Final thoughts on VSL before writing a review... MERGE IN!

[Roman Beilharz]

Hi there,

I'd like to share some of my thoughts and invite you all to change my mind regarding one or the other thing I don't get yet, before I will sit down and write my VSL-review for PC & Musik (First Edition package including Performance Set).

First of all, I like to thank the whole team for obviously endless effort, very high musical and technical professionality, great creativity in finding new solutions for orchestral sampling and a passionate way to improve your product. And this forum here with loving support.

I consider the VSL legato-approach to be the most convincing thing that has ever been invited to allow a keyboard-player to tie or gliss notes. No doubt. It works fantastic. Being able to play these performance-legatos dynamically will be a matter of "tech and time", I guess.
Q1: Herb, is it true that the missing basic-dynamics of all first-edition instruments will be made available to all VIP-users?

I am sorry if I missed something during the last week, but I have been ill. Forgive me, if it has already been covered:
Q2: I miss vibrato sustains - at least for the woodwinds. Will there be free vibrato-patches as an update for First Edition users?

The repetition-tool seems an interesting tool to experiment with, but I don't really understand it's point. I would much more prefer to have a tool, that would just randomly change single samples/notes, so that I was able to play convincing repetitions without having to count notes etc.. Imagine kind of a VAR-concept as we have in GOS just for any instrument: slight changes in tune, brightness and a pool of 4 samples per tone and dynamic-layer were just fine. If we even included both chromatic neighbors shifted +1/-1, we even had a pool of 12 samples for each note, that we could map and automate in a way, that there was no chance to hear a cycle while repeating notes anymore. And we kept the sample pool effectively small.

Q3: Who else thinks this is a strange tool to have? Who loves it and why? Did I miss something?
Q4: Is anyone REALLY using this tool for composing/arranging? How?

I am much too lazy in production to pick the right dynamic variant (fpf, sfz,<>, ><[;)], timestretch it in case it doesn't fit the tempo, build new variants etc.. I would prefer having again GOS-like multi-layer-crossfade-patches ("EXP" or at SAM-Horns "MW") to be able to really play my own dynamic bows with the mod.-wheel. I know a fp sounds odd that way, but at least slower motions can be created very convincingly with such edited and dynamically layered sustain patches.

Q5: Does anyone use these dynamic-samples a lot and likes to convince me, that they are the better solution?
Q6: Will there be multi-layer-crossfade-patches for sustained notes as an future VSL update?

I thank you all very much for participating in this, so that I will hopefully be able to judge this great library in a more objective way...

Roman Beilharz

[herb]

Hello Roman,
some comments, maybe they are helpful for you.

Q1: Herb, is it true that the missing basic-dynamics of all first-edition instruments will be made available to all VIP-users?

We discussed it with our distributors in Frankfurt and all agreed that we will offer a free update for all those who won't (or can't) upgrade.
It's not a final list, but I would offer the following gigs:
Trumpet ensemble performance legato forte
Trombone ensemble performance legato forte
Double basses performance legato range extension (plus one octave)
Violin performance legato range extension (plus one octave)
String tremolo sustains looped
Oboe sustained vibrato
Trumpet ensemble marcato sustain
and some goodies and surpises.

all in all up to 3 gigabyte completely new recorded sample stuff for free

Performance repetitions:

my aproach is, that here you get real played repetition samples,
the difference between the first (starting note) and following notes are in most cases dramitcally (IMO)

By the way, you can use this tool in a complete random mode, if you activate chain mode and setup an individual matrix.

You even could play the repetition line revers if you setup it this way in chain mode:

0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
0:0:0:0:0:0:1:0
0:0:0:0:0:1:0:0
0:0:0:0:1:0:0:0
0:0:0:1:0:0:0:0
0:0:1:0:0:0:0:0
0:1:0:0:0:0:0:0

An example: the Dvorak piece would be impossible without the repetition tool. The strings playing fast 16th double notes. Here I didn't count samples, I simply played through the whole passage and simply switched off the starting note. What I mean is, that you can mostly stay in the repetition tool even if you are playing intervall steps.

Dynamic Samples:
I often use the follwing technique to get every length out of a dynamic sample: I create a dedicated release sample miditrack for an instrument and place release samples if I need the dynamic samples shorter.
We want to offer a release sample tool in the future (for automation), where you can adjust the volume of the release sample during playing. This is the only way to get the right transition in connection with a dynamic sample.
Another option could be, that you can choose different release samples to get different phrasings at the end. (a Maarten Spruijt suggestion)

Q6: Will there be multi-layer-crossfade-patches for sustained notes as an future VSL update?

All ensemble instruments have multi layer-crossfade mappings.
You find them in the long notes gigs.
For solo instruments these programmings are not available for well known reasons.

Finally, we have many more ideas for further developments. You will get more possibilities, more flexibility and usabilty in the future. It's just a first step and we need a little more flexibilty out of the different sampling systems - but it seems that the developers now take notice of us [[;)]]

best wishes
Herb

[NG1]

Herb answered this better than I could, but I'll chime on on the repetition and dynamics questions from the standpoint of a composer currently using these tools in commercial music production.

The repetition tool is indispensible for pieces that have lots of moving notes - remember that you don't have to repeat only one note, you can move up or down the scale freely. I find repetition mode to be infinitely prefereable to the alternating sample approach. And the repetition dynamics can make for very convincing lines that you could never pull of as well with just short notes sampled in a few velocities - I think the fact that the neighboring notes were all recorded at the same time has something to contribute to this. Occasionaly I have problems with the timing not lining up like it seems like it should in the sequencer (it's often late and I have to compensate) but this may be user error.

The 'dynamics' samples are also very important I think. Almost as much as the legato tool, in fact. I've done pieces that have used only dynamic samples and a few .3s and .5s sustains. It resulted in the pieces being more "alive" than many of the others that I've done. I like my lines to constantly have direction - after using the 'dynamics', the normal sustains sound stale by comparison. Also, I've never been a fan of the mod-wheel with multiple velocity layers approach - I can never get it to sound as natural as I would like. I'm really hoping future editions will fill out the dynamic samples that are missing with some instruments - I'd like all the instruments to have as many variants as the horn does.

Hope that helps.
-sla

[Iwan Roth]

It’s very nice to have this thread, so I do not have to write “5 weeks of VSL" [:D]

I agree Herb, you did answer the Q very well and, now after knowing the VSL team somewhat better due to the many readings on the forum, I am sure that this people are not only after fast money. VSL will probably do the same as Garritan did, and give us as much as they can, for our money.

Performance Tool: Until very recently I also -like Roman- could not really see the point in the Repetition Tool, but I slowly start to understand. This is a new way to do things. For Herb this is of course no problem, because he is the inventor. For normal users it takes more time. I take for me about 1 year to be able to use Garritan to the - more ore less - full potential, so this will be the same for VSL. I think that a library which you can get out of the box and after 1 hour know all about it, can not be good.

@Another User said:

Q5: Does anyone use these dynamic-samples a lot and likes to convince me, that they are the better solution?

YES, I DO! This is one of the most important things about learning the library. Knowing every articulation and dynamic of every patch and being able to look at a score and knowing which one to use. When I really do know a library I do not even try out, I directly write the patch number to use in the score.

Herb did answer about the cross fade. I think many of us do not notice these patches because of there name "dynamic layers" which can be misleading. More layers would be nice [[;)]]

Personally, I do not agree with some posts on the forum who advocate using many libraries. Since I only produce one stile of music, I would like to have one and the only library, as a conductor who conducts the same orchestra all the time. As a composer of contemporary music I miss some FX in all instruments. String clusters, glissandi’s - woodwind mouthpiece, wind FX etc. Garritan and Siedlazcek have a good choice of them. But maybe this is also already planned or I did miss the info.

Thanks

Iwan

[Peter Alexander]

Hi, Roman!

I'm Peter Alexander. My wife Caroline and I wrote the Performance Tool manual as the software was in progress. I'm also the author of How MIDI Works 6th Edition, the Revised Rimsky-Korsakov's Principles of Orchestration, Counterpoint by Fux, and the late Henry Mancini's computer tech.

With this background, I'm going to address a few of the issues you raised.

Having worked with Hank and other Hollywood composers, there are basically two approaches for learning any sample library. These are summarized in the words NOW and LATER.

NOW
This is often called the OUT-OF-BOX experience, meaning, what can I use right now that I can apply to my working situation that requires no thinking, contemplation, figuring out, etc. For example with Strings, we'd look for long bows, short bows, detaches, harmonics, pizz, trills and tremolos. In short, what we call in the USA, "meat & potato" instruments. In every sales demonstration done in my studio, every composer has focused FIRST in this area. The next issue is what mod wheel controlled instruments are available.

I agree with Iwan Roth, that it takes a year to learn a library. In Hollywood, we don't have a year. Time is money. Competition is intense (at least 8000 composers in LA competing for every music job). As such, how well the developer manages the composer's time via the learning curve is a critical sales component.

One of the most exciting NOW aspects of VSL is that there are indeed MANY now instruments ready to go, plus, as you've noted elsewhere, the Legato tool. For today in Hollywood, the Legato tool is the star of VSL.

LATER
This is the next group of instruments that have special features on them, that require review, instruction, and experimentation. Here, again, the "time is money" approach comes up, and what's required of any library, for the advanced features, is to manage the composer's time well by having clearly explained documentation with real world examples and potentially, sample setups. Anything that saves the composer time is critical.

Now, the other side of the NOW/LATER discussion are those composers, especially those on this forum who are also beta testers, who are technically driven, and immediately see how such tools as the Alternation Tool and Repetition tool should be used. However, this group is not the sales norm. The sales norm are those composers who are compositionally driven who use technology.

In reviewing your earlier questions, I would not consider that your approach is one of laziness. Your question/comments are very much in the sales norm for many composers. At the same time, however, you must allow that for an indepth library to be indepth, there must be features that require thought and experimentation, LATER.

I believe that VSL is well balanced because it has both the NOW and LATER caliber instruments. What does this mean for the PC and Musik reader?

For me, it means I have a library I can grow into and expand with. I can use much of it NOW, but that there's something more for LATER. Just knowing that means that the value of my investment in VSL grows daily!

UNDERSTANDING THE ALTERNATION AND PERFORMANCE TOOLS
Because I'm compositionally driven, my experience was yours once I got beyond the legato tool. And again, I draw from Iwan Roth's observation that Herb is the inventor, so who else knows it better? The challenge has been in taking something that's been in Herb's mind for a long time, and trying to explain in simple Hemingway-esque sentences that communicate ito a global purchasing base.

The first time through, we didn't really get it. But after a little experimentation, we saw the power first, of the Alternation tool, and the ability to set up patterns that saved hours of time of editing in the MIDI sequencer. The developmental task now is to make it really simple and organize a group of standard articulations that fit the "NOW" approach.

This is in progress.

The repetition tool was much more intense. But again, no less genius in application and use once we watched Herb use it (at NAMM). Once we had a few questions answered, we "got it."

So what does this say to the PC and Musik reader?

I think several things.

1) VSL sonically is ahead of every library on the market. Nothing compares.
2) With the Performance tool overall, you have one of the most conceptually innovative pieces of music software which enables the PC & Musik reader to create the most realistically sounding orchestra's EVER!

With this, Roman, keep in mind that the Performance Tool is version 1.0. Seeing what's capable today, imagine what will be capable with version 1.03 or even 1.1!

For the PC & Musik reader, the Performance tool has both DEPTH and matching samples! It's a system that all ties together.

As I 've said on Northern Sounds, VSL cannot be judged as you've judged sample libraries in the past. It is a wholly different approach in both concept and execution from anything else on the market, AND it is an ENTIRE orchestra. In computer terms, it is truely an integrated system. between orchestral sections and software enabling "human expression" at a never-before level.

Since your review is for PC & Musik and NOT Opera Monthly (!), that VSL is a true integrated software system for composing and advanced music production is a serious thing.

In its ads, Microsoft asks the question, "Where do you want to go today?"

That exact question can be posed by VSL to the PC & Musik reader, too. And the answer is, "Anywhere they want to go musically."

Cordially,

Peter Alexander
lacomposers@msn.com
peter@alexuniv.com
310-559-3779

[William]

I edited this post to be a slightly more substantive, though it is probably no longer needed. I agree that the only criticism about the VSL would be that it is a work in progress, in that the only things lacking are things that have not yet been completed, i.e. the vibrato oboe, some missing forte legato, etc. The cross-faded dynamic layer instruments are an essential way of getting a great deal of mileage out of very few separate files, when combined with the staccatos, and the legato tool is a unique invention in sound.

I also have not used the repetition tool much yet, as it is definitely not intuitively obvious, though it is an example of the subtlety of sound that this library excels in because of the difference - slight but noticeable - of rapidly alternated single note samples and multiple notes recorded while the instrument is still "vibrating" from the last note played. It would be possible to have five single note samples on the alternation tool, but the effect would be a "representation" of the effect, not the exact effects itself.

[Chris Luke]

Bravo Peter!

You're amazing man!

With Respect,

Chris

[Roman Beilharz]

Thanks a lot for contributing to this topic, everybody!

Let me just refer to some of your comments and react on some of them:

Q1/Q2:
I am glad to hear, that the First Edition will become a completely usable orchestra-library by adding the missing dynamics for the legatos. This update plan seems furthermore truly generous, considering the range extentions the marcato Trp and the (Yooouuu!! *jumping to the ceiling hitting my head in exitement*) VIBRATO OBOE!! Not to mention the goodies (I love goodies!). Great!

Q3/Q4:
Herb: thank you for your - as everytime - very interesting suggestions. Slaroussels: Good luck for your timing issues. Peter: you knocked yourself out! In fact appreciate every single comment over here very, very much. I wished I had been in Frankfurt last week to see the VSL demo at the Messe to learn more from Herb. Unfortunately I went ill all week [:(].
Regarding my questions: To be honest, I pretended to be a little more simple-minded than I really am. You know, to stir up the soup a little - and I dont regret it, you gave me wonderful material to think about. Yes, I didn't really dig into learning of the Rep-tool before, so my question was true, that I honestly liked to know how people use it. How could I know that Peter wrote the manual? I would have very conciously read it before asking stupid questions otherwise [:)]. And yes, I didn't like to see lots of figures on the screen to set up before I would be in the state of being able to play "just short notes". Of course I love the "out-of-the-box" thing. But on the other hand I am one of those "nifty-features-freaks" as well as you can see from my freaky Logic-environment for Garritan. The problem is, that I am a real-time- and an ergonomic-handling-freak. My highest goal in this game is to be able to increase real-time-music-access and decrease technical setup. That's why I personally try do program everything within Logic in a way, that I was able to just distribute everything in realtime: I can just play all dynamic-layers of the performance-legatos by auto-distribution to separate MIDI-channels and I use keyswitches to choose short notes and other articulations needed. This way I am able to nail down one line after the other hardly without editing. That's where I come from, this is where I like to go in the future. VSL works wonders in this discipline as well. But it can still be improved tremendously here.

I understand well, that all this is just the beginning of a wonderful friendship [[;)]]. Peter, you got me. Of course we are talking about 1.0. Great things are to come, no doubt about that. All needed seems there: ideas, competence, financial "breath", man-power...

So, although I get pretty OT now, I'd like to suggest to think about an "easy" mode/view for repetitions in the future. The first note and the last note of a repetition line for me seem to be the key to authenticity. If we managed repetitions in a way, that the first note of a repeated line of the same key was always a true first note, then followed by a random cycle of repeated notes (that would maybe differ in tune and brightness very slightly like the GOS VAR's) and for the last note we would e.g. tap the pedal. I know that this would not cover all that can be done with the "pro" mode/view that we have now, but the advatange was, that you didn't have to KNOW the number of notes you are going to play BEFORE you are playing them and you were able to cover a relatively large tempo-range (other than using the release trigger approach). I love to compose recording lines right out of my head. One more chance for the "out of the box"-flyby...

Q5:
Great. Slaroussels, very interesting to hear you using the dynamics heavily. Time for me to really dig into this adventure. Herb, it was perfect, if the Performance Tool will be able to handle additional release-samples (half-)automatically in the future. Great idea again. I know it will take months as it has taken me months to really PLAY the Garritans.

Q6:
Just as Iwan said: I feel a little ashamed, but I did not realize, that the "dynamic layers" are what I search for. Ooouch. More layers would contribute to make these layers more convincing, Iwan is right. And I still love those for completely free dynamic playing. Of course some movements simply do not work, but at least for the Garritan-Strings I can't live without them...

And Peter, thanks again for your great effort, ideas and enthusiasm to clarify things. Your conclusions are burnt into my cortex now [[;)]]. I finally agree with almost all you said. Nevertheless I find it interesting, that in some occasions other much more simple samples for my ears do a better job than the VSL, although they are lacking any flexibility. For me some of the Vitous woodwinds have a charm that I can't find anywhere else. But this depends on the condition, if you are composing for samples/production/final mixes or if you like to compose "as-if" for a real orchestra. Then nothing compares to VSL yet. No doubt about that.

All the best

Roman Beilharz

[KingIdiot]

Roman, I think you'll find that things will advance quite a bit in the future. Right now alot of the limitations in VSL is coming from Gigastudio itself. The Legato performances themselves are extensively programmed beyond "normal" giga limitations creating "mock dimensions". As giga opens in up 3.0 there will be alot more control features.

[Peter Alexander]

@Roman Beilharz said:

How could I know that Peter wrote the manual?

Actually, my wife Caroline wrote that section of it with excellent support from David Govett, Tom Hopkins and Ashley Witt, and of course, Herb's demo at NAMM.

"My highest goal in this game is to be able to increase real-time-music-access and decrease technical setup."

AMEN! We attempt the same thing in the books we put out, especially the new ones on Cubase SX and Sonar 2.2 coming out this summer. I believe that your concept is very much a quality control (QC) issue that most in MIDILand don't pay enough attention to. We call this, "the user experience." Our approach is rooted in what's called Six Sigma quality planning and training which starts with defining the customer's expectation.

We define a good user experience as productively implementing the software/library within a few hours, then going on to more advanced training. For our software training, we screen shoot every move. So, we get people operational pretty quickly, often within 6 hours, even on a difficult program like Logic.

For the Performance tool, Legato mode was the easiest portion. Alternation mode, Caroline struggled with a little more until we figured out that Alternation mode could really have been named Phrase Shaper. Once we were clear that we were alternating between keyswitches (hence, alternation tool), we then saw the musical application was quickly shaping a phrase using alternating up bows and down bows, etc.

The Repetition tool was the most difficult for Caroline, because we were operating on a false concept. In the VSL literature, it talks about groove patterns. Over here, we thought this was a form of Groove Control similar to what Ilio uses. But it wasn't! Once we saw that you had to play in the repetitions, that's when we understood what was going on. Up to then, Tom, Dave and Ashley were trying all kinds of things to help us get the instruction going. So no, it was not obviously clear, and I hope for the future that the GUI (graphic user interface) will be improved to more "telegraph" to the eye what's going on.

When you consider the "hidden" trumpet repeat fanfares that John Williams often sticks in, you now have with the Repetition tool, a way of replicating that. So I feel it's definitely worth learning, but you do have to set aside the time to do so.

BTW, I hear you're a drummer! I was a percussion major at Berklee ('75) where I lead my own big band playing Kenton, Rich and Don Ellis charts.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Peter Alexander
lacomposers@msn.com
310-559-3779

[Roman Beilharz]

King,

I am looking forward towards GS 3.0 as we surely all do. I know Perf.Leg. pushes the GS-design to the limit and beyond. But even if there were more dimensions, I am sure we will again run out of them pretty soon, so I am convinced, that a workaround like the multi-channel-approach will not be out of discussion by the release of 3.0. For the real-time-approach a channel/articulation-distribution works perfect and allows me to have as many dimensions as I need NOW. So I think it is important to focus on that part of the cake: what happens with MIDI BEFORE recording, too. No tweak is faster to be done than to change the MIDI-channel of a note to change its articulation. The keyswitchy part of the processing of course stays better behind the sequencer, no doubt. So I propose to think about e.g. a legato-processing, that is capable of "overlooking" more than one channel (mono-mode) for dynamics. I have ideas on how to "recognize" short note/repeated playing and auto-triggering the short-note samples etc. But that leads for off here, so let's discuss that another place.


Peter,

sorry, my deepest respect for your wife Caroline and her obviously very serious and competent work. And yes, I am a drummer (who talked - Tom, eh?). Played a lot of Big-Band stuff, too when I was young (hoooooo, that sounds funny, I am 31 now, but it is true, it was when I was around 16-22 years old...). Let's mail in private for more brabrabra, if you like. Nice to hear that you have this background, too (any background you don't have?? [;)] ).

All the best


Roman

[KingIdiot]

I dont know, I think with double the dimensions, I'd have just about everything I'd want in keyswitch or auto-alternate (I'd also have some RAM Hogging patches). Not focusing on how far they've pushed things already jsut seems to undermine what they've done and also doesn't really let in on what they could be doing for the future/pro edition release.

Anyway, about the repetition tool. I look at it as an option for "after" I've done my composing. I use the regular stacattos and sfz/dynamic samples for playing in real time, then I go back over the parts with the repetition tool to make it sound more realistic if I need to. It is possible to use the repetition tool the way you commented on, in realtime.

Just set up one Keyswitch to look like this

1:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0

and one to be:

0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1

then either one like this:

0:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:0

or multiple variations of that with some middle ones turned off

then just hit the first KS on the first note, then the third for "repetitions" and the last for "ending notes" in phrases. Its just too much of a pain to do this in fast sequences, so I dont deal with it. Its also impossible to have it automated without some sort of mind reading tool [:)]

I have some other ideas that I'm going to pass on to the VSL guys that might make it easier to do using some CC controllers and a slider. Its still something I'd do after the fact tho, to get it "right"

[Peter Alexander]

@KingIdiot said:

It is possible to use the repetition tool the way you commented on, in realtime.

The repetition tool is/was designed to be used in real time. Period. That's how Herb designed it. You might want to review Caroline's documentation on it.

PA
peter@alexuniv.com
310-559-3779

[duoartc]

I'm really confused now - does this mean the repetition tool really doesn't work well if the music is notated in? I would have imagined, that very fast repetitions would be better notated and in fact, difficult to play in realtime.

Perhaps Herb or someone at VSL could give more of an explanation of this tool - particularly for intended buyers who don't have access to the explanatory pdf file or manual.

Herb, would it be possible to post just the string part of your Dvorak piece or another example of the repetetion tool with strings?

[Bruce Richardson]

They're saying the opposite, that your sequenced part will be a direct musical representation of the actual sounding part. You will play (or program) every note in rhythm, and the tools do the job of alternations or repetitions.

[Peter Alexander]

@Bruce Richardson said:

They're saying the opposite, that your sequenced part will be a direct musical representation of the actual sounding part. You will play (or program) every note in rhythm, and the tools do the job of alternations or repetitions.

100% Correct!!!!!
PA

[duoartc]

[[;)]] Thanks guys.

It would still be good to have a pdf file available on the site with more information about the repetition tool, plus a definitive example of the repetition tool at work (by itself) in a demanding classical piece.

[KingIdiot]

@Another User said:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by KingIdiot
It is possible to use the repetition tool the way you commented on, in realtime.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The repetition tool is/was designed to be used in real time. Period. That's how Herb designed it. You might want to review Caroline's documentation on it.

PA
peter@alexuniv.com
310-559-3779

I did say *is* [[:)]]

and what I mean is real time playing in notes. It doesn't mean its always the best way to work with it tho [[:)]] In fact, I find it more useful to adjust midi sequences after I've recorded them, instead of playing in realtime trying to get all the keyswitching "right". Some speeds are just impossible to get done correctly, if you have multiple Keyswitches. The chaining is a bit too universal to work through out a whole piece.


And yes, notating in stuff and having the tool is definitely one of the best ways to work. Still tho, you may find that you'll want to make slight adjustments in either the settings on the tool, or the note on/off positions. Depending on your pickyness, and certain tempo settings, as well as instrument choices.

[Nigel Watson]

[*-)]: "I can just play all dynamic-layers of the performance-legatos by auto-distribution to separate MIDI-channels and I use keyswitches to choose short notes and other articulations needed. This way I am able to nail down one line after the other hardly without editing."

Roman, would you be kind enough to tell us how you constructed this setup in Logic? Is it some kind of transformer in the Environment , routing notes to channels according to velocity?

Thanks for this very interesting & informative discussion!

Nigel [/quote]

[Roman Beilharz]

Nigel,

yes, it is a ciruit using mainly a bunch of transformers. The basics are:

At a definable velocity-split-threshold (using a meta-fader that alters the minimum velocity-condition of a transformer that adds +1 to any incoming note's MIDI-channel) all notes are being sent to the next higher MIDI-channel (which I put the louder patch to, e.g channel 1 p and channel 2 mf). It gets a little more complicated if you like to process 3-4 channels of 3-4 dynamics. And in fact I use a mod-wheel>CC11/velocity-remapping to simulate the behaviour of a multi-layer-crossfade-patch. I am sorry it is far to complicated to describe here. Please mail me in private and I will try to send you a layer as soon as I have some days off to create a special version for interested VSL users (too much special freak-stuff within my layer right now). Give me a week or two. I have heaps of things to catch up with before, because I have been knocked out for a whole week. Damned influenza (no, this is no italian rondo-dance, you know: fever, coughing, headache...).

Good night europe

Roman