Yeah, I agree if we don't get the makers of this library to do the right thing and provide a basic set of looped strings (at least!) then I guess I'll make my own set, at some point. It just irks me that we have to spend this much money for this library and not get something that seems like a basic requirement! Keep on posting for at least the basic looped strings and maybe we can change their minds in Vienna! Thanks.
Forum Statistics
199,382 users have contributed to 43,163 threads and 258,951 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 67 new user(s).