care of his customers. Steinberg don't endear themselves to me - The Grand will probably never appear as Audio Unit! VSL are tops in support, and their prices are (mostly) very fair I think . . .
@mike connelly said:
I still don't quite get it. Why would someone that owns Vision need to download a copy?
Here's a different point of view by Brad Wardell of Stardock and Galactic Civilizations fame. As a game developer and publisher himself he has some insight into the business and he comes up with a very different conclusion:@Galleddrim said:
Commercial piracy is a vicious cycle. Pros rip off software because it's "too expensive," developers raise the price tag because they are losing money to pirates, and the pirates feel more justified in ripping of the developers, who will raise prices . . . etc. The developers are not doing anything wrong here. They are simply responding to the demands of a glitch in the free market and attempting to remain in business. This is why new PC games are running at $60 right now when they were $40 only a couple years ago. It is piracy-driven inflation.
A record producer I worked with - liked working with a lot actually - impressed me the most when, asked how we wre going to deal with a certain problem, said: "I'm not sure (yet)".Yeah, there'sa lot of confidence in that. It means, he is "like water" as Bruce Lee said. Able to form and change into whatever condition is currently applicable.