thanks chaps - you're too kind [:)]
Ian
Ian
201,697 users have contributed to 43,256 threads and 259,321 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 6 new post(s) and 61 new user(s).
Evan - no it was done by a guy called Ian Aspinal at www.thelosthighway.netIt's really great. Glad to hear this guys hireable. Maybe I'll drop him a line.
One nice Horn effect that would be nice to have are the pitch bends that naturally occur when the player slowly stops/unstops the horn. It sounds great because the timbre changes with the pitch. Goldsmith used this in his score for The Mummy, for example (in this case the effect was fortissimo played with the whole section - very sinister sounding.)You can hear EXTENSIVE use of this effect in my classical brass Quartet "Suppression" here:
Guess I didn't understand that. That's really nice of you to offer all that to just one person. What if he wants to share it?@cm said:
just to mention ... did you read the text right saying *the winner of the _personal_ sampling session* ... although the resulting samples/instrument might be included in a further edition, they will be dedicated and made personally for the winner, means not intended to be released as a public extension to existing modules
christian
Good point. But treating customers like criminals is never good policy I think. Look to Steve Jobs as an example of success based on treating customers as customers not criminals.@cm said:
hmm - supposing mr. z offers you some sampled instruments made by and for himself for your personal use, because let's say you are a good friend - are you entitled to share them? the rest is tbd - and i think the *d* does not mean discussed [;)]
christian
But treating customers like criminals is never good policy I think. Look to Steve Jobs as an example of success based on treating customers as customers not criminals.
Haha. No. It's just maybe I misunderstood but it sounds like CM was saying something to the effect of if IAN shares the samples with another person, it will be without an attached license, and what happens if that person shares them with someone else? At that point without a license there'd be nothing prohibiting rampant legal distribution of the sounds.@peter0302 said:
Treating customers like criminals???
(he must have forgotten his medication - just when I thought it was working :wink[:)]
If you don't get it, try reading up on Steve Jobs. An excellent example of someone who tries to treat customers like customers, and let's the law do it's duty in weeding out criminals shoul dit be necesssary.Apple's lawyers are no slouches, and know how to be aggressive without necessarily appearing so. If you can show me where the user agreements to which Steve Jobs' customers must assent are substantially more trusting of the customer (in a legally meaningful way) than those of other software companies, then I'll see what you mean.